Another Muppets movie.
Not a bad trailer, but I prefer this one:
Thumbs up for the inclusion of the Large Hadron Collider.
Jun 19 2011
Another Muppets movie?
Leave a Reply
About the Author
Sign in or join up using the following services
Contact Jason
I have opinions. So do you. You want to share them with me. I would like to do likewise. Please don't expect a platform for proselytizing that will go unchecked and unchallenged, though.
Contact me via these services:
I reserve the right to publish any contact, especially if it's hateful or ridiculous.
Not detailed enough to allow for proper stalking? Please read my Hello Freethought Blogs post. I promise* it will include my favorite style of underwear.
* Not a real promise
Contact me via these services:
I reserve the right to publish any contact, especially if it's hateful or ridiculous.
Not detailed enough to allow for proper stalking? Please read my Hello Freethought Blogs post. I promise* it will include my favorite style of underwear.
* Not a real promise
3 comments
Greg Laden
June 20, 2011 at 10:29 am CDT (UTC -5) Link to this comment
Julia and I saw yet a third trailer last week. It started out as what looked like a totally dumb-ass hybrid of a poorly done chick flick and a poorly done adolescent teeniebopper movie. Then, just as the trailer started going way down hill and I Julia and I had already expressed that this was not a movie we were going to see, the muppets showed up and made it all better.
jthibeault
June 20, 2011 at 12:47 pm CDT (UTC -5) Link to this comment
That’d be this one.
httpvhd://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ry-MPAkLRrI
Mitchell
June 21, 2011 at 1:32 pm CDT (UTC -5) Link to this comment
I’ve said it before, and I will say it again. Jim Henson may be the only true creative genius I have been exposed to in my lifetime. It’s good to see Segal, who isn’t an un-talented writer and performer by any stretch, obviously has so much passion for the mantle he’s picking up here. All I ask from a new Muppet movie is the person making it loves the Muppets, and that’s obviously the case here.