Hi! I'm a tech guy, skeptic, feminist, gamer and atheist, and love OSS and science of all stripes. I enjoy a good bit of whargarbl now and again, and will occasionally even seek it out. I am also apparently responsible for the death of common sense on the internet. My bad.
I have opinions. So do you. You want to share them with me. I would like to do likewise. Please don't expect a platform for proselytizing that will go unchecked and unchallenged, though. Contact me via the clicky thingies under my banner.
The commenting rules are simple: don't piss me off. This rule has worked for me for a decade; I have never found a need for any other rule, because any other rules leads to rules-lawyering. Just remember --
this is my property, not yours.
The Hebrew word רֶאֵם (re’em) lies behind the English translation unicorn, and nobody knows for sure what it means. The Greek translators rendered it μονόκερως, referring to a fabulous one-horned beast that supposedly resided in India (maybe the rhinoceros?), but there’s no reason to suppose they were doing anything but guessing. The English translators probably fell back on the Greek, as they often did when the Hebrew didn’t appear to make sense, and came up with unicorn.
Modern translators believe that the re’em was the auroch, as that’s the meaning of an Akkadian cognate.
We don’t know the meaning of a lot of words in ancient Hebrew, by the way. Joseph’s polychromatic coat is another example.
If it’s referring to an aurochs, it’s still interesting to me that a) AiG didn’t go that route, and b) the Bible refers to God as being as strong as one.
It’s also interesting to me that God would choose to divinely inspire people to write stories that are being taken literally as a matter of faith in a language that people only a few hundred years removed from the language would lose the ability to understand and translate properly. Seems like a good way to get people to believe things that AREN’T “Biblically true”.
In some evangelical/Pentacostal circles, the translation of the King James Version of the Bible is also considered inspired by God (“If the KJV was good enough for Jesus, it’s good enough for me!”). Either way, it’s fun to hear people who claim the Bible as inerrant and to be taken literally attempt to explain away problems like this by claiming translation errors.