Ilk Necklaces by Surly Amy!

Are you one of Greta and Jen’s ilk? Then say it to the world with a Surly Amy necklace!

The commentariat here seems to have named themselves! PZ at Pharyngula has his Horde, and now I apparently have… the Ilk. (As in, “Jen, Greta, and their ilk.” And yes, I’m more than happy to share a commentariat with Jen.)

And Amy Davis Roth — a.k.a. Surly Amy of Surly-Ramics, jeweler to the atheist and skeptical communities for many a moon — has made “ilk” necklaces! There’s an “ilk” necklace in blue and purple:

ilk necklace surly amy blue and purple

And there’s an “ilk” necklace in red and brown:

ilk necklace surly amy red and brown

BTW, she also has a “feminist” necklace, in blue and green with the word “feminist” in a lovely, delicate feminine script:

feminist necklace surly amy bllue and green

And don’t forget — there are still Ilk T-shirts for sale! Continue reading “Ilk Necklaces by Surly Amy!”

Ilk Necklaces by Surly Amy!
{advertisement}

Greta on Sex Out Loud, Atheists Talk Radio, and Pink Atheist Podcast!

I’ve been doing a bunch of radio and podcast interviews lately, and I wanted to give you the links!

sex out loud logo
I was on Tristan Taormino’s “Sex Out Loud” VoiceAmerica radio show a couple of weeks ago, and the podcast is now available for download! In the interview, we talk about pushing boundaries in erotica, questions of consent in erotic fiction, why an atheist would be intrigued by religion in her erotic writing, and more. (Most of this conversation was in the context of my erotic fiction collection, Bending: Dirty Kinky Stories About Pain, Power, Religion, Unicorns, & More.)

Minnesota-Atheists
I also did an interview with Brianne Bilyeu on the Atheists Talk radio show, hosted by Atheists of Minnesota Minnesota Atheists. We talk about atheist anger, the uses of anger in a social change movement, why religious believers see atheists as angry, how anger fits into a healthy life, and more. Plus a caller who wanted to discuss the Shroud of Turin! No, really. (Most of this conversation was in the context of my book, Why Are You Atheists So Angry? 99 Things That Piss Off the Godless.)

pink atheist podcast logo
And I did an interview with Phil Ferguson, Rachel Johnson, Lewood Thomas Horvath, and Ed Cobbs of the Pink Atheist Podcast! We talk about atheist anger, why atheists care what other people believe, whether religion is an idea or an identity (or both), tips on coming out atheist, and more.

Hope you have some driving time ahead of you! Happy listening!

Greta on Sex Out Loud, Atheists Talk Radio, and Pink Atheist Podcast!

Petitioning Richard Dawkins: Retract your trivializing statements regarding victims of sexual abuse

Content alert: Childhood sexual abuse, trivialization of childhood sexual abuse

Petitioning Richard Dawkins: Retract your trivializing statements regarding victims of sexual abuse

In case you didn’t see it: Richard Dawkins recently gave an interview to the Times of London, trivializing what he referred to as “mild” sexual abuse of children, and saying that we couldn’t judge behavior in the past by the moral standards of the present.

No, I am not making this up. Quote:

He said that he could not condemn the “mild paedophilia” he experienced at boarding school. “I am very conscious that you can’t condemn people of an earlier era by the standards of ours,” he says in an interview published today in The Times Magazine.

“Just as we don’t look back at the 18th and 19th centuries and condemn people for racism in the same way as we would condemn a modern person for racism, I look back a few decades to my childhood and see things like caning, like mild paedophilia, and can’t find it in me to condemn it by the same standards as I or anyone would today.”

Professor Dawkins, an evolutionary biologist, describes in a new autobiography how a master at his Salisbury prep school “pulled me on to his knee and put his hand inside my shorts”. He writes that the episode was “extremely disagreeable” and that other boys were molested by the same teacher, but concludes: “I don’t think he did any of us any lasting damage.”

It sickens me to think of how statements like this contribute to the shaming and silencing of sexual abuse victims — especially the victims of sexual abuse in childhood. Dawkins is entirely entitled to express his own experience with sexual abuse however he experienced it — but he is absolutely not entitled to tell other victims that their abuse “didn’t do any lasting damage.”

And it appalls me to think that the world will see this as representative of the atheist community — and will use it as yet another example of how atheists have no morality. (The story is already up at the Washington Post as well as the Times of London.)

There’s a petition up — asking Dawkins to retract his statements, but also demonstrating to the world that these ideas absolutely do not reflect the values of the atheist community, and that we utterly repudiate them. Please sign — and please spread the word.

FYI, there are some excellent articles up about this, with very sharp and perceptive analysis, and I highly recommend that you read them:

Alex Gabriel at Godlessness In Theory:

Imagine a senior Catholic official – a British archbishop, for example, or a cardinal in Rome – spoke to the Times about his childhood church. Imagine he described a village priest who ‘pulled me on to his knee and put his hand inside my shorts’, claiming this priest molested other boys regularly. Imagine that, while calling this ‘extremely disagreeable’, the Catholic official then said ‘I don’t think he did any of us any lasting damage.’ Imagine he stressed this happened in the 1940s, arguing ‘you can’t condemn people of an earlier era by the standards of ours’, cautioned ‘we must beware of lumping all paedophiles into the same bracket’, and suggested according to the newspaper ‘that recent child sex abuse scandals have been overblown’.

How would atheists online react? Not well, I’m sure.

PZ Myers at Pharyngula:

Just when did it stop being OK for acquaintances to put their hands inside Richard Dawkins shorts? I presume it would be an utterly intolerable act now, of course — at what age do the contents of childrens’ pants stop being public property?

Petitioning Richard Dawkins: Retract your trivializing statements regarding victims of sexual abuse

Secular Meditation: The Serenity to Accept What Could Be Changed, But Doesn't Actually Need to Be

serenity rock
“The serenity to accept the things I can’t change, the courage to change the things I can, and the wisdom to know the difference.”

It’s the famous “serenity prayer” from Alcoholics Anonymous. Minus the prayer part, of course. And it’s a theme I keep coming back to in my secular meditation/ mindfulness practice.

A big part of this practice — both in my formal meditation sessions, and in my work to become more mindful in my everyday life — has to do with acceptance. It revolves around noticing experiences, and having them, without judging them, without trying to fix them or change them, just letting them be until they pass. If I’m meditating or working on being mindful, and I start feeling anxious, tired, jangled, bored, restless, guilty, fearful, impatient, moody for no reason, desperately overwhelmed with grief, itchy… I notice it, I let myself experience it, I return my focus to whatever I’m focusing on. (Ditto with pleasant experiences, of course… but that’s easier, I don’t have an overwhelming urge to constantly fix pleasant experiences. Although… well, I’ll get to that in a moment.)

This doesn’t mean being a doormat, or a passive sponge. In fact, since starting this practice, I’ve found that when I am working to change something, I’ve become more focused, better at prioritizing, less easily distracted, better at noticing when I have become distracted, better at drawing my attention away from whatever’s distracting me and bringing it back to my work. (More on that in a later piece I’m working on in my head, about mindfulness and anger.) Acceptance of the things I can’t change is actually fairly helpful in finding the courage to change the things I can.

The “wisdom to know the difference” part, of course, is where things get tricky. Among other things: How do you know what can’t be changed if you don’t try to change it? The world has been made immeasurably better, in countless ways, by people who looked at things that everyone else thought were immutable — lynching, legalized spousal rape, smallpox — and said, “Nope. Not accepting this. Not acceptable.” So how do you know? How do you know when you’re being a visionary, when you’re dreaming things that never were and asking “Why not?” — and when you’re just beating your head against a wall? How do you know when to stick with your dream against all odds, and when to cut your losses? It’s the “wisdom to know the difference” part that takes this relatively simple, almost ham-handedly obvious little aphorism, and turns it into a large, deep question that you ask yourself dozens of times a day, and never stop asking for as long as you’re alive.

So, yeah. Serenity to accept what I can’t change; courage to change what I can; wisdom to know the difference. Awesome. But there’s a fourth thing I’ve been getting and learning from this practice, something they don’t mention in the serenity prayer saying, and it’s something I’m finding to be hugely important and even transformative:

The serenity to accept things that I could change, but that don’t actually need to be changed.

The serenity to accept minor annoyances. The serenity to notice that I’m bored, and to simply sit with my boredom, instead of immediately looking for something to do; to notice that I’m anxious, and to simply sit with my anxiety, instead of immediately looking for something to soothe it; to notice that I’m sad, and to simply sit with my sadness, instead of immediately looking for something to relieve it or distract me from it. The serenity to simply experience my life, instead of constantly tinkering with it to try to make it just a little bit better. The serenity — and the wisdom too, I guess — to realize that even if this tinkering does slightly improve my momentary condition or mood, being in a constant state of tinkering has a significant detrimental affect on my quality of life: it adds to my restlessness, my anxiety, my feeling of being jangled and overwhelmed.

people-getting-on-bus
Here’s the thing. Or here’s a thing, anyway. If the focus of my life is less on pleasure or achievement, and more on simply being present in it… than just about any experience is an opportunity for that. I can be present, aware, in the moment, no matter where I am or what I’m doing or how I’m feeling. I’m not going to say that any experience is as good as any other — I don’t think that. Some experiences are more deeply satisfying than others, and they’re worth seeking out and creating, for myself and for others. And, of course, some experiences are worth avoiding, and working to eliminate, for myself and for others. You know — lynching, legalized spousal rape, smallpox, that sort of thing. But just about any experience is an opportunity for… well, for experience. Waiting in line; having a headache; missing my father; feeling tired and discouraged; sitting on a bus staring out the window at an ugly industrial landscape… I can be present with all of this. All of it is an opportunity to fully experience the un-fucking-believably lucky accident of having been born, and getting to be alive and conscious.

And what I’m finding is that, when I’m not constantly tinkering with every little piece of anxiety or tiredness or jangled nerves or boredom or restlessness or guilt or fear or impatience or moodiness or grief or itchiness, I have more energy for the “courage to change the things I can” stuff. The constant tinkering isn’t just emotionally exhausting — it’s literally exhausting. It takes time and energy.

Not sure where I’m going with this, so I think I’m just going to let it peter out. Accepting things that I could change, but that don’t actually need to be changed. A cool thing. Thumbs up.

Secular Meditation: The Serenity to Accept What Could Be Changed, But Doesn't Actually Need to Be

A Martyr of Modern Skepticism: The Assassination of Prominent Atheist Narendra Dabholkar

A great skeptical leader has been assassinated.

This didn’t happen in a tyrannical theocracy. This happened in a modern, supposedly secular nation, with no state religion, and with first-class programs of science and medicine. And still, for the crime of criticizing religious beliefs, questioning them, and subjecting them to scientific scrutiny, a great skeptical leader was gunned down on the street in broad daylight.

narendra_dabholkar
For over two decades, Dr. Narendra Dabholkar dedicated his life to overcoming superstition in India. Originally a medical doctor, Dabholkar spent years exposing religious charlatans, quacks, frauds, purveyors of “miracle cures,” and other con artists preying on gullibility, desperation, and trust. An activist against caste discrimination in India, and an advocate for women’s rights and environmentalism, Dr. Dabholkar’s commitment to social justice was expansive and enduring. But it was his work against superstition that earned him his fame.

India is a huge, hugely diverse country, and much of it — particularly the South — is thoroughly modern, urban, and largely secular. But much of the country — particularly the North — is saturated with self-proclaimed sorcerers, faith healers, fortune tellers, psychics, gurus, godmen, and other spiritual profiteers. In parts of the country, people are beaten, mutilated, or murdered for being suspected of witchcraft, and there are even rare cases of human sacrifice — including the sacrifice of children — in rituals meant to appease the gods.

Throughout this country, Dr. Dabholkar traveled to towns and villages, investigating claims of miracles and magic, revealing the physical reality behind the tricks — and organizing travelling troops of activists to do the same. He didn’t try to persuade people out of the very idea of religious belief, but he was an open atheist, proud and unapologetic. He was the Founder of the Committee for Eradication of Superstition in Maharashtra (Maharashtra Andhashraddha Nirmoolan Samiti). He fought for years for the passage of a controversial anti-black-magic bill in India.

And it was his work against superstition that almost certainly cost him his life.

*****

Thus begins my latest piece for AlterNet, A Martyr of Modern Skepticism: The Assassination of Prominent Atheist Narendra Dabholkar. To find out more about Dr. Dabholkar’s life, work, and murder — and the context it all took place in — read the rest of the piece. And please share it, retweet it, etc. – this story needs to be heard, outside the atheist/skeptical community as well as within it.

A Martyr of Modern Skepticism: The Assassination of Prominent Atheist Narendra Dabholkar

Poster for "A Better Life," a.k.a. The Atheist Book

Photographer Chris Johnson has been traveling around the world: photographing atheists, asking us to tell our stories, and putting it all in a photography book, titled “A Better Life: 100 Atheists Speak Out on Joy & Meaning in a World Without God.” Participants include Jamila Bey, Jessica Ahlquist, Rebecca Goldstein, Steven Pinker, Julia Sweeney, Anthony Pinn, Teresa Macbain, Dan Barker, Annie Laurie Gaylor, Rebecca Watson, Cara Santa Maria, A.C. Grayling, PZ Myers, Indre Viskontas, Daniel Dennett, Matt Dillahunty, and lots more.

The Kickstarted project is in its final stages of production, and he sent me a copy of this lovely promotional poster for it.

A Better Life poster

My, those are some fine-looking atheists, aren’t they?

If you want to get a notification when the book comes out, go to Chris’s website and get on his notification thingie. It should be gorgeous — I can’t wait to get my copy!

Poster for "A Better Life," a.k.a. The Atheist Book

"Hug an Atheist," and the 5th Atheist Film Festival, Sept. 14

Hug an Atheist
I’ve been watching a preview of the “Hug an Atheist” documentary with great pleasure. A not unbiased pleasure, obviously — it’s hard to be unbiased about a movie that you’re actually in — but I think I would enjoy this movie tremendously even if I weren’t in it. It’s a pretty straight-up talking-heads documentary — interviews with different atheists about our lives and views and experiences, woven together thematically by the questions being asked — but the content is far from ordinary. I like how the filmmaker, Sylvia Broeckx, didn’t shy away from difficult topics: the film spends about as much time on how atheists handle illness and suffering and death as it does on how we experience meaning and morality, or parenting and Christmas. And I like how people’s answers aren’t your standard “positive happy atheism” PR: the interviewees acknowledge difficulties, expose vulnerability and pain, reveal real differences in philosophies.

5th atheist film festival banner

“Hug an Atheist” will have its premiere at the 5th Atheist Film Festival, coming up in San Francisco Sept. 14. Other film topics include: Charles Darwin, a fake guru (I know, they all are, in this case it’s a deliberate fake), creationism in the public schools, religious proselytizing in the public schools, the Magdalene laundries in Ireland, and Heaven. For several of the films, the directors or other folks involved in the production will be on hand for Q&A. Plus there’s a directors’ reception the night before, which I’ve been to before and is always a blast.

The Atheist Film Festival will be at the Roxie Theater — 3117 16th St., a block from the 16th and Mission BART station — on Saturday, September 14. You can get all-day passes, or tickets for individual films. And if you get both a festival pass and a ticket to the directors’ reception, you get a discount on both. Hope to see you there!

"Hug an Atheist," and the 5th Atheist Film Festival, Sept. 14

Please help the next Jessica Ahlquist today

This is a guest post from David Fitzgerald, Regional Campus Organizer at the Secular Student Alliance.

When students like Jessica Ahlquist and Zack Kopplin took a stand against First Amendment violations at their schools, it wasn’t easy – they faced tremendous, heart-breaking opposition. We know many more students are out there right now, deciding whether or not to stand up for their rights. The Secular Student Alliance wants to make sure they know that they are not alone and have the full support of the secular community behind them.

That is why we at the SSA are crowd-funding for a new position: a Rapid Response Organizer (RRO). Part journalist, part crisis manager, part mediator, and part organizer, the RRO will fight to ensure that the SSA can defend, support, and amplify the work of students who need our help. The RRO will also make sure that the incredible work students do every day will be promoted fully, as blueprints and inspiration to other students and the movement as a whole!

We want you to be part of creating this new position. The SSA is over halfway to their goal, but still has $50,000 to raise by September 25th. Everybody can help make this happen.

If you’re a struggling student or your heart is bigger than your wallet: even a gift of $5 or $10 will go a long way towards making this position a reality. And, with a gift of $10 or more, you get one of our awesome incentives like a sticker, button, and Active Supportership in the SSA!

We understand that not all of you have the ability to do this: that is okay. We still want your help making this important position a reality. Please reach out to those people in your life that support your secular activism, be they parents, siblings, friends, or local off-campus groups. Let them know how much the SSA means to you, and how important this position is to the secular movement. Share the link with your social media networks if you are comfortable.

If you are in fiscal position to help, fantastic! Supporting the SSA is one of the most effective steps you can take to strengthen the next generation of freethinkers and activists. These bold students are already making the world a better place, right now! Please help them make these changes happen in your community and around the country by giving generously today.

We need your help to ensure that no secular student is fighting on their own. Please support the Rapid Response Organizer campaign. Thank you for your support of the SSA and all of the work you do!

http://rapid.secularstudents.org/

Please help the next Jessica Ahlquist today

Where I Got the Science Nerd Chic Accessories

When I put up my recent post about my Science Nerd Chic outfit for the Academy of Sciences’ “Nightlife at the Museum” Fashion Night, several people expressed admiration for the accessories — especially the shoes. So I thought I’d let you know where you can get them.

Greta at Nightlife at the Museum Fashion Night 3

The shoes are the Icon, made by Hades. Mine are black, but they also come in brown or mustard. I got mine at Steamtropolis.

Greta at Nightlife at the Museum Fashion Night 4

The tights are the Universe style from Foot Traffic. They have them in several styles and sizes, in both gray and blue.

Greta at Nightlife at the Museum Fashion Night 5

The octopus necklace is actually pretty ubiquitous: I’ve seen pretty much the exact same thing in lots of places. I bought it at a second-hand/ vintage store, but a quick Google search for “octopus necklace” turned it up at Modcloth, in both silver and gold colors. Also, if you do a search for “octopus necklace” on Etsy, you’ll find the exact same piece with slight modifications — with an owl face, with a diving helmet, adorned with pearl beads, painted pink, and more — as well as straight-up.

Happy shopping!

(Oh, and the the computer-innard bracelet was made custom for me by my friend Josie, as a gift.)

Where I Got the Science Nerd Chic Accessories