This is the title of a blog post asking you to help Chris Clarke

If you don’t know Chris Clarke of the Coyote Crossing blog, you should.

You may know him, even if you don’t think you know him. His hi-fucking-larious post, This is the title of a typical incendiary blog post, was all over the Internets for a while. (You have to read the comment thread.) And his recent post on misogyny almost made me cry, in the best possible way.

His Jeep just got stolen — for the second time in two weeks — and was totaled. He cannot afford this.

Hank Fox at Blue Collar Atheist is doing a fundraiser to help him out. Chip in if you can.

This is the title of a blog post asking you to help Chris Clarke
{advertisement}

Why Are Believers Willfully Ignorant About Atheists?

This piece was originally published on AlterNet.

When believers talk about atheists, they often don’t bother to talk to any first. What are they afraid of?

Did you hear the one about the Anglican minister who said atheists have no reason for grief?

I wish I was joking. I’m not. In a widely- disseminated and discussed opinion piece, Anglican minister Rev. Gavin Dunbar made an interesting and even compelling argument that grief is necessary for love and humanity… and then went on to argue that, unless you believe in God, you have no reason to care whether the people you love live or die, or even to love them in the first place.

Again: I wish I was joking. I quote:

The new atheists proclaim their gospel with the fervour of believers: God is dead, man is free, free from the destructive illusions of religion and morality, of reason and virtue. But then a someone dies, suddenly and cruelly, like the young man known to many in ..[this] parish [in [Eastern Georgia] who was killed in a freakish accident last weekend. And his death casts a pall of grief over his family, his friends, their families, his school, and many others. Yet if he was no more than an arrangement of molecules, a selfish gene struggling to replicate itself, there can be no reason for grief, or for the love that grieves, since these are (we are told) essentially selfish survival mechanisms left over from some earlier stage in hominid evolution. Friendship is just another illusion. But of course we do grieve, even the atheists. And in so grieving, they grieve better than they know (or think they know).

The grieving atheist cannot provide any reason why he grieves, or why he (rightly) respects the grief of others.

My first reaction… well, to be honest, my first reaction was pretty close to blind rage. As an atheist, I’ve been targeted before with bigotry, with hostility, even with hatred and threats of violence. But rarely have I encountered a critic of atheism who was so ready to deny even my basic humanity. Rarely have I encountered a critic of atheism who was so ready to tell me — and to tell the world — that because I am an atheist, I see not only morality and virtue, but love and friendship and grief, as an illusion. I actually agree with Dunbar that grief is one of the things that makes us human… and it filled me with rage to be told that, because I don’t believe in a magical soul animating my body, because I don’t think I’m going to see my dead loved ones in an invisible forever happy place, I am somehow incapable of experiencing this essential humanity. My first reaction on reading this piece was pretty much to scream “Fuck you” at my computer screen, and be done with it. Continue reading “Why Are Believers Willfully Ignorant About Atheists?”

Why Are Believers Willfully Ignorant About Atheists?

#FTBullies: When Hashtags Go Bad

If you’re on Twitter, you have to check this out.

If you’re not on Twitter, you might want to join now, just to check this out.

A couple/ few days ago, someone (I lost track of who) who doesn’t like Freethought Blogs started the Twitter hashtag, #FTBullies, for Twitter discussions of how… um, I guess how Freethought Blogs are bullies.

The hashtag has now been adopted by a number of people who like Freethought Blogs — including some of the Freethought Blogs bloggers — with silly, absurdist, over-the-top accusations of all the horror and evil perpetrated by us.

A few of my faves:

Crommunist ‏@Crommunist: RT @QueQuoi: “If you asked #FTBullies if they had any Grey Poupon, they would say no.” || But we TOTALLY have a WHOLE THING OF IT!

sardjt ‏@sardjt: #FTBullies stole my 15 minutes of fame and gave them to a squid

RahXephon ‏@rahxephon231: @Mona_Albano #FTBullies made me go vegetarian just to support Big Tofu.

Improbable Joe ‏@ImprobableJoe: Grandma got run over by #FTBullies

Bastion Of Sass ‏@bastionofsass: You know how one sock of a pair goes missing in the washer? #FTBullies steal them and think that’s really funny.

Erülóra Maikalambe ‏@Erulora: #FTBullies stole the cookie from the cookie jar.

Bastion Of Sass ‏@bastionofsass: #FTBullies Told unicorns there was no big rush to get on the ark.

Momo Elektra ‏@MomoElektra: #FTBullies rigged the Kobayashi Maru, so nobody would win

Ophelia Benson ‏@OpheliaBenson: #FTBullies ordered pizza with PINEAPPLE.

Rebecca Watson ‏@rebeccawatson: Lots of talk on Twitter about how bad the #FTBullies are. I don’t want to pile on, but: they wrote Prometheus.

Sasha Pixlee ‏@sashapixlee: .@szvan suggested a book to me once. It was super good but the sequel isn’t even finished yet! #FTBullies.

Stacy Kennedy‏@MsMondegreen: Your MasterCard account has been deactivated. Send your card number and expiration date to #FTBullies for reinstatement.

Jessa ‏@jessa_bell: #FTBullies killed Kenny. #youbastards

TerriWillis-Gardocki ‏@thetwillis: #FTBullies told everyone what I’d do for a Klondike Bar.

Chris Clarke ‏@canislatrans: Not the least obeisance made he; not a minute stopped or stayed he; But with mien of #FTBullies, perched above my chamber door.

Dan Fincke ‏@CamelsHammers: Luke, #FTBullies are your father.

Veritas ‏@VeritasKnight: @CamelsHammers Nooooo…that can’t be, #FTBullies…that’s impossible!

I got in several licks before I realized that I had actual work to do. But this is the one that seems to have established my claim to fame:

Greta Christina ‏@GretaChristina: #FTBullies are never gonna give you up, never gonna let you down, never gonna run around & desert you. Yeah I went there.

Some other good compilations are at Lousy Canuck, Butterflies and Wheels, and Pteryxx in a comment on B&W.

The Internet. Providing smart, creative, hilarious people with hours of wasted time since 1995.

#FTBullies: When Hashtags Go Bad

What Gets Left Out of Conversations: Stephanie Zvan's "Elisions"

I’ve decided that one weekday a week, I need to devote my time on working on my next books, and not write a whole new blog post. So for that day, I’m going to point to other blog posts that other people have written, comment on them briefly, and open them up for discussion.

A few days ago, Stephanie Zvan wrote an excellent piece called Elisions. I’ve been citing it a lot in comment threads, so I want to take a moment to post about it.

The gist of the piece: In discussions of sexist or sexually harassing incidents, when people say that feminists are over-reacting, they often leave out the very details that make the incident in question problematic. Quote:

It’s always fascinating to watch a tale be retold and see what gets left out. It says almost as much about the storyteller as what is left in.

In the case of the infamous elevator, sometimes all that has been left in is the coffee. Even the elevator itself is sometimes elided. The hours of opportunity for a single word of conversation generally disappear. Certainly all the hours of discussion of being tired of being hit on are gone. So is the expressed desire for sleep. That one never makes it into the story.

It’s not just conversations about sexism or harassment where this happens, of course. It happens in conversations about race, about class, about atheism. Homophobia. Transphobia. Etc. Pretty much any time people from a marginalized group speak out about their/ our marginalization, the story will get re-told in a way that omits the most pertinent details, the very details that form the foundation of the protest — thus making the protest look trivial and ridiculous.

Thoughts? Have other people noticed this? If so, what other examples have you seen? Will you now be linking to this piece every single freaking time someone says, “Sheesh, the poor guy just asked the woman for coffee”? Your time starts… now!

What Gets Left Out of Conversations: Stephanie Zvan's "Elisions"

Street Art: "Like"

Continuing the street art series.

This is a spout in a wall of blue tile… which someone has turned into art, by affixing a thumbs-up symbol with the word “Like” above it.

I like this on so many levels. (Not least of which is how self-referential my “liking” of it automatically becomes.) There’s the obvious surrealist Magritte/ Duchamp concept, of turning ordinary things into art just by pointing to them, and of art being a way of looking as much as (if not more than) a way of creating. Plus I’m always fond of things that make you wake up to your surroundings, and make you pay attention to the beautiful in the ordinary. And at the same time, there seems to be a commentary on social media and Internet culture, and our tendency in those cultures to feel like we have to give a simplistic thumbs-up or thumbs-down to absolutely everything.

Or maybe I’m reading too much into it. Maybe it’s just beautiful and funny.

Seen either on Mission or Valencia Street, I forget which. If anyone knows who the artist is, please let me know, so I can credit them properly.

Street Art: "Like"

Unmixing Messages: Nudity, Sex, and Hooking Up at Atheist Conferences

If some atheist women pose nude for a calendar, does this have implications for the question of sexual conduct at atheist conferences?

My attention was recently called to a blog post by John Loftus at Debunking Christianity, in which he addresses (among other things) this question. I quote:

Some high profile secular women have undressed for a Nude Photo Revolutionary Calendar, which is promoted by some of the women at Freethought Blogs and includes Greta Christina and Maryam Namazie in solidarity with blogger Aliaa Magda Elmahdy, who posted a nude photo of herself as a scream “against a society of violence, racism, sexism, sexual harassment and hypocrisy.” Others participated in Boobquake. Skepchick regularly posts something called “Skepchick Quickies” (*ahem*). The message is clear to me, that women can use their bodies as they see fit. I understand that completely. Men do not own the bodies of women. (No, I’m not interested at all thank you very much).

But this sends a mixed message to some ignorant young men now doesn’t it? It’s not surprising to me that some of them may think some secular women are “available.” It can create an environment at Freethought conventions where some men may look to hook up. Thunderf00t is asking what’s wrong with that in the bars afterward? Hooking up is what some people want to do (men and women). Knowing which ones want to do so is another question. How are some of these men supposed to know?

I was unaware that my posing for the Nude Photo Revolutionary Calendar was sending a “mixed message,” or indeed any kind of message, about people having sex at conferences. But if there’s anyone reading this for whom these messages are getting mixed, let me un-mix them posthaste. Continue reading “Unmixing Messages: Nudity, Sex, and Hooking Up at Atheist Conferences”

Unmixing Messages: Nudity, Sex, and Hooking Up at Atheist Conferences

Religion and the Just World Fallacy

Harebrained speculation time!

I’ve been reading a little bit about a cognitive bias I hadn’t heard of before — the Just World Hypothesis, or the Just World Fallacy. It came up several times in the conversations about sexual harassment and victim-blaming — but it occurs to me that it may shed some light on religion, and why people believe in it.

In a very quick, over-simplified nutshell: This hypothesis asserts that human beings have a cognitive bias. We are prone to thinking that the world is fair, and that people get what they deserve — both good and bad. So if bad things happen to someone, we’re unconsciously inclined to think that it’s the consequences of their bad character or bad past behavior. Similarly, when good things happen to someone, we’re unconsciously biased towards thinking that they earned it. Studies show that our opinion of other people goes up when good things happen to them, and goes down when bad things happen to them — even when those events are entirely random. The obvious form that this bias takes is blaming the victims for crimes or disaster or illness — but it takes other forms as well, such as assuming that rich or privileged people have earned their wealth and privilege.

There are apparently a number of theories as to why we would have this cognitive bias. This bias may support our tendency to see the world in terms of agency, things being caused intentionally, rather than random chance. It may make it easier for us to see ourselves as having agency, and thus make us more likely to take action in our own lives. It may help us resolve our own guilt / cognitive dissonance if we think we share some responsibility for the harm being done — such as buying products produced by exploited and abused laborers — or the guilt / cognitive dissonance we may experience if we feel that we ought to intervene in the harm, but are choosing not to. (There are probably other theories about the reasons behind this bias as well: I’m not an expert in psychology, and I just found out about this thing the other day.)

So what does all this have to do with religion?

I bet you see where I’m going with this. Continue reading “Religion and the Just World Fallacy”

Religion and the Just World Fallacy

"Daylight Atheism" – Book Now On Kindle!

Daylight Atheism, the new book by Daylight Atheism blogger Adam Lee, is now available on Kindle!

Here’s what I had to say about it:

Adam Lee has long been one of my favorite atheist writers. (In fact, his blog is a big part of why I got into the game.) And this book is a perfect example of why. His writing is both clear and passionate – a tricky balance. He dismantles theism with precision and righteous anger, and offers an optimistic vision of the alternative. Atheists will find both ammunition and inspiration here – and theists who care whether the things they believe are true are encouraged to test their faith in this white-hot furnace.

But don’t just take my word for it. Here’s what some other people had to say about it:

Adam Lee has been a voice of reason for atheists (and curious Christians) online for many years and this book, as with all of his writing, makes a strong case for the atheist worldview. I suspect you’ll find it very convincing since Adam does such a thorough job of laying out the evidence against faith and sharing what many other atheists before you have said about it. Whether you’re brand new to atheism or a seasoned philosopher, there’s something in here to help you leave the darkness of faith and come into the daylight.
-Hemant Mehta, blogger at Friendly Atheist, author of I Sold My Soul On eBay

For those who have left biblical religion or are wavering, Adam Lee’s book is an intellectual and spiritual journey. Lee looks at Bible-belief with both compassion and unflinching honesty, but he doesn’t stop there. Through a window into his own inner life and the words of leading freethinkers, he opens up the rich depth that can be found in life – and death – beyond religion.
-Valerie Tarico, blogger at Away Point, author of Trusting Doubt

Adam Lee’s writing has made him one of the most widely-read atheist bloggers – and rightfully so. This effort should secure him a place amongst atheism’s most informative and relatable authors.
-J.T. Eberhard, blogger at What Would JT Do?, campus organizing coordinator for the Secular Student Alliance

Atheists—and their argument—inspire so much fear because they’re so unknown. Unlearn your fear by reading Adam’s book and realizing that atheists really are just like everyone else. In fact, you probably know one and just don’t know it yet.
-Amanda Marcotte, blogger at Pandagon, author of It’s a Jungle Out There and Get Opinionated

To a believer, atheism can seem dark, cold, and frightening. Adam Lee opens the shutters and lets the sunlight in. Daylight Atheism speaks clearly and passionately of the joy of living a reality-based existence guided by respect for each human person. Highly recommended.
-Mary Johnson, former member of the Missionaries of Charity, author of An Unquenchable Thirst: A Memoir

The books is now available on Kindle. Other e-book platforms, via Smashwords, will be ready very soon, and hardcopy format is coming later this summer. Check it out!

"Daylight Atheism" – Book Now On Kindle!