So as some of you may know, Ophelia Benson at Butterflies and Wheels posted this to her blog a couple of days ago:
I got email threats about TAM today, so I’m not going.
One less thing to worry about.
Today she posted a follow-up, saying that the threat in question seems not to have been intended as a threat — it seems to have been a sincerely well-meant warning, worded in a clumsy, hyperbolic manner that made it indistinguishable from a threat. (Content of both emails is posted in the follow-up.) And, of course, she’s getting comments from people trivializing the entire matter, and saying that Ophelia should never have treated the email as a threat. Mostly she’s getting empathy and support: I want to spell that out right up front, for people who are feeling battle-worn about this whole conflagration. But she is also getting some of the “Oh, that wasn’t a threat” response.
And I’ve seen this “Oh, that wasn’t a threat” trope before: not just from trolls, but from intelligent, thoughtful people who I generally consider allies.
So now seems like the time to say something about threats, something I’ve been thinking about for a while.
Here is the thing about threats, veiled threats, joking threats, references to threats, and warnings about threats that are indistinguishable from all of the above:
They’re all Schroedinger’s Threat. Continue reading “Schroedinger's Threat”