There are stages, I’ve noticed, to every Richard Dawkins Twitter storm.
Dawkins publishes a response at RD.net, often referring to ‘a storm in a teacup’ or insisting – despite being a professional communicator – that the rest of the world was at fault for not grasping his true meaning.
People at wit’s end tend to give up at this point, but eventually he mouths off on something else and the cycle repeats.
I’ve come up with an illustrated guide.
(On the other hand, there’s this.)