"2008 Was the Year"

AFL-CIO’s Richard Trumka speech on combating racism, the necessity of unions to unite, and the vision of the future if we elect Obama is some pretty powerful stuff:

I don’t think we should be out there pointing fingers in peoples’ faces and calling them racist; instead we need to educate them that if they care about holding on to their jobs, their health care, their pensions, and their homes — if they care about creating good jobs with clean energy, child care, pay equity for women workers — there’s only going to be one candidate on the ballot this fall who’s on their side… only one candidate who’s going to stand up for their families… only one candidate who’s earned their votes… and his name is Barack Obama!

And come November we are going to elect him president.

And after he’s elected we are going to hit the ground running so that, years from now, we’re going to be able to tell our grandchildren that 2008 was the year this country finally turned its back on men like George Bush and Dick Cheney and John McCain

We’re going to be able to say that 2008 was the year we started ending the war in Iraq so we could use that money to create new jobs building wind generators, solar collectors, clean coal technology and retrofitting millions of buildings all across this country

We’re going to be able to look back and say that 2008 was the year the tide began to turn against the Rush Limbaughs, the Bill O’Reillys, the Ann Coulters and the right wing hate machine.

I can drink to that.

(Tip o’ the shot glass to Platypus at Daily Kos)

"2008 Was the Year"
{advertisement}

Happy Hour Discurso

Today’s opining on the public discourse.

Last night’s vice presidential debate was a mitigated disaster. Sarah Palin managed to string some coherent-sounding sentences together, which was a vast improvement over her interview performances (what a difference no follow-up makes!). She sounded like a semi-bright high school junior faking her way through a presentation on a subject she hasn’t studied, and pulled together enough talking points to earn a low C.

On the truth front, however, she earns a ginormous F:

We’ve come to expect a breathtaking degree of dishonesty from Palin over the last five weeks — anyone who repeats, dozens of times, that she opposed the Bridge to Nowhere after she publicly supported it has already forfeited quite a bit of credibility — but looking over my notes from last night, I came up with this list of my favorite Palin lies.

* Obama voted against troop funding? That’s wildly misleading.

* Obama voted to raise taxes 94 times? That’s absurd.

* Obama wants “the feds” to “take over” Americans’ “mandated” healthcare? That’s not even close to reality.

* Obama voted to raise taxes on families making only $42,000 a year? A transparent lie.

* Palin boasted that she was among the Alaskan policymakers who “called for divestment” from state money invested in Sudan. Actually, her administration opposed divestment, at least at first, saying the Alaska Permanent Fund shouldn’t take social or political agendas into consideration.

I wasn’t able to watch the debate live, but I kept up on it via liveblogging at various sites, and my first (and continuing thought) was, “Wow. That’s a lie. That’s a lie. That’s a great big fucking lie. Is she going to say anything that isn’t a bald-faced lie? Ha! Yes – when she’s being completely fucking incoherent:”

But there are real changes going on in our climate. And I don’t want to argue about the causes. What I want to argue about is, how are we going to get there to positively affect the impacts?

We have got to clean up this planet. We have got to encourage other nations also to come along with us with the impacts of climate change, what we can do about that.

As governor, I was the first governor to form a climate change sub-cabinet to start dealing with the impacts. We’ve got to reduce emissions. John McCain is right there with an “all of the above” approach to deal with climate change impacts.

We’ve got to become energy independent for that reason. Also as we rely more and more on other countries that don’t care as much about the climate as we do, we’re allowing them to produce and to emit and even pollute more than America would ever stand for.

So even in dealing with climate change, it’s all the more reason that we have an “all of the above” approach, tapping into alternative sources of energy and conserving fuel, conserving our petroleum products and our hydrocarbons so that we can clean up this planet and deal with climate change.

She really doesn’t have any idea what she’s talking about, does she? That’s okay – I have no fucking clue what she’s talking about, either.

And then we have incoherency and lies:

In tonight’s debate, Sarah Palin mischaracterized statements by the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan, Gen. David McKiernan, in which he said that an Iraq-like “surge” would not be appropriate for Afghanistan.

Palin asserted that one thing distinguishing John McCain’s proposed policy in Afghanistan from President Bush’s was that McCain thinks that “the surge principles that have worked in Iraq need to be implemented in Afghanistan, also.”

In response Biden pounced, noting that McKiernan had come out against such an approach just today. Palin then hedged, saying that “McClellan” (meaning McKiernan) had not “definitively” ruled out using “surge principles” in Afghanistan:

Well, first, McClellan did not say definitively the surge principles would not work in Afghanistan. Certainly, accounting for different conditions in that different country and conditions are certainly different. We have NATO allies helping us for one and even the geographic differences are huge but the counterinsurgency principles could work in Afghanistan. McClellan didn’t say anything opposite of that. The counterinsurgency strategy going into Afghanistan, clearing, holding, rebuilding, the civil society and the infrastructure can work in Afghanistan. And those leaders who are over there, who have also been advising George Bush on this have not said anything different but that.

But according to a report in Thursday’s Washington Post, McKiernan was emphatic in remarks made Wednesday, that a “surge” would not succeed in Afghanistan. Here’s what McKiernan actually said, according to the Post:

“Afghanistan is not Iraq,” said Gen. David D. McKiernan, who led ground forces during the 2003 Iraq invasion and took over four months ago as head of the NATO-led coalition in Afghanistan.

Speaking in Washington yesterday, McKiernan described Afghanistan as “a far more complex environment than I ever found in Iraq.” The country’s mountainous terrain, rural population, poverty, illiteracy, 400 major tribal networks and history of civil war all make for unique challenges, he said.

“The word I don’t use for Afghanistan is ‘surge,’ ” McKiernan stressed, saying that what is required is a “sustained commitment” to a counterinsurgency effort that could last many years and would ultimately require a political, not military, solution.

Note to Sarah: General McClellan’s dead, and General McKiernan would like you to stop putting your own lies in his mouth, thanks so much.

This fucking freak who can’t tell the difference between a live general and a dead one, and who can’t comprehend the simple sentence “Afghanistan is not Iraq,” plans as Vice President to lord it over the legislative and judicial branches:

During the vice presidential debate last night, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin said that she agreed with Vice President Cheney’s belief that there is “a lot of flexibility” in the Off
ice of the Vice President and that she was “thankful the Constitution would allow
a bit more authority given to the vice president.”

[snip]

In an interview with Fox News’ Carl Cameron this morning, Palin attempted to explain what she meant about “the flexibility of the vice presidency.” “The vice president, of course, is not a member — or a part of the legislative branch, except to oversee the Senate,” said Palin. “That alone provides a tremendous amount of flexibility and authority if that vice president so chose to use it.”

She then claimed that she intended on “bleeding” her “authority over to the Legislative or Judicial branch” in order to push McCain’s agenda:

CAMERON: Would you change any of that, (INAUDIBLE) than the Bush/Cheney administration in terms of the power of the executive?

PALIN: Well, again, as I tried to explain last night, our executive branch will know what our job is. We have the three very distinct branches of government. You know, we might be bleeding our authority over to the Legislative or Judicial branch to do our job in the Executive branch as administers.

If that little vision of the future doesn’t scare you shitless, my darlings, you are far braver people than I. Or, perhaps, you’re feeling the effect of some big brown eyes and a flirtatious wink:

There’s been a noticeable trajectory of Republican emotion over the last five weeks when it comes to Sarah Palin. After the introduction, the right swooned.

Then she started talking. After the Charlie Gibson interview, conservatives were concerned. After the Couric interviews, Republicans started to panic.

In the wake of Palin’s odd and disjointed performance in last night’s debate, I guess they’re back to swooning again. Take this embarrassing item from the National Review’s Rich Lowry:

I’m sure I’m not the only male in America who, when Palin dropped her first wink, sat up a little straighter on the couch and said, “Hey, I think she just winked at me.” And her smile. By the end, when she clearly knew she was doing well, it was so sparkling it was almost mesmerizing. It sent little starbursts through the screen and ricocheting around the living rooms of America.

Excuse me. I think I’m going to be sick. I’ll let Hilzoy speak up for me here, while I’m worshipping porcelain:

I’m sure I’m not the only female in America who, when Palin dropped her first wink, rolled her eyes and thought: oh, dear God. We have all seen just that wink deployed at guys like Rich Lowry. We have all watched in amazement as it actually works, despite its transparent manipulativeness. What, we all wonder, could those guys possibly be thinking? (What the winking women are thinking is usually altogether too clear.) I’m betting that for every male vote that wink picked up, it lost at least one woman.

If this election comes down to men voting with their dicks, I am going to embark on a road trip throughout America and soundly beat each and every one. It will be my Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back moment. I just don’t know if it will be enough to assuage my disgust.

Happy Hour Discurso

Friday Favorite Banned Books

In honor of Banned Books Week, let’s talk about some of our favorite banned books, shall we, my darlings?

I grabbed my short list from the Wikipedia List of Most Commonly Challenged Books in the U.S. If any of you have lists from other countries, let us know in comments. Censorship is a worldwide problem. It grows like a weed, and, like a weed, needs to be pulled up and stopped before it can take deep root.

1984 by George Orwell. This wasn’t a comfortable book. Reading it felt like being bludgeoned to death by blank-faced lackeys of a dictator, and I went through a few weeks of numb fog afterward, jumping at Newspeak shadows. It brought on a mild form of PTSD. But it was one of the most valuable books I’ve ever read, and rings all too true during this Rise of American Totalitarianism.

Catch-22 by Joseph Heller. This book grabbed me by the shirt-front and yanked me in from the opening lines. “It was love at first sight. The first time Yossarian saw the chaplain he fell madly in love with him.” I can see why it would be banned for strictly medical reasons: I nearly developed a hernia from laughing so hard. I’ve never read anything else that captured the insanity of war quite so well. Brilliant!

Harry Potter series by J.K. Rowling. Yes. I admit it. I’m a Harry Potter addict. My friend Justin forced the first book on me. I’d had absolutely no intention of reading a bloody kid’s book about a boy wizard, for fuck’s sake. Immediately upon finishing it, though, I was digging my crappy old Tempo out of the snow at four in the morning and forcing the poor beast to navigate icy streets to our 24-hour Wal-Mart to buy as many of the rest as were available. I adore her way with words. I love her characters. I think the magic is awesome, and I find it simply delightful that she’s persuaded a plethora of kids to read books bigger than they are. Every life needs some magic. She delivers.

How to Eat Fried Worms by Thomas Rockwell. I read this as a kid, delightfully grossed out by the whole concept of eating worms. I took away a few lessons from it that have proved valuable throughout my life: never make a bet you wouldn’t mind losing, never be afraid to try something new as long as it’s properly cooked, and worms are a good source of protein.

The Jungle by Upton Sinclair. I read this in a single night in college. I’d never been one much for social justice, activism, unions and all that, but after suffering vicariously through the lives of those brutalized characters, I became a firm believer in all of the above, together with a healthy dose of government regulation. This book raised my consciousness more than just about anything else I’d ever read to that date. And it very nearly turned me into a vegan. I can tell you this: I’ll never see a sausage the same way ever again.

The Satanic Verses by Salman Rushdie. Another college book. I did my book report on it for my Islamic Civilization class. Honestly, I don’t remember all that much of the book itself, aside from liking it. What was most important was the fact that this book had sparked such outrage that it almost got its author killed. It was my first true introduction to the extremes of religious intolerance. And it got me in to reading other writers on Islamic themes, whom I’ve loved. There are incredible writers emerging from the Muslim world, incredible writers in their past, and none of them deserve death for what they’ve penned. Salman Rushdie remains one of my heroes to this day.

Tiger Eyes by Judy Blume. Heart-wrenching. So many parts of this book have stayed with me, from that innocent night under the trees in the back yard when young love was blooming, only to be rudely interrupted by news that the main character’s father had been shot, to her mother breaking her toes by kicking a wall in a paroxym of grief, to singing “I Cain’t Say No” in the school play. “A tiger’s eye for my Tiger Eyes.” So many beautiful moments in this book. It’s given me a lot of strength throughout the years.

To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee. This was our sophomore lit required reading, and I can’t begin to describe the relief after having to suffer through The Oxbow Incident in freshman lit. (The insult added to injury was seeing them unpack boxes of Farenheit 451, the new freshman required reading, right after I’d gratefully abandoned that other pile of shit. Barstards!) I didn’t think I’d like this one any better, but a few pages in, I got hooked and finished it in a day. Scout and her father’s brave stand against racial injustice in the deep South captivated me. I found myself pulled into a world I’d never suspected existed. It taught me to overcome my fear of “otherness” – not that a lifetime living among African Americans, Native Americans, Mexican Americans and other sundry folk hadn’t taught me that skin color is no more important than hair color, but there are still plenty of other differences. I think this book is why I wasn’t afraid to plunge into other cultures and get to know people with very strange customs. And it made me passionate about fairness and justice.

All of these books enriched my life in some way. All of them showed me the world through different eyes, and made me question basic assumptions. They reinforced my passion for the written word. Books allow us to experience lives we haven’t led. They open us wide to the world. They can change our perspectives, and make us better human beings.

Which is probably why so many of them end up being challenged by those who would rather we keep our eyes and minds firmly closed.

Fuck that. I’m going to grab myself another banned book. Point me to your favorites and join me in some freedom, my darlings.

Friday Favorite Banned Books

"An Angry Fountain of Liberal Rage"

Progressive Conservative is terrified of me, so much so that he wouldn’t participate in COTEB until it was hosted on safe ground for him. And his “plug” for the Carnival cracked me up:

For some time there has been this thing floating around called the Carnival of the Elitist Bastards. Since the founder is an angry fountain of liberal rage I can’t say I was ever that motivated to participate, despite the fact that two of my favorite fellow bloggers have. I like the premise though, which is that sometimes it’s okay to be an elitist.

This from a man who once berated me for not living up to his standards. He read this blog in its early days, and somehow formed the impression that I was not “an angry fountain of liberal rage.” When the truth could no longer be denied, he threw a fit and left. He’s been leaving whiny little comments about me on various blogs ever since. I wish I’d kept all the links. They’re precious.

It’s a signal honor to be called “an angry fountain of liberal rage” from a man who approvingly quotes Ann Coulter, who has swallowed the neocon lie that the Community Reinvestment Act led to our current economic disaster (free tip: it didn’t), and believes McCain has “ideals.” And that’s just on the one page of his blog I scanned today.

He keeps using that word “progressive.” I do not think it means what he thinks it means.

But I digress, because as fun as it is to beat up on fuckwits, I don’t put Progressive Conservative into that category. Snowed by the Cons, yes. Unclear on the concept of progressive, absolutely. But at least he makes the occasional effort to understand liberals, and he wants to see his party make a beeline for the middle, so I’ve got to give him some props. He seems to believe that disagreements over politics and religion mean I despise him. I don’t. I’ve even been nice to him over at The Coffee-Stained Writer, where his non-political commentary is perfectly agreeable. And I was delighted when he decided to jump aboard the HMS Elitist Bastard, even though, like John McCain, he refuses to meet my eyes. Let this paragraph stand as evidence of the fact that just because I find his politics laughable and his whining about me even more so doesn’t mean I don’t appreciate him as a fellow human being.

Let’s get back to the main point, then: I am indeed “an angry fountain of liberal rage.” I own that title with pride.

I’m bitterly angry. Often enraged. I’ve been running on a high-octane combination of hope and outrage this election year. I’ve embraced my leap to the left. I am now a dyed-in-the-wool progressive Democrat who will never tack center again. If Progressive Conservative needs someone to blame for that, he need look no further than George W. Bush and the raving band of batshit insane neo-theo-con fucktards he infested our political infrastructure with.

Those readers who have been with me since the beginning know I used to be a left-leaning centrist, a person utterly disinterested in politics, bored by religion, and dismissive of the culture wars. I’d never even voted before 2006. The last thing I needed to waste my time on was democracy. All candidates, I figured, were pretty much the same. Why bother to vote? I was happier staying home on election day, blissfully ignorant of the sturm und drang of politics and government. All I ever wanted or needed was my cat, my writing, and my friends.

Along came Bush, who destroyed my contentment.

I watched him piss away the worldwide outpouring of support and empathy from nearly every country on this planet, including those who had traditionally hated us. America could have been at the forefront of a new era of international cooperation and progress. Instead, he attacked a country that had nothing to do with the terrorist attacks of September 11th. He lied to America, he lied to the world, rode roughshod over every ally we had, and eliminated any chance of making this world a better place.

That wasn’t enough to get me politically engaged. But it made me long for Clinton, who may not have been able to keep it in his pants but sure as fuck knew how to raise America’s standing in the world. I will tell you why I became a Clinton supporter. I didn’t know the best of what he’d done until long after he was out of office, but I caught this moment during his presidency that told me our nation was in excellent hands. At Camp David, Yassir Arafat and Yitzhak Rabin were going to dinner. Rabin was trying to do the polite thing and let Arafat enter the dining room first. Arafat, survivor of too many assassination attempts, refused. And there they were, stuck in the doorway arguing over who should go first, until Clinton laughed and threw open the other half of the double door. Rabin and Arafat entered the dining room side-by-side.

Can you imagine Bush doing the same thing? I didn’t think so.

I hated the Iraq war. I hated Bush for using a tragedy as his excuse for finishing what Daddy started. But it wasn’t enough to slap me out of my political apathy. I didn’t vote in 2004. Kerry didn’t inspire me enough. If it had been Gore, I might have dragged myself to the polls. If I’d been an angry liberal then, even lack of inspiration wouldn’t have kept me from pulling the lever for everyone with a D after their name.

What really did it was the onslaught of abuses that followed that second election, the revelations that started coming out. I’d never wanted to live in a country that tortured human beings, and yet Bush took an enormous shit on the Geneva Conventions and all sense of decency, and we became a nation that tortures. I’d never wanted to live in a country that spied on its citizens, yet his warrantless wiretapping was gathering steam, and he didn’t see a damned thing wrong with shredding the Fourth Amendment. Iraq, far from being the cakewalk promised, was an utter disaster. Everything Bush and his lapdogs had said to get us there turned out to be lies. Our standing in the world had tanked. Countries that had been our staunch allies for decades, sometimes centuries, were turning away from us. Everything I loved about America, everything we stood for, all of our ideals, Bush flushed away.

I registered as an Independent in 2006, and voted a straight Democratic ticket. I voted my anger. I voted for a slate of people who were just as angry as I was.

These past two years, I’ve paid close attention to politics. And everything I’ve seen has only made me angrier. America’s turning into a theocracy. The frothing fundies, egged on by a president who has no respect for democracy, the rule of law, or Constitutional ideals, have come bursting out of fringe and imposed thems
elves on the mainstream. They’ve completed their takeover of the Republicon party. Four more years of Republicon rule, and I guarantee you we’ll be living in a theocracy.

The cons have destroyed our foreign policy, our economy, and our morality. They’ve attacked science, wasted precious time in fighting global warming because they either care more for Big Oil profits or believe the world’s going to end too soon for global warming to matter. They’ve turned our political discourse into an endless fullisade of smears, bald lies, and bullshit. They have no respect for ordinary Americans, choosing to exploit them instead. They’ve annihilated the middle class, robbed from the poor to give to the rich, and now blame all of our woes on minorities and poor folk. They’ve polarized the nation. They’ve installed ideologues at every level of our infrastructure. They engaged in a culture of political hirings, firings and corruption that’s breathtaking in its scope. I can’t even keep up with the constant scandals. You want to know why Americans aren’t screaming in the streets? There’s too much to scream about. Where do you even begin to protest when the list of outrages is so enormous?

They have so much contempt for America that they fielded John McCain as a candidate. They figured a lying neocon POW would deceive us into believing they’ve turned over a new leaf. And because they’re so convinced of our stupidity, they chose Sarah Palin, a Dominionist serial liar and one of the most idiotic politicians ever to disgrace the national stage, as their vice presidential candidate.

The secrecy, the lying, the naked grabs for power, power and more power, the corruption, the warmongering, the economic idiocy, the anti-science and anti-human policies, the egregious stupidity, the cynical manipulation, the propaganda, the lawbreaking, the advocation of torture, the belligerance, and the failures of this administration have been more than enough to turn me from a moderate into an angry fountain of liberal rage. All of that drove me straight into the arms of the Democratic party, where I belonged all along.

I won’t always be so outraged. Someday, this country will make it out of this wilderness, should we survive the fallout from the last eight years. We can restore our Constitution, our national ideals, our world standing, and our decency. Our economy can recover. The middle class can thrive again. America can once again become a beacon of hope and liberty in the world. I believe the Democrats will get us there. We just have to hand them the power, and keep watch lest power tempt them to stray.

It’s up to us.

I will never again trust the Republicons. My anger at the necons that brought us to this pass will ever end. Judging from what many Republican politicians have been saying, that’s not just liberal anger talking.

Rage can be a useful emotion. It prods us to action. It forces us to stand up against those who would destroy this nation for their own glorification. Rage brought me to the polls, and rage will keep me involved in American democracy. I rage against inequality, prejudice, racism, injustice. It’s part of what makes me a true progressive. And I will always have that rage.

Rage told me that I love my country. If I didn’t, the betrayal of everything America stood for wouldn’t have outraged me so much. And now, I’ll be using that rage to work for a better future for this nation, and for the world. Someday, I’ll be able to celebrate the outcome of that rage: the restoration of the American dream, the end of the neoconservative extremism that almost destroyed us, a world with a bright future.

When that day comes, I’ll be the happiest angry fountain of liberal rage you could ever hope to meet.

"An Angry Fountain of Liberal Rage"

Coming Home

Alas, the bashing of fuckery may be a bit light and/or out-of-date this weekend, my darlings – I’m flying in to Arizona to see two dear friends get married. I’m also taking the opportunity to impose on the parents. I’m sure they’ll be delighted with this last-minute announcement.

I’m going from this:


A lush paradise.

To this:


A bloody desert.

And then coming home to this:

Misha expressing her opinion of mothers who leave their kitties alone on the weekend.

I must be insane.

Coming Home

Happy Hour Discurso

Today’s opining on the public discourse.

McCain retreats from Michigan:

With about a month until Election Day, the McCain campaign has found itself with some unwelcome and uncomfortable questions to consider. The Obama campaign is stretching the map, and putting plenty of “red” states — Ohio, Florida, Iowa, New Mexico, Virginia, Nevada, North Carolina, Indiana, and Missouri — in play. McCain would love to play offensive, but with
Obama’s poll numbers looking stronger, he has to start giving up on some “blue” targets.

And according to the Politico’s Jonathan Martin, McCain will no longer try to win Michigan.

John McCain is pulling out of Michigan, according to two Republicans, a stunning move a month away from Election Day that indicates the difficulty Republicans are having in finding blue states to put in play.

McCain will go off TV in Michigan, stop dropping mail there and send most of his
staff to more competitive states, including Wisconsin, Ohio and Florida. Wisconsin went for Kerry in 2004, Ohio and Florida for Bush.


Those states he’s got to back off Michigan to defend? Let’s just say it’s a bad sign for the Republicons:

That the McCain team has quietly slipped Indiana and North Carolina onto the list of key battlegrounds that are “tied or ahead” is striking. North Carolina hasn’t voted for a Dem since 1976; Indiana, not since 1964.

What’s more, Pollster.com actually has Obama ahead in several of these key states the McCain team has already placed in their definite (and crucial) “win” column: Virginia, Florida and Ohio (where it’s virtually tied).

Asked on the call how it was that things got to the point that they were aggressively defending red states, McCain advisers offered a creative defense. They said, in essence, that they’d played rope-a-dope with Obama, spending nothing in them while letting Obama advertise aggressively in them in order to waste his money.

“One of the strategic decisions our campaign has made is to let Mr. Obama spend his resources until we got closer to the election,” Strimple said. Those states, he added, “will snap back aggressively in our favor.”

For the McCain camp to be conceding that the must-win battleground is comprised of red states, some of which Obama holds leads in, and that two states that haven’t voted Dem in decades are now real battlegrounds, doesn’t seem like a very strong position at all.


Not. Even. A. Little. Let’s just forget the lipstick-on-a-pig defense that they were letting Obama have his way. That shouldn’t have mattered a bit in solid red states. The fact that they’re forced to defend safe ground is striking. And, to me, vastly entertaining.

Looks like the electorate isn’t quite as stupid as they’d hoped. Heh. Heh heh.

And it could be that they’re getting a little fed up with rampant Republicon corruption. It seems like nearly every agency under Bush has become a scandal-plagued joke. Today, the FDA joins the list:

After nearly eight years, it’s tempting to think we probably wouldn’t see any new corruption scandals out of the Bush administration — but think again. Last month, it was the Interior Department’s Minerals Management Service, where an anything-goes atmosphere led to Caligula-like corruption and debauchery. Today, it’s contract corruption at the FDA.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration had an image problem. For months last year the agency had been pummeled by Congress for poor inspections of tainted vegetables, drugs and other products.

FDA leaders decided to hire a contractor for a public relations campaign that would “create and foster a lasting positive public image of the agency for the American public,” according to agency documents.

A competition, as prescribed by government policy, was not held to get the lowest bid for the $300,000 contract. Instead, FDA officials came up with a plan to ensure the work would go to a Washington public relations firm with ties to the FDA official arranging the deal, according to an examination by The Washington Post.


All right. So they went about hiring a contractor in an utterly corrupt way, and that’s news, but I just want to point out another facet here: instead of fixing problems, instead of restoring trust by doing a better job, the FDA hired a public relations firm to shore up their fucking public image.

We don’t need to feel good about them. We need them to do their fucking jobs right. But in Bush’s world, impressions mean more than reality. If you can’t wow the public with competence, woo ’em with bullshit.

For fuck’s sake.

And now they want us to believe another fairy tale:

In May, controversial former Justice Department official Hans Von Spakovsky withdrew his name from consideration for the Federal Election Commission, following months of opposition from lawmakers and civil rights groups. Since then, Spakovsky has busied himself by
writing opinion pieces for conservative news outlets like the
Wall Street Journal and National Review.

In an article for the right-wing Human Events today, Spakovsky criticizes efforts by Sen. Barack Obama’s (D-IL) presidential campaign to get attack ads by the “American Issues Project” off of
TV, saying that the “actions sho
uld cause every American to ask,
can Obama be trusted with the powers of the Justice Department.” Spakovsky claims that the Justice Department under Obama would be “partisan and politically-biased”…

[snip]

Spakovsky’s worries are ironic given that six of his former Justice Department colleagues wrote to the Senate Rules Committee in June 2007, claiming that he “injected partisan political factors into decision-making” when he ran the Voting Section of the DoJ’s Civil Rights
Division. Critics say Spakovsky used every opportunity “to make it difficult for voters —
poor, minority and Democratic — to go to the polls,” including pushing through Texas re-districting
that violated the Voting Rights Act.


Oh, yeah. Just the person qualified to tell us Obama would politicize the Justice Department. You’ve noticed they have a remarkable propensity for projecting their own tendencies and failings onto their opponents, right?

They really do think the American public doesn’t have a single functioning brain cell between them. They’re about to be proved very wrong indeed.

In final news, the long-anticipated Biden/Palin debate has begun. I’ll have highlights for ye later.

Happy Hour Discurso

A Valuable Synopsis of the U.S. Attorney Firings Scandal

On Monday, the Office of the Inspector General released a report on the politicized firings of several United States Attorneys by the Bush Regime. Talking Points Memo brings the whole sordid saga together in one easy-to-read, essential report. Some highlights:

Almost since the scandal broke early last year, there have been clear signs that the plan to fire U.S. attorneys as a means of advancing the Bush administration’s political goals was being driven by the White House. That impression has been strengthened as top current and former White House officials, including Karl Rove and Harriet Miers, have consistently stonewalled efforts to look into the matter.

[snip]

The White House’s active involvement in the firings, as depicted in the [OIG] report, can be divided into two broad categories: First, its role in initiating and promoting the overall plan to remove an unspecified number of U.S. attorneys — traditionally treated as apolitical prosecutors who operate independently from the political agenda of the administration — deemed insufficiently committed to the Bush agenda. And second, its apparent work in pushing specifically for several of the most high-profile dismissals.

[snip]

Kyle Sampson, Gonzales’ then chief of staff at DOJ, and the point man on the firing plan, told OIG investigators that, some time after the 2004 election, White House counsel Harriet Miers asked him whether the administration should try to get all 93 U.S. attorneys to resign, as part of a plan to replace all political appointees for the new term. Sampson said he argued against this idea.

[snip]

Still, the White House seems to have kept pressing. In January 2005, Sampson received an email from a Miers deputy, which said: “Karl Rove stopped by “to ask … ‘how we planned to proceed regarding US Attorneys, whether we are going to allow all to stay, request resignations from all and accept only some of them, or selectively replace them, etc.’ ” [Quotation marks rendered as in the report]. A few days later, Sampson replied: “If Karl [Rove] thinks there would be political will to do it, then so do I.”

The following month, Sampson told OIG, Miers followed up, asking him for a list of possible U.S. attorneys to get rid of. Sampson dutifully responded with his first list, which contained the names of four USAs who ultimately were axed, as well as ten who weren’t.

[snip]

The dismissal in which the White House played the greatest role was that of Bud Cummins, US Attorney for the Eastern District of Arkansas. Cummins, the report makes clear, was removed not because of shortcomings in his own record, either political or performance-based, but because the White House wanted to move a GOP political operative, Timothy Griffin, in to the job.

[snip]

The White House’s role in the firing of David Iglesias as U.S. attorney for the District of New Mexico appears to have been less direct than that of Cummins – but the report makes clear that it was involved nonetheless.

[snip]

At a November 15 White House meeting, Wilson put in another complaint to Rove about Iglesias. This time, he told her: “That decision has already been made. He’s gone.” But as the report notes, the first list from Sampson to include Iglesias’ name would not be sent to Miers until a few hours later. In other words, Rove’s knowledge that Iglesias was to be fired suggests this wasn’t a decision made solely by DOJ.

Read the whole thing. It paints a concise and terrifying picture of a White House determined to create an army of U.S. Attorneys slavishly loyal to them.

Law enforcement is too powerful and too essential to a civilized society to politicize. Police, attorneys and judges need to be loyal to the law, not partisian ideology. Democracy can’t survive when the long arm of the law is wielded by a political party.

We need to push for the truth in this, and we need to ensure that the partisan hacks who were installed during Bush’s rule are bunged out on their ears.

A Valuable Synopsis of the U.S. Attorney Firings Scandal

Biden vs. Palin: a Preview

This video should tell you exactly who’s bringing the sizzle and who’s bringing the steak to tonight’s debates:


Biden can discuss Supreme Court decisions intelligently and in depth. Palin vomits forth a loosely-connected stream of platitudes, personal impressions, and smoke.

There is no contest here. Palin is not the droid you are looking for.

Biden vs. Palin: a Preview

Will Protest 4 Beer

The next time you see a group of young Americans holding up Republicon-supporting signs at a political event, you might want to ask them how much money was paid for their principled stand:

In hopes of organizing a robust demonstration for the vice presidential debate this Thursday in St. Louis, the pro-Iraq War (and ostensibly pro-McCain) organization, Vets for Freedom, is resorting to offering local college fraternities hundreds of dollars if their members come and hold signs.

In an email obtained by the Huffington Post, Vets for Freedom field staffer Laura Meyer offered a fraternity at St. Louis University a “sizable donation” – plus free lunch – if it could use their pledges to demonstrate outside the VP debate.

“I was emailing you today,” wrote Meyer, “because I am trying to find people who would be willing to hold up signs for a few hours in the afternoon this Thursday outside the VP debate site. It’s only for a few hours and you can gain a lot from it….”

Note to idiotic organizations: your political philosophy is bankrupt when you have to pay pledges to promote it.

Allow me to coin a slogan: America’s Right Wing: Making a Mockery of Democracy Since Their Inception.

Will Protest 4 Beer

Happy Hour Discurso

Today’s opining on the public discourse.

I’m sorry. I have to do it. The ongoing Palin disaster is increasingly incredible, and I haven’t the strength or the will to look away.

I should be talking about the Senate’s dubious decision to ram through a noxious bailout bill (ooo, let’s include tax cuts for the wealthy! That’ll help!). I should be talking about the new revelations in the attorney general firings (actually, I’ll get to that later). But we’re going to ease off and have some fun at Sarah Palin’s expense.

Yes, I am not ashamed to pluck the low-hanging fruit.

Remember how Palin said that big, bad Putin was encroaching on U.S. airspace, and that made her all kinds of expert in foreign policy? Heh, well, you’ll be astounded to learn this, but that’s completely and totally fucking wrong:

The McCain-Palin campaign recently clarified Gov. Sarah Palin’s (R-AK) remark from last week that “Putin rears his head and comes into the airspace of the United States of America.” The campaign told CBS News, “Russian incursions…inside the air defense identification zone have occurred.” But as the Associated Press reports today, no such incursions have occurred ‘in
recent years’:

The air defense identification zone, almost completely over water, extends 12-mile past the perimeter of the United States. … However, no Russian military planes have been flying even into that zone, said Maj. Allen Herritage, a spokesman for the Alaska region of the North American Aerospace Defense Command, at Elmendorf Air Force Base. “To be very clear, there has not been any incursion in U.S. airspace in recent years,” Herritage said.


At this point, I think two things are clear. One, the McCain campaign is a bunch of rank amateurs when it comes to foreign policy. Two, they are not capable of telling the truth. Ever. Not even a little bit.

In light of this, you’ll be interested to learn that McCain, the self-proclaimed leading expert in foreign policy, has a new foreign policy advisor. It is… Sarah Palin:

John McCain chatted with NPR this morning, and during the interview, the senator made a very odd remark about where he’s turned for foreign policy advice.

NPR: Given what you’ve said, senator, is there an occasion where you could imagine turning to Gov. Palin for advice in a foreign policy crisis?

McCain: I’ve turned to her advice many times in the past. I can’t imagine turning to Senator Obama or Senator Biden because they’ve been wrong. They were wrong about Iraq, wrong about Russia.


Obviously, this is silly. But more importantly, I don’t think McCain appreciates how much this undermines his own campaign’s message. For a year and a half, McCain, his aides, and his surrogates have insisted that McCain is an unrivaled expert when it comes to foreign policy and national security. It’s a bogus claim — McCain has been strikingly confused on international affairs throughout his campaign — but it’s been the principal selling point of McCain’s candidacy from the outset.

Talking to NPR, however, McCain tried out an entirely new line — he, the expert, turns to his novice running mate, who has no foreign policy experience at all, for advice. In fact, he’s already done so “many times.”


Excuse me? “Turned to her advice many times in the past”? What fucking past? What fucking advice? Is she the one who told you that Obama and Biden have been wrong about Iraq and Russia? If so, I’d stop fucking listening now. You see, Biden’s foreign policy chops are a huge part of what got him on the ticket to begin with, and Obama’s been so right on Iran that even Bush has had to step up and follow his lead. So, Johnny, if you wouldn’t trust them, but you’d trust Sarah “I Can See Russia From Here!” Palin, there is something dramatically wrong with you.

Oh, wait. We already knew that. Nevermind.

McCain is turning to advice from a woman who can’t even handle the media. Palin’s incoherence in interviews has become so pronounced that the campaign announced it wouldn’t allow any more “gotcha” journalism from those big meanies like Gibson and Couric. Now, they’re going to stick with friendlier territory:

The Charlie Gibson interview didn’t go well. The interviews with Katie Couric became legendary — and not in a good way.

So, what will the McCain campaign do to get Sarah Palin’s message out? There’s a new plan.

Sarah Palin’s interview Tuesday with conservative talker Hugh Hewitt gave the vice presidential candidate a chance to showcase elements of her life story and demonstrate some of the folksiness that’s been central to her political success.

It’s exactly the kind of interview that voters can expect to see from the governor in the coming weeks, according to a Palin adviser, who recognized that there is hunger in Republican circles and among the public at large to see a less-scripted, more authentic candidate. That means more comfortable settings like conservative talk radio, and fewer opportunities for Palin to stumble, as was the case with a pair of high-profile network interviews with ABC and CBS.

“We’re going to be continue to put her in settings where she has an opportunity to shine, to be on offense,” the adviser said. “We’ve gotten very good feedback from the public from Hugh Hewitt interview.”

Ah, yes, the Hewitt interview. Hewitt, for those of you unfamiliar with his work, is a prominent Republican blogger and talk-show hos
t. Andrew Sullivan recently
named an award after him: “The Hewitt Award — named after the absurd partisan fanatic, Hugh Hewitt, is given for the
most egregious attempts to label Barack Obama as un-American, alien, treasonous, and far out of the mainstream of American life and politics.”


That’s right. When you can’t face up to the real(ish) journalists, run to the loving arms of the cons. That’s showing some real confidence in your ability to face opposition. Riiight.

And, just so’s you know, Sarah “Pit Bull” Palin doesn’t need no stinking coaches:

On Monday, Sarah Palin told Katie Couric that voters are going to have to decide between “new energy” and “new ideas” on one side, or “many, many years in the Senate” on
the other. Obama vs. McCain? No, she was talking about Palin vs. Biden, seemingly unaware of the dynamic at the top of the ticket.

CBS just sent out a transcript from this morning’s “Early Show,” in which Palin touched on a very similar theme.

COURIC: I know you’re heading to Sedona to work on your debate. What is your coach advising you?

PALIN: I don’t have a debate coach.

COURIC: Well, what are your coaches?

PALIN: I have quite a few people who are giving us information about the record of Obama and Biden, and at the end of the day, though, it is — it’s so clear, again, what those choices are. Either new ideas, new energy and reform of Washington, DC, or more of the same.


First, if she doesn’t have debate coaches, I’m the Heavyweight Champion of the World.

Second, and more importantly, Palin seems strikingly unaware of what this campaign is all about. As she sees it, John McCain represents “new ideas” and “new energy,” while Barack Obama represents “more of the same.”


Someone had better get Palin some coaches stat. Because she can’t answer simple interview questions, and she has no fucking clue she’s parroting Obama’s lines about McCain.

What a total fuckwit. She makes me ashamed to possess two X chromosomes.

Happy Hour Discurso