I Don't Get It. I Don't Understand.

Confession: I was, for a few brief months in my teens, a Bible-thumper.  So it may seem odd now that I can’t get myself into the minds of believers.

I’d never been a religious kid, not particularly.  I had this nebulous idea that God existed and that he was good.  I prayed when things were beyond my control.  But we didn’t go to church, and outside of the illustrated children’s Bible I had, there wasn’t a huge amount of God stuff around.  My parents believed, and my mother put me in a summer Bible camp once – maybe for religious instruction, maybe just because it was the best and only way to pawn me off on other people for a couple of hours so she could have some time for herself.  Considering she played Mom to the entire neighborhood, one can’t blame her for needing a break.  And I learned how to glue Jesus to a wooden spoon, and stick him in a walnut shell, so it wasn’t a complete waste.  One thing I do know, the people there didn’t impress upon me the necessity of believing or going to Hell.  They gave me warm fuzzy feelings about Jesus and an indelible association between ancient Jewish carpenters and spoons.

Then we moved to Page.  I’ve seldom lived in a city so religious.  There was a road completely lined with churches, and more churches scattered around the city, and I believe there were 2.5 churches for every household.  Kids were released for seminary in the afternoons if they belonged to the Mormon church, and nearly everyone belonged to the Mormon church.  Didn’t impress me.  People would pester me about which church I belonged to, and when I told them “none,” they’d then interrogate me about my beliefs.  I finally told them I was Tarlonian just to shut them the hell up.  It seemed easier to believe in a faith I’d made up, anyway.  It wasn’t that the Bible stories I’d read as a kid had put me off.  It was the believers, and that creepy way they had of insisting that everyone who didn’t believe just like them was going straight to hell.  I didn’t know much about God, but I figured all-knowing and all-loving meant he didn’t have much interest in condemning good people to an eternity of suffering.  When people started going on about religion, they got damned annoying.  Church, I decided, rotted brains.  Easier to be a good Christian if one avoided Christian churches.

But you couldn’t avoid such things in Page.  It came down to a choice between getting dragged there by an acquaintance I didn’t like and a rather closer friend, so I plumped for the friend.  I went on a Wednesday night, and wore my usual uniform: ripped jeans, steel-tipped boots, metal t-shirt and Slaughter headband (yes, this was the 90s).  My friend was appalled.  “Are you really going to wear that?”

Well yes, yes, I was.  If I couldn’t be accepted as a child of God despite my attire, then I’d know I didn’t belong there, wouldn’t I?

So we went, and we sat, and I got narrow looks from a lot of people.  This was a Holy Roller church.  This was Wednesday night.  Only the rabidly faithful were there.  They didn’t know what to do about this headbanger in their midst.

But Pastor Lynn Peters did.  He walked over, shook my hand, smiled, and said, “It’s wonderful to see you here.”  I’ll tell you something.  Lynn Peters was one of the kindest, most generous, least-judgmental people I’ve ever met in my life, and one of the first things that ever shook my faith in God was the fact he had to leave the congregation to get treatment for cancer.  Where was the justice in that?  Where was God when Pastor Peters needed him?

But for a little while, I fell under the spell.  I believed.  I was saved, and God was great, and I wanted everyone to share that good news.  My friend was overjoyed.

For a few months, I read my Bible and read Christian fiction and tried to live the way God wanted.  I went to church every Sunday.  And that was the first step on the road to becoming an atheist, because if you are a decent human being with half a critical-thinking brain cell left, you cannot sit in church during testimony and hear, “God healed my radio!” without thinking, “Holy fuck.  Millions of children starving and dying in Africa, Pastor Peters dying of cancer, and more tragedies than you can keep up with on the evening news, and God takes the time out of his busy schedule to heal a fucking radio?”  But it had to be true.  She’d tried and tried to fix it, but it didn’t start working until she laid her hands upon it and prayed God to heal it.  And lo, the radio was healed!

But that was just one silly woman, so my shaken-faithed self kept coming back to church, and my persistence was rewarded one day by the youth group hammering on M.C. Hammer for having some dude in a red devil costume in a video.  Yes, that M.C. Hammer.  The Christian preacher one.  But according to our youth group, he was spawn of Satan because he had some dude in a red devil costume in a music video.

I walked out and didn’t come back.

Some people may get the idea that it’s science that made me an atheist, or perhaps the evil influence of PZ.  Truth is, I was an atheist long before that.  It was a long, slow slide.  I held on to my faith, even despite some pretty intense shakes and a breakup with God or two.  Like an abusive relationship, though, I kept going back to him.  And I can’t for the life of me remember why.

I’ll tell you what made me an atheist.  Seeing how different Christian sects treated each other, every one of the hundreds and thousands of them having the exclusive line on Truth, each sect the only who knew God’s True Will.  Seeing how conservative Christianity had very nearly destroyed my best friend’s self-confidence, sense of self-worth, and really fucked up his ideas of sexuality.  Seeing how so many different religions all came up with different answers to the ultimate questions of why are we here, who are the gods, and what do the gods want us to do.  If other religions were myths, then why wasn’t Christianity?

But still I held on to God.  Clung to a Karen Armstrong type nebulous deity Somewhere Out There.  I was sure it was the Christian god.  Then I couldn’t be sure anymore.  After years of being pulled in a thousand different directions, I finally chose a different path.  I decided to explore other notions of the Divine in earnest.  I’d give up Christianity for good.  But before I did that, I prayed.  I said, “God, if this is the wrong path to take, show me, and I’ll turn right back.”  I never got a sign.  So I never turned back.

I worshiped Odin for a while, but mostly in good fun.  Beside, he was so much more awesome than the God of the Bible.  Did the Lord give his eye for wisdom?  No.  He already knew shit, and yet didn’t seem to know shit.  How boring.

Explored Hinduism and Taoism and Buddhism, all of which made far more sense than Christianity ever had.  But somewhere along the way, without my realizing it, I stopped believing in the reality of the supernatural.  I’d stopped believing in UFOs and ghosts and faeries, too.  Quite enough that myths and stories were beautiful and fun and made me think about what it meant to be human.  I didn’t need to believe there was anyone out there watching over me anymore.  And I really don’t even know how that happened.  The transition was too natural to take especial note of.

I started calling myself agnostic, and then one night I took the God Delusion Index test, and had to admit that I wasn’t even that anymore.  No, folks, I was pure-D Atheist.  And since then, since I admitted that, I’ve been free to explore the real wonders of the world.  Without guilt.  Without worrying about where God fits in.  Without dealing with all this NOMA shit.

And I’ll tell you something, and this is the point of all of this: the world is a far more wondrous place without deities.

I am overwhelmed every day by the scope of the universe.  It beggars the imagination.  There are things in it that we didn’t even suspect until we started looking at it with telescopes and mathematics and probes.  There are things more beautiful, more majestic, more awe-inspiring and powerful and terrible, than anything I’ve ever read in a holy book.  And when I look at pictures from Hubble, when I read about new discoveries in physics or watch a lunar eclipse, when I learn what we know about those things, I cannot imagine why on earth anyone would need to inject gods into the equation.  They feel distinctly surplus to requirements.  They feel tacky.  It’s like putting tinsel on th

e Queen’s tiara.  Some people look at this stuff and say, “Wow, what an awesome God we have, he created all this!”  And I say God didn’t have the imagination for it.  Not any God I’ve ever heard of.  Not one that stands apart from its creation.  It’s tinsel on tiaras, people.  It’s something humans, not the universe, needs, these gods.

It’s biology, not God, that made me appreciate all creatures great and small.  Evolutionary fucking biology, people.  Back when I was a believer, I’d see a spider, and promptly squish one of God’s own creations.  I sacrificed cockroaches to Odin.  When I fell under the sway of Buddhism, I started feeling vaguely guilty about it.  Fellow creature, after all.  But after studying up on evolution, I see a spider, and I’m enthralled.  They’re magnificent little things.  They’re captivating.  And there’s a story in them, of mutation and selection and a long, slow trip from single-celled critter to these beings who do utterly remarkable things like spinning webs and eating other magnificent critters.

It’s geology, not God, that made me appreciate landscapes.  God didn’t take away my fear of volcanoes, vulcanology did.  There are rocks in my house that could be beautiful to no one other than someone who knows a little something about geology.  There’s stories in the most boring bit of mudstone.  There are other worlds, vanished worlds, contained within the humblest of rocks.  Pick one up, and I used to be holding something created by God.  It hardly seemed worth bothering with, and I’d toss it aside.  Now, I cradle these nondescript brown rocks in my hands, and I see ancient mudflats.  I see the young Earth.  I see star stuff.  I am holding thirteen-plus billion years of history every time I pick up a bit of stone, because every bit has a pedigree that stretches all the way back to the Big Bang.  You religious folks want to tell me the rantings of goat herders have anything to add to that?  I don’t see it.  I don’t get it.  I don’t understand.

I vaguely remember the chasm in my life.  I vaguely remember needing so much to believe in something supernatural, frantically searching for it in myth and religion and pseudoscience, because the world seemed so mundane without magic.  But magic abounds.  There’s magic in an equation.  There’s something divine in chemistry.  Any of the sciences provide more wonder than all of the religions of the world combined.  I didn’t know that, back when religion was presented as the only way to become fully human and science was a useful something we should respect, but a mere human endeavor and not worthy of worship.  What I didn’t realize was that worship is surplus to requirements.  One does not, despite reports, need worship to become fully human.  One does not need the supernatural.  There is quite enough super in the natural, thank you ever so much.

And so now I struggle.  I struggle to comprehend why people cling so tightly to their belief that myth is really real.  I don’t remember why that felt so necessary, and I fail to see how anyone can drink even a few sips of science and need anything more. Why this overriding urge to tinsel tiaras?  Why Biologos and all of the other ridiculous attempts to reconcile science with religion?  Why this death-grip on the rantings of goat herders?  Why this insistence that the fiction be true?  I don’t get it.  I don’t understand.

I wish I did.  Not because I have a hole to fill, or because I envy the believers, but because that stubborn clinging to faith leads to so much misery and denial and danger.  Because it hurts so many of us so.  And because I’m curious as to why, when surrounded by the riches of the universe, one would choose to remain so impoverished.

I Don't Get It. I Don't Understand.
{advertisement}

Accretionary Wedge #30: Bake Sale Madness

Only for you lot would I whip out my long-neglected electric mixer and put my poor, long-suffering intrepid companion through an afternoon of baking, grumbling, decorating, more grumbling…  Damn it, Jim, I’m a writer, not a baker!

What I would’ve liked to end up with was a model of the Cascades in miniature.  What we’ve got is a generic sort of cirque glacier thingy.



Looking back on it, we should’ve done it with two cakes: a nice round stacked on top would’ve given me a better shot at mountains.  So it goes.  Use your imaginations.

Anyway.  We’ve got some features of a glacier going on.  I even annotated the photo for ye!



As you can see, we’ve got a wee little cirque glacier spilling down a (work with me, people!) mountainside.  It’s in retreat!  You can tell because it’s left behind a nice terminal moraine, which its outwash stream has breached.  This, along with the fact I didn’t buy a lot of blue icing, explains why there’s no lake piled up behind the moraine.

The stream itself is the typical braided type you so often see draining meltwater from glaciers.  I would’ve tried to mimic the milky appearance of rock flour in the water, but decided it wasn’t worth the risk.  Besides, we wanted cake!

It was nearly impossible to photograph, so I haven’t got a good example, but the bottom part of the glacier’s created a nice, U-shaped valley, even.  And I’m sure you’ve noticed all the little brown flecks in the glacier.  Ice is covered in rockfall, y’see.  It’s very dirty ice.  And very tasty, too!

Right, then.  That’s it.  Mixer’s being retired again.  And the next time we hold a bake sale, I’m going with my original idea – breccia.  Or possibly a nice tillite.

Accretionary Wedge #30: Bake Sale Madness

ETEV Geo-Posts Lexicon

Silver Fox posed me a question on Twitter that sent me on an hours-long gallop through ye olde blog:

You’ve been blogging for quite a while, when did you start doing rock posts and other related geo-type subjects?

I couldn’t remember.  Been doing this since March of 2008, and it’s almost 3,200 posts under the bridge since then.  I’d started with pollyticks mostly, along with a heaping helping of bashing on IDiots, and only gradually transitioned to the current mix.  And I have the attention span of a meth-addicted Jack Russell Terrier combined with the memory of a brain-damaged goldfish (I exaggerate only a little), so it’s hard to cast my pathetic excuse for a mind back to those misty days of almost three years ago and remember just what the hell I was doing.  

I’m sunk if I ever get hauled in by the police, people.  They’ll ask me what I was doing on the evening of X, and I’ll have to say I’ve no idea.  They’ll ask me if I ever met so-and-so, and I’ll say no, and they’ll whip out some incriminating photo showing me with X, and they won’t believe me when I tell them I didn’t remember X’s name and have only a vague idea of the circumstances under which that photo was taken.  But I digress.  See: attn span of meth-addict JR above.


I took a gallop through my science-tagged posts in an attempt to answer Silver Fox’s question, and having worked up some momentum, I took a run at the entire opus.  If you’ve ever wanted links to all of my geo-related posts, then this is the post for you!


If you want a sampling of all my science-related posts, simply click the “Science” tag at the end of this post, or find it in Labels in the sidebar.  Enjoy!




Scenes from the Juan de Fuca Plate


Unterseevulkan!  


Starring Geology  


“Intense Discovery” 


Sunset Crater


Volcanoes from Space


Arizona Rockhounding


Shocking Truth About Aftershocks


Getting Acquainted with Agassiz Parte the First


Getting Acquainted with Agassiz Parte the Second


Crystal Delight


A Funny Thing Happened While I Was Searching Google Images…


How You Know You’re a Geologist at Heart


A Geology Buff at Home Depot


Geology Strikes Again


I Smell Abject Ignorance


Getting My Rocks On


Happy 30th Anniversary, Mount Saint Helens


Oregon Geology Parte the First


Geologist to YECs: “Shh Even Before You Start!”


Relative Dangers


Oregon Geology Parte the Second


Whither Geology?


Fangirl Gets Noticed by the Rock Stars, Freaks the Hell Out


Life on the Rocks


Whiskey on the Rocks


Some Preliminary Geological Findings


Things I Found in the Twitterverse


Wither Geology? National Parks Edition


Things That Caught My Attention


Things That Made Me Go, “HOLY FUCKING SHIT!”


SIWOTI Syndrome: Gabbro Edition


Seward Park: A Scientific Wonderland


The Crash of Continents, the Whisper of Water


The Poetry and Prose of Ellen Morris Bishop


Strata to Make Your Heart Sing


Geological Humor.  Plus, Choices


Pop Rocks


Accretionary Wedges


Geoblogosphere Samplings


Volcanoes and Debris Flows and Experts, Oh My!


The Wolf in the Fault and Other Stories


Geo Linkfest!


Captain’s Log Supplemental: Mary’s Peak I


The Columns Became


AW #27 Now Available


Geology in Bed, at Work, and at a Friend’s Place


Test Driving with Geology


Do Ya Think I’m Bluffing, Punk?  Well, Do Ya?


Wherein I Do Some Geology All By My Lonesome


Oh, Schist! And Other Stories


Great Scarp!  Seattle Has Faults!


One of the Most Beautiful Things I Have Ever Seen


Such Civil War Is In My Love and Hate


Geocandy: Earth Fall Down and Go Boom


Bedrock Bonanza


For Those Who Missed It


Sands of Time


I Need a Geology Degree


Why (Part of) the World Is Flat


The Allure of the Orcas Chert and How to Keep Undergarments Fresh in the Field


The World is Weird


Christmas Rocks


The Quote Detective


Oregon Geology Parte the Third


Building a Better World: Ice Caves


And there it is.  Those who click on the “science” tag will notice that ye olde blog focused rather heavily on biology and astronomy, along with a smattering of climate stuff, at the beginning.  That wasn’t merely a result of falling under PZ and Phil’s respective spells – it was because I was frantically catching up on biology after neglecting it for years, and I’ve always had a soft spot for stars.  But between exploring a bit of the geology round these parts and visiting ye olde home state of Arizona, where geology is on spectacular display, my focus started shifting more and more toward one of my old, great loves.  Then the geoblogosphere adopted me, and the rest is history.


This year, I plan on dabbling my toes in chemistry, and I have some work to do on climate and weather for ye olde magnum opus, along with who knows what else shall come up.  Expect to see quite the variety of science as 2011 goes on – but we won’t be skimping on geology.  


So much delicious science, so little time!  If anyone knows someone with gobs and oodles of money they don’t know what to do with, please do inform them that a blogger/author in Seattle would like to make some suggestions.  ;-)

ETEV Geo-Posts Lexicon

Oregon Geology Parte the Fifth: Land o' Lincoln (City)

You would think that, having spent the day driving down from Seattle, climbing to the tip-top of the Astoria Column for a panoramic look at the geology around the mouth of the Columbia River, exploring Ecola State Park, and wandering about Hug Point’s geology both north and south until the tide chased us away, I’d be sleeping in a bit the next day.

You would be wrong.

I popped wide awake just around five in the morning.  Now, I could’ve tried to go back to sleep, or read a bit, but there was this ocean less than a mile away.  So out of bed I bounced, and promptly found out that the parking lots for the beaches don’t open until 6 in the ay-em.

Bugger.

What to do but drive about aimlessly, and run into the reason why Lincoln City bears its name?

Lincoln Statue

Lincoln’s actually the reason why Lincoln City’s called Lincoln City, because the city’s named after Lincoln County, and Lincoln County got its name from none other than Abraham Lincoln.  And the city shall always be called Lincoln City because of this statue.  The artist, Anna Hyatt Huntington, made that one of her conditions when she gave it to the city.

I’ve always liked Lincoln, ever since I was a wee little girl.  I liked him before I found out all that stuff about him being a great leader and freeing slaves and so forth.  I liked him because of this:

Abraham Lincoln: The Marine Layer Stops Here

He always had his nose in a book.  Would do anything to get his hands on a book.  Read anywhere and everywhere.  “Abraham Lincoln did it, too!” is a powerful argument in defense of one’s obsessive reading habits.  Those weird enough to prefer the Midwest over the West can call upon Lincoln for backup, too: the little plaque on this statue mentions that he could’ve been the governor of Oregon Territory, but he politely told those offering the position to stuff it. 

Now, you may be thinking, “But what about the beach?!”  Well, we’ve actually been standing on it this whole time. 

Dig beneath the concrete, pavements, buildings, and landscaping, and you’ll find Pleistocene sand and dunes.  Dig far enough, and you’ll hit Tertiary mudstones.  And that tells a story of tectonic uplift that spans hundreds of thousands of years, while the sea level bobbed and dipped in response to the waxing and waning of ice ages.  During the Pleistocene, the sea level sometimes rose higher than it is today.  Waves eroded nice, flat beaches on ye olde Tertiary bedrock, carving wave-cut platforms.  Higher seas deposited sand all over the nice new platform.  Wind picked up sand and busily built dunes.  Then, glaciers (and the land) rose, seas fell, and a lovely flat marine terrace got left behind, while the sea busily went to work carving a new wave-cut platform and created a new beach at the feet of the old.

Bluffs and Beach

And it’s finally 6 in the ay-em, so we can head to the current beach rather than the fossil one.  Here we are at the “D” River Beach Wayside, where we can discuss a hell of a lot of geology in one short space, while the sun rises behind us.

Note those sea cliffs to the left.  They get up to more than a hundred feet high, and if you wander over for a closer inspection, you’ll see they’re composed of terrace sandstone, topped with a dollop of dune sand.  Near-vertical, bald bluffs get carved into those (geologically) young Pleistocene sediments by waves, stress-release fracturing, rainfall, groundwater seepage, and graffiti.  Indeed, graffiti.  That is, in fact, the main reason for the bluffs’ retreat inland: people carve crap into the cliffs, kids dig caves, and the next thing you know, the cliff face is weakened enough to fall down and go boom.  Hard to believe, innit?  But you might want to mention to anyone you see out carving away that the homeowners up top might get very annoyed when their house follows the falling bits down onto the beach.

Let’s have a look at this beach, because it’s an interesting feature.  It’s what’s known as a dissipative beach, and you’ll see why in this photo:

Marching Waves

Stand here for a few moments and watch the waves hurtle up the broad, barely-sloped beach.  Watch them lined up along the entire length, which by Oregon standards goes on forever.  By the time they make it partway up the beach, they’re exhausted.  The most they can do on a normal day is merely nibble the toes of the bluffs, if even that; in fact, conditions are generally mild enough that talus accumulates at the base of the cliffs, sometimes lounging on the beach for years.  During severe storms coupled with a high tide, when waves can be dozens of feet high (and one wave on one memorable occasion measured 95ft, nearly as tall as the tallest cliff), the talus gets swept out.  Even then, waves don’t mount a direct assault on the cliffs, and never does manage to undercut them.  For a while, though, bits fall off the cliffs at a higher rate, until a new respectable pile of talus builds up.

Those winter storms, incidentally, don’t remove just talus.  The whole beach goes away, revealing the silt-and-sandstones of the Nestucca Formation.  For a while, you can wander about on Eocene bedrock, until the sand comes swooshing back.

And you know what’s really wild?  Might as well never have happened at all.  Sand sweeps up the beach in one direction in summer and in another during the winter.  It gets poked, prodded, rolled and razzed by the waves.  And yet the net littoral drift of all that harassed sand is a big fat 0.  Zero.  Nada.

Look north for the reason:

Headed Off at the Headland

Ah, yes, our old friends the rocky headlands!  We’re in the shadow of the Columbia River Basalts even here, where you’re surrounded by sand and sedimentary stone.  You see, those lovely hard volcanic headlands have nosed their way into deep enough water, and there are sufficiently many of them all up and down the coast, that they’ve formed pocket beaches nearly the entire length of Oregon.  Some of those pocket beaches are long, like the one at Lincoln City, and some are tiny, but they’re all little kingdoms unto themselves.  Oregon’s sand is not allowed to flee.  Not for long, anyway.

Have a look at the fine sand here:



You’ve got your basic quartz and feldspar, and a few minerals that tell us a lot of this sand eroded from the Klamath Mountains, along with bits from the Coast Ranges and suchlike.  The really neat thing about this is, the sand here isn’t the same as sand elsewhere on the Oregon coast.  Those little pocket beaches jealously guard their sources.  On some beaches, you’ll find sands eroded from the local headlands, some more long distance; some coarse, some fine.  The coarse stuff especially, which erodes from the sea cliffs, doesn’t seem to have got much of a look-in before about 300 years ago, when the enormous subduction zone earthquake that sent a tsunami to Japan lowered bits of the Oregon coast and thus led to some pretty vigorous sea cliff erosion action.  Neat, eh?

The time has come to reveal why this is the “D” River Beach Wayside:

A River Runs Through It

The time has come to introduce you to the D River, which has been claimed by some as the world’s shortest river.  There’s even a sign that says so, so it must be true.

Evidence

Here it is very nearly in its entirety:

D River East
D River Central
D River West
D River and the Sea

Long View of a Short River

There was a time when it was known simply as “the outlet,” before a contest decided that the world’s shortest river deserved the world’s shortest name.  And an outlet is about all it is – the thing’s only 440 feet long at low tide.  When you get a very high tide, the river’s down to 120 feet.  And yet, it’s wider than some rivers in Arizona, and certainly has more water in it.

That water does fascinating things there on the beach.

Bouncy Water

It moves along pretty quickly, for all there’s not much slope.  As it plays around with the beach sand, it seems to create its own little jumps, which it then leaps joyously over.  The water gets so excited in places it froths:

Foamy!

You can see river gravel in its bed:

River Rocks on an Ocean Beach

 Which the ocean waves sometimes filch, and then run up the beach:

Wave-Bothered Gravel

You can sit and watch the river erode a bank into the beach:

Erosion in an Instant

And see some very entertaining erosional forms:

Making Tracks

This is a river that seems to live life from concentrate.  It may be the shortest river in the world, but it’s certainly not the dullest.

So where the hell is this very short river coming from, you might wonder.  There’s this lake, you see, formed in uplifted marine sediments about 14,000 years ago.

Devil’s Lake

It’s 680 acres, a third of a mile wide, three miles long, and (drumroll, please) all of 21 feet deep.  But it nestles between the Coast Range foothills and the coast like the liquid equivalent of a Montana sapphire.

Sapphires and Emeralds

Its watershed covers all of 12.1 square miles.  And its outlet is none other than the D River.  Neat!

These images were taken at Regatta Park, where the bastards were getting ready to have a bloody regatta, which meant I had to take my shots quick and get out.  No time to linger.  But that gave me time to find a truly fine exposure of the Pleistocene dune and beach sands on NE Devil’s Lake Road:

Layer Sandcake

Someday, if nothing untoward happens to it like, oh, say, getting completely eroded away, this old beach deposit may end up becoming sandstone, and some future geologist will be cooing over its bedding:

Streaks and Stripes

And because I can’t resist, here’s just one more:

I Think the Biology Is Jealous

With that, it was time to return to the hotel, where my intrepid companion was probably awake and wondering WTF I was out doing.  We’d soon be on our way to hook up with Suzanne in Netarts Bay on our way to Cape Meares, but as you’ll soon see, we got waylaid by Cape Kiwanda and one of the most fascinating sandstone headlands on the entire Oregon coast.

As ye olde tomes of indispensable reference failed me for this area, I present instead ye olde links:

Oregon Coast.org: About Lincoln City – source of some interesting tidbits on statues and short rivers.

The Devil’s Lake Plan, Devil’s Lake Water Improvement District (.pdf)

Shyuer-Ming Shih and Paul D. Komar: Sediments, Beach Morphology and Sea Cliff Erosion within an Oregon Coast Littoral Cell, Journal of Coastal Research (Winter 1994).  Hooray for informative abstracts!


Paul D. Komar: Ocean processes and hazards along the Oregon coastOregon Geology, Volume 54, Number 1, January 1992 (.pdf).  The paper that allowed me to sound like I’d known this stuff all along!

Ernest H. Lund: Rock Units and Coastal Landforms Between Newport and Lincoln City, Oregon. The Ore Bin, Vol. 36, No. 5 May 1974 (.pdf).  Another paper that allowed me to sound like I’m savvy. 


George R. Priest and Jonathan C. Allan: Evaluation of Coastal Erosion Hazard Zones Along Dune and Bluff Backed Shorelines in Lincoln County, Oregon: Cascade Head to Seal Rock.  State of Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries OFR O-04-09 (.pdf).  No, I did not read all 93 pages!

Oregon Geology Parte the Fifth: Land o' Lincoln (City)

Some Thoughts on Subduction, Science, and Denialists

What I was supposed to be doing today: cleaning house, working on research.

What I did: got sucked into a series of posts having fun at the expense of Expanding Earthers, who are just as pathetic as IDiots.

It all started with this tweet, which led to me reading three posts on subduction and the Cascadia subduction zone by Brian Romans, including comments.  The comments taught me that Expanding Earthers like to engage in all the usual IDiocy, namely quote mining, misinterpreting science, refusing to answer direct questions, refusing to provide any actual evidence and/or explain how their inane ideas fit the data, and when backed into a corner, move the goalposts, frantically start making shit up and/or resort to personal attacks before running away in a snit.  And let’s not forget the ALL CAPS arguments.  For some reason, these people think ALL CAPS makes their contentions IRREFUTABLE.  Pathetic.

From there, I went on to a post that demolishes Expanding Earther dumbfuckery with one word: gravity

Now.  I’d like to make some observations for any passing Expanding Earthers:

1.  If you want to overturn existing scientific paradigms, you must present the data and evidence to do so.  No, I’m sorry – you’re not going to understand that.  Let me try to put it in a format you can understand:

If you want scientists to take your Expanding Earth idea seriously, YOU must PRESENT DATA AND EVIDENCE in PEER-REVIEWED PUBLICATIONS.  It is YOUR JOB to PROVIDE EVIDENCE, because you are trying to overturn a body of scientific work that has already proven itself over and over and over and over and over again. 

Let’s pretend for a moment that this is a jello wrestling match.  The current theory of plate tectonics has so much evidence and so much data backing it that, if evidence and data were jello, scientists would be able to bury you to a depth of roughly ten billion feet with it.  You, on the other hand, are holding an empty jello packet and trying to say you won.  It’s just sad.

2.  For all those who like to play maverick and pretend there is some huge conspiracy preventing your EE bullshit from being taken seriously, you might want to consider how quickly scientists accepted plate tectonics when other scientists presented evidence proving it and supplied a mechanism showing how it would be possible. 

In fact, the plate tectonics revolution seems to be one of the most beautiful examples of how science works: first came the germ of an idea (continental drift), which wasn’t accepted until a lot of hard work got done.  Scientists went out and did science.  Evidence piled up.  The idea got tweaked and modified into a theory (plate tectonics).  The theory turned out to explain a whole lot of disparate data that couldn’t be explained before.  The underlying mechanism was found.  And before you knew it, viva la revolucion! 

All of this happened because the early plate tectonics folks actually went out and did science.  They didn’t sit around sniveling that scientists wouldn’t listen to them.  They didn’t mine some quotes and call it a day.  They worked their asses off, knowing their ideas would live or die based on their results, that they had to present the evidence, that they had to do the science, that they might be wrong and had to be damned sure they were right before they could expect respect. 

3.  Ask yourself what’s more likely: that the entire scientific establishment, from chemists to physicists to geologists to biologists to every other form of –ist, together with all of their journals, conferences, organizations, and so forth, are conspiring to conceal “the truth” you think is out there, or that you’re a deluded nitwit?  Apply Occam’s Razor.  And if you slice it on the “Everybody’s conspiring!” side, please pin a badge to your chest that says “Certified Crank” so the rest of us don’t have to waste our time with you.

Now if you’ll excuse me, I must get on with finding other ways to entertain myself, such as wondering if there are any Shrinking Earthers out there so that we can set up a cage match between them and the Expanders.  No jello wrestling, alas, as neither of them have got any jello.  Still, it’d be quite the sight to see.

Some Thoughts on Subduction, Science, and Denialists

So You Know Exactly How God Did It, Then?

You know, sometimes it seems like USA has come to stand for “United States of Appalling Ignorance.”  A lot of people in this country need to read an improving book.  And I’m not talking about the Bible.  That one only seems to improve people’s ability to be smug about their appalling ignorance.


MTHellfire found this bit of outstanding fuckwittery spouted by Bill O’Reilly and took him to the woodshed over it (h/t):

“Tide goes in and tide goes out…you can’t explain that.” Bill O’Reilly recently told Dave Silverman of American Atheists, during a recent airing on Fox News as they debated the integrity of religion.

After her head hit her desk, she went on to advise that, yes, actually, Billo, we can explain how the tide goes in and out.  I’d just like to add that Billo needs to avail himself of a book I recently read, Beyond the Moon.  We are so able to explain tides that entire pop sci books can be written on the subject.

MTHellfire went on to quote, in its full misspelled glory, a screed she’d been subjected to on Facebook, wherein the correspondent (and I use this term loosely) advised that the reason people don’t trust scientists is that they can’t explain where the first speck of dirt came from, but they can tell you how life was created.

Wrong wrong wrong, and not just because the original had enough grammatical errors to make an English teacher contemplate a home lobotomy in an effort to escape the pain.  Scientists can explain how life evolved.  They’re not yet sure how it originated, but they’ve got some promising ideas.  They’re pretty certain it did not include a large bearded deity poofing the whole thing into existence.

As far as the speck of dirt goes, any decent book on cosmology can clue you in.  Dirt is formed of elements.  Elements are forged in stars.  And so on, all the way back to the Big Bang.  So yes, Facebook babbler, scientists can explain where the first speck of dirt came from.  At length, and with equations, if you like.

But it’s not like the “God did it” crowd is likely to listen to the evidence.  If they do, their eyes will all too likely glaze over, and they will take this as a sign: they cannot understand it, therefore scientists don’t really understand it, ergo Jesus!  So let me just turn this around a bit.  I like turning tables.  It adds interest to a room.

Here’s my reply to the “Scientists can’t explain every single detail exactly, so God, so there!” crowd:

Do you know every last detail of how, precisely, God created the universe?  I mean, precisely how he spoke the whole thing into existence?  The complete and excruciating details of how, exactly, God did it, from the first photon to the last squidgy bit on Eve?

No?

Deary me.  Guess I’ll have to just stick with science, then.

So You Know Exactly How God Did It, Then?

Oregon Geology Parte the Fourth: Hug Yer Geology South

We’ve had an eventful first day in Oregon so far.  We saw the mouth of the mighty Columbia River at Astoria; watched the Columbia River Basalts plunge into the sea at Ecola State Park; and done a bit of desultory spelunking at the north side of Hug Point.  The sun’s getting ready to sink into the sea past shattered sea stacks of brecciated basalt.

Grande Ronde Silhouette

And if we don’t get our arses round Austin Point and back before high tide, we’re going to be hugging something other than geology soon.  It’s a mad scramble through a tangle of biology up to Highway 101 if you get stranded on the beach.  So let’s get a move on.

The character of the place changes a bit down here.  And it’s a good place to talk about basalt.

First off, if one’s just taking a casual look round, it’s easy to be deceived.  What with all these dikes, stringers, sills, and so forth, it’s easy to think that these basalts are natives.  In fact, for a while, that’s just what geologists thought.  The source didn’t seem like it could be too far from here.  After all, the way the Columbia River Basalts insinuated themselves into the local strata, it looked just like they’d arrived from below.

However, that’s not what gravity and chemistry tells us.

A Finger o’ Basalt

Check this dude out.  If he were a local, he’d be rooted pretty far down, thousands of feet in fact.  But gravity studies revealed that all that lovely, solid basalt stops just a few hundred feet beneath the surface.  Weird, inexplicable – until you look east, and realize there’s a whole big plateau of this stuff covering appreciable parts of Oregon and Washington.  But most of the basalt flows we’re used to travel only so far and then peter out: a mile, a dozen, sometimes a hundred.  But nearly half a thousand?  Read some of the old scientific papers on this area, and you’ll see that geologists struggled with the idea.

But then came chemistry.  And chemical analysis said, “Yup, that’s sure Columbia River Basalt, that is.  Eye-din-tee-cull.”  It boggles the mind – we’ve had zero experience with state-spanning flows of flood basalts in recent history.  If I’m remembering rightly, humans in historical time never have witnessed such a thing.  But it happened here.

Down here to the south, the Grande Ronde looms more.  And it’s a mass of fractures and fragments, welded together.

Scarface

Make sure at some point to stand shoulder-to-shoulder with the point and look out to sea.  It’s a wild and wonderful view.

Rampart

Clamber over the riot of rocks, basalt rising up on both sides of you.  Once you’re through the gap between head and stack, you’ll suddenly emerge from igneous to sedimentary again.

Dipping Down

If you’re looking at those layers and thinking, “Hmm, tilty,” you’re not wrong – they’ve got a pronounced dip.  Why this is, I have not yet discovered, but I imagine it has quite a bit to do with hanging about on the edge of a subduction zone.

Sandstone Slope

Notice the basalt stack right to the right of it, there?  That’s remnants of a big dike of Grande Ronde basalt that sheared off the Astoria Formation, and now protects it from the worst of the waves.

Down near the tide line, when you can find bits that aren’t all covered in crunchy-coated biology, you can see just how smooth and slick basalt can become when polished by sand-laden waves.

Scoured Basalt

The spaces between the sea stacks and the headland form channels, and so we end up with these lovely smooth bits that look like they’ve been scoured out by a river.  See how fractured and fragmented it is, even polished?  When the basalt hit the coast and plunged into the cold Pacific waters, it cooled rapidly enough to shatter.  In places, it actually boiled the water, and you can see red oxidized basalt where that happened.

Things look rather different where the water’s been at the sandstone.

Carven

Looks like the sea’s trying to tunnel through here, helped by pebbles.

I want to turn your attention now to the head, where you can see basalt and sediments getting really intimate.

Entwined

See how the basalt threads its way through the sandstone, there?  When it reached the coast, it sank into the mud and sand, butted in between layers, and wove itself into any space it could find or make.  In places, it incorporated the sediments into itself.  Told you this is XXX geology.

Jaunty Basalt Cap

If the Columbia River Basalt’s Grande Ronde formation hadn’t made it out to the coast, it’s quite possible, even probable, we wouldn’t be seeing these lovely cliffs.  We certainly wouldn’t have the imposing heads and monolithic sea stacks.  Sandstones and mudstones aren’t as inclined to hold up against wave action, as we’ll see when we get to Parte the Fifth.

In places, the intruding Grande Ronde squirted up through the sediments.  Remnants still stand watch, tall and imposing.

Sentinel

Get closer to one of them.  Let’s choose the one that’s tilting like a charming drunk.

Leaning Tower

Notice how chunky it is, some of it blocky and some more brecciated.  This basalt didn’t have a long, quiet cool-down.  If you’ve ever wondered why sea stacks look so rough, now you know it isn’t just the relentless pounding of the waves – it’s the explosive action of rapid quenching.

Come closer still.

Jumbly-Wumbly

Check that out.  Chips, cracks, and even some rough conchoidal fractures off to the left, there.  This is some seriously broken rock.  It makes it a lot of fun to explore.  Unfortunately, before we could get really immersed in it, we were getting immersed in something else.  Stupid high tide.

Gazing North

One last, long, lingering look; one last fond pat for the rocks; one final moment to contemplate the power of good Mother Earth to create and destroy; and then it’s off to the Land o’ Lincoln (City), where we’ll meet the world’s shortest river.

Ye olde indispensable volumes of reference as the author was trying to make sense of it all:

Fires, Faults and Floods – one of the best roadside guides to the Columbia River Basin evah.

In Search of Ancient Oregon – simply the most beautiful book written about Oregon’s natural history.
Hiking Oregon’s Geology – chock full o’ adventurous goodness sure to help you get your rocks on.

Northwest Exposures – tying the whole shebang together in one easy-to-follow narrative.

Cataclysms on the Columbia – the book that truly helped me comprehend the incomprehensible.

The Restless Northwest – short, sweet, and yet comprehensive guide to Northwest geological shenanigans.

Roadside Geology of Oregon and Roadside Geology of Washington – indispensable references and inspirations.

Glacial Lake Missoula and its Humongous Floods – not only an informative guide to the discovery and history of the Floods, but an apt title, too!
Oregon Geology Parte the Fourth: Hug Yer Geology South

Building a Better World: Ice Caves

Welcome to the first installment in what promises to be a very nearly endless series.  I’ll be bringing you the fruits of my research as I build Xtalea from the core up.  We’ll be exploring everything from geology to biology to all sorts of interesting tidbits that come up.

Before we get to ice caves, I suppose we should break some ice.  Those of you who’ve become Wise Readers and follow my writing blog already have a general idea of what I’m up to, but the rest of you all are probably a bit lost.  For two decades now (no, that is not an exaggeration or typo), I’ve been working on a series of SF novels that span many worlds and thousands of years of time.  We begin sixteen thousand years ago, on Xtalea, which is the world I’m building now.  And since the world itself will end up being a major theme throughout the series, it’s got to be done right.  The world itself is something of a character.

It will be an Earth-like planet, so I can take several cues from our very own world.  This is fortunate.  It makes the research a lot easier.  PZ’s going to hate it, because it’s essential to the ultimate plot-line for it to be quite similar to Earth.  But aside from tetchy biologists who want their aliens more alien, everyone else should be relatively satisfied, and that’s all that ultimately matters.

Right, then.  We should all be on the same page, or at least in the same book.  So let’s start building a world, shall we?  Get your spelunking gear on and descend.  There will be much science and lovely photos!

Before I ever really knew anything about Xtalea, I knew there would be ice caves.  They came up in a short story I wrote by way of figuring out some of my main characters.  One is remembering the ice caves where young soraani slept.  (As to why young soraani slept in extremely cold caves, you’ll just have to sign up to be a Wise Reader to find out.  Email me at dhunterauthor at yahoo dot com if you haven’t already.)

This was approaching a decade ago, and they’ve stuck in my mind since, in a vague sort of way.  As more pieces came together, I got more of a sense of them: they were somewhere beneath the main Academy buildings at Aa’radaan.  Aa’radaan was set in a valley strongly reminiscent of something you’d find in the Alps.  But they were always just a gleam in the darkness, although I knew they’d become an essential piece.

I knew nothing about ice caves.  I just knew these were caves with ice in.  Sum total of experience I’d ever had with ice caves in my life: a lava tube in Flagstaff, Arizona, which was nothing like what I was envisioning for Aa’raadan.  Lava tubes these weren’t, but what were they?

A few weeks ago, I decided it was time to find out.  I engaged in a bit of Google-fu, and found out that it’s bloody damned hard to find anything useful on ice caves written for the layperson.  It’s mostly tacky tourist stuff.  One Wikipedia article that didn’t take me far enough.  Plenty of images that meshed with what I’d been envisioning, though, which told me that what I needed for my world had analogues on Earth, and that meant there had to be information out there somewhere.  I picked a cave to focus on: the Eisriesenwelt.



Perfect!  And, miracle of miracles, one of the sites I found wasn’t strictly tacky tourist.  In fact, it’s one of the only sites for a popular tourist destination I’ve ever found that actually has a link to really solid scientific information, in-depth stuff that wasn’t afraid to use large words.  It’s just unfortunate those words were all  German when I clicked for the .pdf.  And that inspired me to dip my toes into actual scientific papers on Google Scholar.

Did you know there’s lots that are freely available?  I didn’t, until I realized if there’s a link to the .pdf to the side of the search results, ordinary folk like me can read the original science without having to cough up substantial cash to a journal. This. Is.  Wonderful.

I spent an instructive few nights poring over the scientific literature, and came out with a treasure trove of information that will be essential for building a better Xtalea.

I had a few specific questions to answer starting out: were the kind of caves I envisioned plausible for the kind of terrain and climate Aa’radaan is in?  How are they formed?  Why do they have ice in them?  What sort of rock do they tend to form in?  And can they be as large as what I’d need them to be?  (Some of you might be thinking: Dana, you’re writing speculative fiction.  You can have things any way you want.  But that’s not strictly true, and besides, reality is one hell of a springboard for imagination.  So yes, these sorts of questions have to be asked, and yes, I’m willing to spend several nights reading peer-reviewed papers to answer them.)

We’d answered the first question when we stumbled upon Eisriesenwelt.  Absolutely, these kinds of caves can be found in that sort of valley.  Excellent.  Ice caves are real.  That will add some reality to the fantasy.

It helps to define what we’re talking about when we discuss “ice caves.”  I don’t mean the kinds of caves that form in glaciers and are formed completely of ice.  Those are more properly termed “glacier caves.”  Here’s a great definition: “‘Ice caves’ are rock-hosted caves containing perennial ice or snow, or both”  (Luetscher and Jeannin 2004 .pdf).  In other words, they’re like the caves we’re all used to, only they’ve got constant ice in.

Why have they got ice in?

This is where it gets interesting.  There’s different sorts, you see.  And you don’t even need them to be in a super-cold region: they can form just fine in temperate regions where the mean annual temperature isn’t even below freezing.  We’ll see why in a moment.

From Luetscher and Jeannin 2004

Let’s talk about types.  First, there’s the static ice cave, where warm summer air doesn’t get much of a look-in.  Remember the basics about how air moves: warm air rises, cold air sinks.  So if you’ve got a cave that slopes downward, and its opening is at the top, all that lovely cold winter air sinks right down into the cave and stays put.  In the winter time, when the outside temperatures are colder and the outside air thus denser, you get yourself a fresh infusion of freezing cold air.  In the summertime, the less dense warm air hasn’t got a chance to oust all the cold air that’s sunk down to the bottom.  And since the bedrock makes good insulation, there’s not much chance all that cold air lurking down below is going to heat up.  Voila, icy cold cave, in which you can enjoy freezing temperatures at the height of summer.  In fact, there’s a delightful description of this in Ice-caves of France and Switzerland by George Forrest Browne

We placed one of Casella’s thermometers on a piece of wood on one of the wet stones, clear of the ice, and it soon fell to 34°. Probably the temperature had been somewhat raised by the continued presence of three human beings and two lighted candles in the small cavern; and, at any rate, the cold of two degrees above freezing was something very real on a hot summer’s day, and told considerably upon my sisters, so that we were compelled to beat a retreat,- not quite in time, for one of our party could not effect a thaw, even by stamping about violently in the full afternoon sun.

Quite cold!

From Luetscher and Jeannin 2004

Our second sort of ice cave is a dynamic one.  It’s got more than one entrance.  The key is relative elevation: one entrance has got to be higher than the other.  This allows all that nice air with its different densities and pressures to get a move on.  Air flow follows the seasons.  In the winter, cold air is drawn in through the lower entrance; water there finds itself frozen, and the warm air that swoops down in summer isn’t strong enough to melt it again.  These caves have not one, but two, thermal anomalies: one at the lower bit where it’s colder than you’d expect, and one at the upper bit where it’s warmer.

From Luetscher and Jeannin 2004

The third type of cave is called a “statodynamic” ice cave, and if you’ve been paying attention to terms, you can probably figure out it’s got features of both static and dynamic caves.  You get a bit of the “chimney-effect” seen in dynamic caves, where air can get a move-on, but it’s also got a static area where air stagnates. 

The ice in ice caves comes mostly from snow that, like snow on a glacier, recrystallizes into ice, or from water that dripped, flowed or otherwise found a way inside and froze.  Hoar frost is also a
contributor.  If the cave is near a glacier, you might also see the glacier ice coming in for a visit.

Hoar Frost in an ice cave

Now, here’s a little detail that will blow your mind: one place you’re not likely to find an ice cave is in a place with permanent permafrost.  That’s right.  If the ground’s always frozen and has been for some time, there’s just not enough free water wandering around to form a decent ice cave.  Oh, it’s cold in there, and you might get yourself some nice hoar frost, but as far as those lovely sheets and columns and streams of ice, you can fuggedaboutit.  Is that, or is that not, an awesome little factoid?  Dazzle your friends and win bets in bars with it.

There are several conditions other than the elevation of entrances and chimney effects that influence ice in caves: mean annual temperature is one (you’re not likely to find ice caves in areas with no winter), which slope the cave entrance is on (south-facing is, after all, warmer), even tree cover (Citterio et al 2004).  So there’s a lot that goes in to forming an ice cave, and that puts constraints on where I can site the buggers on Xtalea.  You’re not likely to find one in the Siaan, for instance, which is closer to the tropics and is one of those regions that believes snow happens to other people.  Might be able to sneak one into the highest mountains there, but if I put one close to the coast, geologically-savvy readers will know I’m completely full of shit, and that will rather kill the semblance of reality, so we shall just avoid that.

Right.  So there we are: we have an idea of what ice caves are.  Not a lot of info on the type of rocks yet, although most of what I’ve seen is limestone.  As I dig deeper into the geology of Aa’radaan, I can determine what we’re dealing with.  Limestone?  Possibly marble?  I’ve got a whole new big book on caves I’m about to read that will help me determine what the bedrock shall be.  And now I know roughly where those caves will be located, and where their entrances must be, which means they may not be beneath the Academy proper after all.  I also have new decisions to make: static, dynamic, or statodynamic?  Only more treks through Google images will answer that, but so far, it seems the caves that most closely match my mind’s eye are the dynamic ones.  We have Eisriesenwelt, of course.  There are also a few more that provide great inspiration.  There’s Demanovska in Slovakia:

Demanovska Cave of Liberty

In various parts of the cave, you can see enormous ice formations, pools of water, and typical cave formations – absolutely exquisite.

Glacière de Monlési in Switzerland:

Glacière de Monlési

“Glacière” is actually the proper term for an ice cave, but it hasn’t caught on all that well in English, probably because everybody thinks it means “glacier,” which it doesn’t…  Regardless, it’s an absolutely gorgeous cave.

We’ll continue this discussion later, as I delve further into the world of ice caves.  We haven’t even gotten to the cryogenic carbonates yet.  Caves have ice formations just as they have stone formations.  And there’s doubtless much more to explore.

References: 
Marc Luetscher and Pierre-Yves Jeannin, “A process-based classification of alpine caves.”  Theoretical and Applied Karstology, 17 (2004), pp. 5-10

Luetscher, M., B. Lismonde, and P.-Y. Jeannin (2008), Heat exchanges in the heterothermic zone of a karst system: Monlesi cave, Swiss Jura Mountains.” J. Geophys. Res., 113, F02025, doi:10.1029/2007JF000892
Building a Better World: Ice Caves

Oregon Geology Parte the Third: Hug Yer Geology North

Seems like only last year I was promising you I’d get to the next installment of Oregon Geology anydaynow.  Heh heh heh whoops.  Well, better late than never, right?

For those of you just joining or wanting to refresh yourselves on the series to date, Parte the First ’tis here and Parte the Second ’tis there.  When we left off, we’d just watched the Columbia River flood basalts hit the ocean, and things had got a bit steamy.  Were this metaphor to be extended, Hug Point would have to be rated as XXX geology.  Here, basalts and sediments got really intimate.

Hug Point, viewed from Austin Point

There’s something for everyone here.  You want sedimentary rocks?  Gots ’em.  Basalts?  Yup.  Fault?  Even so!  Hydrology, check.  Coastal wave processes, oh check.  And if you’re with non-geo types, you can distract them with the pretty scenery, the nice historical wagon road to the north, and the tide pools, while you go get your rocks on.

I can’t do this place the justice it deserves.  It’s so rich geologically that an amateur like myself can merely stutter over some of its more outstanding features.  But I’ve got a ton of pretty pictures – so many, in fact, we’re going to have to split proceedings into a North Hug and a South Hug.  So come feast your eyes and feed your soul.

Two things drew me to Hug Point: the cave and the waterfall.  We’ll begin with the cave, since it’s right there to your right the instant you step off the stairs.

The Completely Awesome Hug Point Cave

This is one of the greatest wave-carved caves on the face of the earth, because it’s got a lot going on.  Let’s paint the broad outlines a bit.  The pale rocks are the sedimentary sandstones, mudstones, and conglomerate of the Astoria Formation.  The darker stuff is Grande Ronde basalt, which blundered into the Astoria on its mad dash to the sea around 15.6 million years ago.  And I do mean in to – dikes, sills, and breccia abound, basalt and sediments doing a mad little dance as they suddenly found themselves trying to occupy the same space.

Sediment vs. Basalt – Fight!

The cave shows a wonderful example of a basalt dike (or sill, I’ve seen it described both ways in my sources) intruding the Astoria Formation.  Here, it looks like the basalt squeezed its way in and made itself right at home.  Out in the weather, it’s that interesting reddish brown color.  Inside, it forms part of the roof of the cave, glistening black against the pale gold sandstone.

Basalt and Sedimentary Goodness

We’ll just have another view into the cave, then.  It’s too yummy not to:

Delicious Geologic Goodness

And yes, the cave’s big enough to stand up in.  You’d think it’s too small to get lost in, but there are ways of getting lost other than the geographic ones.  My intrepid companion very nearly didn’t manage to extract me.  There’s all too much to look at here, from the rocks stained by iron oxides:

Nature Red in Tooth and Rock

To the utterly intriguing contact between basalt and sandstone:

Contact Fascination

To the crazily contorted sediments:

Folded, Spindled and Mutilated

To the breccia:

All Broken Up

And the wave-plucked conglomerates:

Holy Conglomerate, Batman!

The back shoulder of the cave alone tells a long story:

Tilted Sediments and Conglomerate and Breccia, oh my!

The cave itself is like a geologic version of War and Peace.  If I was a little more geologically literate, I’d probably have been in there reading it until the tide came in and drowned me.  And then, just when you think you’re gonna make it round the headland, bam!  Another cave:

Ooo, Caves!

This one is a slot rather than a great gouge, but it’s awesome and it’s fun to nose into.

Rather Like a Baby Slot Canyon

Once you finally extract yourself from caves, you’re whacked in the eyeballs by some really incredible headlands:

Thar Be Hug Point!

If you have not yet divested yourself of heretics not fascinated by geology, now is the time to aim them north and babble about wagon trails that could only be traversed at low tide, and oh-did-I-mention-tide-pools-go-play-with-a-starfish-now-there’s-a-good-lad.  That should keep them occupied long enough for you to salivate in peace.

You’ll also notice another cave in the distance.  You will be tempted by it.  I assure you that, should you have had your fill of spelunking for the day, other things are going to drive that cave right out of your head.  For instance…

Mmm, Basalt!

…this enormous basalt shoulder now looming to your left.  Let us pause to admire this sill.

Shiny!

Here, it seems the Grande Ronde tried its damnedest to form respectable columns.  This was not an easy matter.  You know what happens to hot things when they hit cold things, and the basalt flows, still hot even after a four-hundred mile journey, had just come smack up against cool mud and cold seawater.  Had you been here, the place probably would’ve been covered in great gouts of steam.  Of course, had you been here, it’s very possible you would have gotten un-gently sauteed by hot lava, so it’s probably best you weren’t.

So, no slow and stately cooling here for the most part, and columns aren’t well-defined like they are further east where the flows could really pile up and take their time cooling down, but here we see some columnar ambitions.  And it’s so black and shiny!  Water seeps down the cliff face, making everything positively gleam.

If you stand still here, nose to rock, lovingly tracing out patterns of cracks and joints, you’ll notice you’re hearing a roar.  This is not the surf.

Fall Creek Falls

Turn around, and you shall see one of the prettiest little waterfalls in the known universe, hurtling joyfully along a NE-SW trending fault line.  Fall Creek leaps over t
he lip of Astoria Formation sandstone and goes pelting for the ocean.  You, on the other hand, probably will not.  If you’ve got any aesthetic sense at all, you’ll go sit yourself down beside the falls, right where the rush and roar of water drowns out other beachgoers’ voices, and enjoy the views.

Serenity Among the Sediments
Steams Flowing Out to Sea

As you relax there in the sun, snuggled up against warm sandstone, contemplating wave, wind and water, don’t forget to make friends with the rocks.  The sandstone’s really pretty here, full of sparkly flakes of (I’m nearly positive) mica.

Sparkly

Eventually, you might be able to tear yourself away and scramble up beside the falls for a good look at the fault.

Fault Line

Plenty of nice rock to poke around up there, including one that may still be in an amusing shape when you visit.

I Dub Thee Pecker Pinnacle

Random humans for scale.

The rocks up here form walls and ramparts – it’s rather like scrambling around in a natural-born castle.

Battlement Boulders

It feels like a very different world from the rough, tough basalts.  These rocks are smoother, rounded, but feel like sandpaper when you stroke them.  The basalt had actually been quite smooth and cool.  And yes, I do indeed spend my vacations petting rocks.  You of all people should understand.

Before you head back down, don’t forget to amuse yourself by gazing over the lip of the falls.

Falling off the Edge of the World – Whee!

Oh, to be a drop of water just now!

It’s about this time that you reluctantly wrest your eyes from the rocks and look up to see what the sun’s up to.  It’s hard to explore geology in the dark, after all.  And you see this great big blue thingy crashing into the rocks.

Oshit, That’s Right – There’s an Ocean…

It’s about that time you realize that the tide will be coming in soon, and you’ve got a whole south sector still needing exploring.  So, with reluctance, you tear yourself away from the great and glorious north, and begin your trek down the beach.  Which we will have to save for next time, because we’re already pushing it on pictures here.

You can see why, though, can’t you?  Told you this place was outstanding.  They may have named it Hug Point because wagoneers had to “hug” the cliffs on their travels, but a geologist might have named it that, too.  You want to hug it and squeeze it and pet it and love it and take it home with you.

Ye olde indispensable volumes of reference as the author was trying to make sense of it all:

Fires, Faults and Floods – one of the best roadside guides to the Columbia River Basin evah.

In Search of Ancient Oregon – simply the most beautiful book written about Oregon’s natural history.
Hiking Oregon’s Geology – chock full o’ adventurous goodness sure to help you get your rocks on.

Northwest Exposures – tying the whole shebang together in one easy-to-follow narrative.

Cataclysms on the Columbia – the book that truly helped me comprehend the incomprehensible.

The Restless Northwest – short, sweet, and yet comprehensive guide to Northwest geological shenanigans.

Roadside Geology of Oregon and Roadside Geology of Washington – indispensable references and inspirations.

Glacial Lake Missoula and its Humongous Floods – not only an informative guide to the discovery and history of the Floods, but an apt title, too!
Oregon Geology Parte the Third: Hug Yer Geology North

How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Scientific Literature

Things have changed rather drastically.  As recently as six months ago, I couldn’t have read a scientific paper to save my life.  Oh, I grant you, I’d tried a few times, but found myself bogged down and stymied by incomprehensible language.  So I usually gave them a miss.

Instead, I read the science blogs, which are for the most part written in layperson-friendly language.  Popular science books, ditto.  Ventured into some heavier stuff written for a non-lay audience and found it heavy going, but waded on through, aside from a few books I had to put aside because I Just Wasn’t Getting It.

Then, a few months ago, I started wanting to read the papers referred to in various and sundry.  Problem being, far too many of them are behind a pay wall, and I am far from rich.  Grumble.  I didn’t really notice my attitude shifting, but it was.

And then, last month, as I developed a sudden need to research ice caves, I turned in desperation to Google Scholar.  Some freely-available .pdfs turned up in my searches, and those, combined with a dearth of suitably-detailed stuff written in regular people language drove me to actually read a couple of scientific papers, and I discovered I liked them.  I enjoyed reading them.  I understood at least the gist of what they said: the language didn’t seem incomprehensible, the big words didn’t frighten me, and I’d absorbed enough of the terms and concepts through other reading that even the denser passages weren’t that difficult to read.  I know I’m still missing at least 50% of what those papers are trying to say, but I’m getting enough of the context that I can understand what they’re getting at.  If a term throws me, a quick Google search resolves the confusion.  The math is still completely beyond my ken, but surprisingly many papers on geology have little to no math featured.  So that’s all right, then.

I’ve been watching my own reading in fascination.  Sometimes, I’ll stop and think, “Holy shit, I’d have had no idea what that meant last year.”  But somewhere along the way, I learned how to read science.  I picked up enough Greek and Latin that I can loosely translate very large, unfamiliar terms with relative ease.  I mean, take this phrase: “cryogenic carbonate precipitates.”  Sounds huge and scary.  But all it really means is carbonate rocks like limestone deposited in a cold environment.  Basically, if you know how things like stalagmites form in caves (deposited by water carrying dissolved calcium carbonate), know that carbonate refers to stuff that contains carbon and oxygen (like limestone), and that cryo means cold, you’ve got it made.  Even “heterothermic” held no terrors.  Hetero – mixed.  Thermic – temperature.  Mixed-temperature.  Easy-peasy!  I’ve got the gist of it justlikethat!  Sure, it’s not 100% precise, but at this point, it doesn’t have to be.

And that ability to translate on the fly didn’t come from studying ancient languages, but simply from reading a lot of books and blogs about science, where the authors carefully defined terms when they couldn’t use plain English, and thus I started seeing patterns in what certain words mean and how they’re used.  I didn’t even know I was learning that sort of thing!  It just happened, and wasn’t obvious until the day I needed it.

You science bloggers and popular science book writers, you may not quite realize what you’re doing.  You’re making it possible for former English-History majors like myself, us college dropouts, us regular old Joes and Janes with an interest in science but absolutely no formal training, to dip into the scientific literature and read it without undue strain.  It’s challenging, absolutely – but thanks to those writing for a popular audience, it’s not an insurmountable challenge anymore.  Give me another year or two hanging about your blogs and reading your books, and it’s quite likely I’ll be a more confident judge of quality, as well – I’ll begin to understand statistical methods better, I’ll have a better sense of what makes the difference between solid and shoddy science, and it’s just possible that even math will hold no terrors.  It’s because you’ve embedded these tough concepts in a matrix of clear prose.  And you’ve thus given me the keys to a whole new kingdom.  I don’t have to rely on translators so much any more.  It’s wondrous is what it is.  So, a thousand times: thank you.

Now, if you’ll excuse me, there’s a whole ocean of science papers I’ve yet to dabble my toes in.

How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Scientific Literature