Right. The fossil plant won by a landslide. Batten down your hats, my darlings, because this one is truly bizarre.
I’m going to show you it. But I’m not going to tell you what it is just yet. It’s a bit of a riddle, and I’d like to give you all a chance to figure it out. Ready? Synapses firing, neurons engaged and all that? Then let us begin.
I am black as the moonless night, but I once reached for the light of day.
Touch me, and I am soft enough to leave powdery pieces of myself behind.
Yet I am hard enough to scratch steel.

Mystery fossil III. Note the rust spots on the hammer just above the fossil, and the fact there is no scratch beneath them.
What am I?






20 comments
Skip to comment form ↓
cope
July 12, 2012 at 3:01 am (UTC -7) Link to this comment
You are: 1) harder than 6 on Moh’s scale, but 2) powdery because of the left-over matrix from which you came and, 3) have the appearance of petrified wood or bone.
I’m gonna go with petrified wood.
cope
July 12, 2012 at 3:16 am (UTC -7) Link to this comment
Addendum: siliceous petrified wood.
rq
July 12, 2012 at 3:34 am (UTC -7) Link to this comment
Carbonized wood fossil. Like really, really old charcoal. Or something. I’m having the gut feeling that carbon is really important here.
Barbara Noon
July 12, 2012 at 3:43 am (UTC -7) Link to this comment
I’m not going to leave a guess, because I read what everyone else put, and my guess was not like theirs and would make me look stupid. Just letting you know a lot of us have no idea!
zoebrain
July 12, 2012 at 5:23 am (UTC -7) Link to this comment
Carbonised wood, the shininess on the steel from a layer of graphite rather than a scratch.
I use graphite pencils to get a metallic effect when making 1/144 models of WWI aircraft.
Gregory in Seattle
July 12, 2012 at 6:25 am (UTC -7) Link to this comment
I want to say anthracite, but I don’t think that would be hard enough to scratch iron oxide residue. Anyway, that isn’t really a fossil. Jet, perhaps?
Katherine
July 12, 2012 at 7:42 am (UTC -7) Link to this comment
Could be graphene
Lockwood
July 12, 2012 at 10:45 am (UTC -7) Link to this comment
Just to clarify, it really *does* gouge into steel quite nicely. It’s very hard stuff, but at the same time, soft enough to rub off on your hands. Dana, did you (I hope) get some photos of the outcrop? I was so tired, I didn’t think to.
Trebuchet
July 12, 2012 at 11:41 am (UTC -7) Link to this comment
Hmmm. It certainly looks like the picture of jet in Wikipedia, but according to the article jet has a Mohs hardess of only 2.5 to 4. I wouldn’t expect anthracite to be even that hard. Does it burn at all?
By the way: Thanks to this post I know at least know what jet is! Previously I just knew it was something black.
Lockwood
July 12, 2012 at 11:46 am (UTC -7) Link to this comment
It doesn’t burn- I’ve tried with a small chip and a lighter.
Graham
July 12, 2012 at 11:45 am (UTC -7) Link to this comment
I want to see:
1. fossil vs (steel) cheese grater
2. fossil vs red-hot needle
I am not a geologist. I just like experiments.
Lockwood
July 12, 2012 at 11:49 am (UTC -7) Link to this comment
It would utterly destroy a cheese grater, and pretty much shrug off a red hot needle.
Graham
July 12, 2012 at 12:36 pm (UTC -7) Link to this comment
1. I can grate grains off a lump of orthoquartzite with a cheese grater. Why do think that the fossil is more firmly stuck together than that?
2. You are convinced that it is completely mineralized. Why?
Lockwood
July 12, 2012 at 12:57 pm (UTC -7) Link to this comment
1. With no disrespect intended, I seriously doubt that, unless your cheese grater is made of tungsten carbide or some similar material, and you did specify steel.
2. No, I do not believe this rock is “completely mineralized,” but it’s nature is such that I *do* believe it would “pretty much shrug off a red hot needle.” That’s not to say it would be absolutely unaffected, but the effect would not be perceivable to unaided senses. I do have a photo, poor quality, different sample, same stuff, taken of a thin section under a microscope. It’s in a publication Dana read during the recent trip, so I’ll have to photograph the photograph, and the quality won’t be great, but at least it’ll convey a sense of how and why I can make some of the assertions I have in this comment thread, with the degree of confidence I suppose it appears that I have. To reiterate, this is a pretty weird material. There *is* a fairly easy experiment I’d like to carry out someday, which I’ll discuss when Dana posts “the answer.”
Brian
July 12, 2012 at 12:45 pm (UTC -7) Link to this comment
Graphite?
The Rose
July 12, 2012 at 3:16 pm (UTC -7) Link to this comment
…I’ll take a stab — fusain?
says its a “fossilized charcoal”, but I can’t imagine it could scratch steel……
Rob
July 12, 2012 at 6:45 pm (UTC -7) Link to this comment
I’ll hedge my bet with two guesses (cheating?)
I’ve seen something similar at the margins of a marine deposited coal seam where the sample was very high in silt derived from high quartz and feldspar sediments. Essentially a non-combustible, hard, powdery ‘coal’.
As an alternative, a mineralised fossil high in both silica and manganese oxide (or probably manganese and iron oxides). Possibly associated with geothermal vents (faults or volcanic).
Entirely prepared to be wrong.
Lithified Detritus
July 12, 2012 at 8:37 pm (UTC -7) Link to this comment
Fossil horsetail – Equisetum or Calamites? Horsetails are sometimes called “scouring rush” due to their high silica content.
McC2lhu iz not nu.
July 12, 2012 at 11:26 pm (UTC -7) Link to this comment
STRING OR NOTHING!!!
Oh, shoot. Wrong riddle. :P
Cujo359
July 13, 2012 at 2:03 am (UTC -7) Link to this comment
Is it possible for obsidian to be pulverized enough to form fossils? I remember seeing a lot of it in Oregon, and it looks a lot like that little rock. Wikipedia doesn’t mention obsidian as being a possible ingredient in tuff, but I’ll guess that it’s something like that since no one else seems to have.