Dana's Dojo: Building That Bridge When We Come to It

(Blogger’s note: It’s the return of the Dojo! For those of you out there who are trying to write fiction, or want to know how writers write fiction, Tuesdays from here until spring will probably be fun. For those of you with no interest, at least you’ll know to spend your Tuesdays elsewhere. Enjoy!)

Today in the Dojo: How to craft transitions that allow your readers to get from here to there without worrying about falling in.

We build too many walls and not enough bridges.

-Isaac Newton

This is one of the few columns I’ve actually put time and effort into researching.  The results were interesting.  And somewhat daunting.  It seems that transitions are the kind of thing nobody wants to talk about.
 
I went through every issue of every writer’s magazine I own, at least fifty or sixty mags.  Out of all those hundreds of articles, covering a span of several years, I found exactly two on transitions.  One dealt with transitions in non-fiction articles, which is of some use to fiction writers but far too limited for our purposes.  The other purported to deal with “Transitions and Flashbacks.”  Transitions were dealt with: briefly, vaguely, and with a strong sense that the author would rather be doing anything other than talking about transitions.

When I turned to my how-to books on writing, the results were even worse.  Some mentioned transitions not at all.  Others included a mention, perhaps two if the writer was in a particularly generous mood.  All told, out of ten books that supposedly taught writing start to finish, I think I ended up with enough material to fill a page.  Double-spaced, mind you.  Large font.

I’m not even going to set up the staw-man questions.  I’m just going to say it: Transitions are extremely important.  They’re one of the easiest things to get wrong, hardest to get right, and yet are absolutely essential to making a story or novel work.  You can have all of the other elements of fiction writing nailed, but inept transitions will destroy all of that hard work.  Put it like this: imagine a house built with all of the finest materials, granite countertops, oak cabinets, hardwood floors, brass faucets… all of the really gorgeous, expensive stuff.  Now, paint the walls with whitewash and furnish it with cast-offs even Goodwill didn’t want, and try to tell me it still looks as nice.

No?  Didn’t think so.

I have no idea why such a vital component of writing has been so terribly neglected.  Maybe it’s raw, naked fear.  Maybe it’s one of those QED things and it’s just assumed we’re experts at birth.  Maybe it’s a trade secret. 

Well, my darlings, I am not afraid.  I make no assumptions.  And I’m about to reveal the secret.

It’s a big one.  So, pull on your trenchcoat, tip your hat over your eyes, and meet me in a dark quiet corner of the park where we shall feed the ducks, pretend we don’t know one another, and I’ll pass you the first secrets on the sly…

Transitions: The Menace and the Marvel

I direct your attention to the far end of the park, across the pond.  Do you see that pretty little stone bridge there, over the stream?  I should hope so: you walked over it to get here.  That’s a grand example of a transition, that is.

Transitions are simply a literary method of getting the reader from one place to another.  It’s truly that basic.  We are here, we want to be over there, but without a bridge we’d be going for an unplanned swim.  What could be more easy?

Well, try building a bridge with no instructions, and you’ll see just how difficult it is.  Simple in the concept, complex in the execution.  And like bridges, transitions come in all shapes, sizes and styles, and can get us across all kinds of gaps, but they’ll only look nice if we know how to build them.

Knowing how also entails knowing where.  Put it like this: you wouldn’t want the Golden Gate Bridge plonked across the ornamental creek in your back yard.  And San Franciscans would have been pretty upset if, instead of the Golden Gate, the architects built a footbridge spanning the Bay.  Transitions work the same way within a story.  Six paragraph transitions might work brilliantly for a novel, but they could collapse a short story.  An ornate, lyrical transition will add beauty and grace to an epic work of fancy prose, but probably won’t look right bunged down in the middle of an action scene in a suspense novel.

Transitions have one final thing in common with bridges: you must put them in the place where they will be most useful.  Neither the Golden Gate nor our classic little footbridge will do much good in the flats of Death Valley or the middle of a football stadium.

But they seem nearly miraculous, don’t they?  Transitions keep the story flowing, keep the reader in the know, and allow you to cut out the boring bits.  With them, you can cut to the chase and show only the essentials.  They’re the workhorse of “tell” vs. “show”.  There are times when showing would be too much.  Transitions give you the opportunity to tell what must be told without becoming a pedantic windbag.

They also perform all sorts of useful tricks.  You can use them to up the tension or decrease it, control pacing, and comment on the events.  They’re a great tool for characterization, especially in limited viewpoint stories like 1st Person or 3rd Person Limited.  What the narrator chooses to share in detail and what they choose to gloss over speaks volumes about what kind of person they are.  Let’s say your character’s going in for an operation: if they speak at length about the pre-op nerves and procedures and give a detailed description of their recovery, but gloss over the surgery itself even though they nearly died on the table, that says something.  That transition – “Aside from my heart stopping unexpectedly, the operation went great!” – tells you a lot about how this person’s handling this event.

A transition is most commonly used at the beginnings and endings of scenes.  In rare instances, you’ll use one within a scene. No matter where they’re placed, every transition must perform these vital functions: they must let the reader know there’s been a change, what kind, and whose eyes are seeing now.  The transition must give that information right up front, or it’s not doing its job.  If you remember nothing else from this treatise, remember that.

So, we come to our first task: learn where transitions are of most use, how to scout the terrain, and which sorts of transitions are available to us.

Let’s have a look at some of the places transitions are most useful, shall we?

A Shift in Time:  Transitions can cover spans of time from seconds to moments, hours, days or years without having to detail each and every event that takes place within that time.

A Change of Place: Transitions move characters and actions from one location to another expeditiously, without subjecting the reader to a travelogue.

Mood Swings:  Transitions allow you to change the mood without making your story look like a raving lunatic.  They provide the reader a logical path to follow from happy to sad, angry to amused, nostalgia to anticipation… whatever mood fits the bill.

Change Your Tone: Transitions keep you from sounding flat.  If you don’t want to get branded as a cynic, an inveterate optimist, or something else of that sort, a transition will allow you to change tone without jolting the reader.

Action(s)!: Transitions can do more than one thing in this area.  You can change the pace from fast to slow (or vice versa).  You can also cut between actions, either consecutive or concurrent. 

Exposition Without Pain: Transitions give you an excellent option for presenting necessary exposition without bogging the story down in dry background detail or dramatizing every single thing.  You can use transitions to introduce a completely different situation that will become vital to the main thrust of the plot soon, bring new characters on stage (or talk about them behind their backs), bring in the past without resorting to a flashback….  The possibilities are nearly endless.  However, so is the potential abuse: tread with extreme caution.  Here be dragons that could eat your readers!

Now that we know the purposes transitions serve, let’s explore some of their basic architecture.  I’ll begin with what at least fifty percent of the population believes matters most: size.  Well, in the case of transitions, size truly does matter.  So let’s see what’s on offer:

A Word or Two:  This is probably self-explanitory.  We’re all familiar with the words that tip off a transition: later, meanwhile, then, before…  The list goes on, as lists tend to do.  Sometimes these short transitions show up as more than a single word, but here we’re talking a movement within a sentence.

Complete Sentences: Also nearly intuitive.  We often see transitions accomplished in the form of a sentence.  Most of us write our transitions that way.

Paragraph: Sometimes, you need a little more time to set the scene and get all the actors out of the dressing rooms where they’re having hysterics.  This one’s still pretty quick and very appropriate to a short story (unless, of course, you’re writing flash fiction, in which case I wouldn’t use this length were I you).

Pages and Pages: This might take a few of you by surprise.  Some transitions, especially in novels, can take up a page or more.  They can be complete scenes that do nothing but act as a bridge.  And it’s perfectly all right to use them! 

Now you believe me when I say size matters, don’t you?  Imagine a short story of ten pages in which three were a transitional scene.  That’s a wee much tell for the show.  When considering what size your transition should be, you must contemplate a few factors: size of the work, type of work, pace you’re trying to set, and what the transition is bridging.  It’s a lot to think about, but if you’re having trouble with this part, relax.  It’ll become second nature with time and practice.

But as all the ladies know, size isn’t everything.  There are othe

r important elements to consider.  Back to bridges for a moment: the Golden Gate would not be half as wonderful spanning the Bay if it hadn’t been painted red and if the designers hadn’t created those lovely elegant swoops.  Now, these are both functional things: the paint protects the bridge and those swoops are a part of what makes it stronger.  But the same purpose could have been achieved with less artistry.  If the bridge had been bunged over a wide canyon in the middle of nowhere on a railway line, it needn’t be so pretty.  The decorative elements of a transition are the same way.  They support the function, but you won’t be wanting anything too utilitarian in a really lyrical piece of fiction, for instance.  So let’s take a look at our design options and see what we have available:

Simple: Which is just what it says.  If you don’t want much attention called to the transition, use the simplest language appropriate to the job.  These are short, sweet and to the point normally.  Even if they’re long, they’re stark. 

Narrative Summary: This is sort of like the introductory bits to fairy tales that give you enough information to understand what the background is and who the people are.  This type is versatile: you can make it poetic, or funny, or profound, but its common element is that it’s a sort of story within the story, without dramatization.  It’s a great way to impart information necessary for moving us from here to there that doesn’t really support a fully realized scene of its own.  You’ll recognize it from detective novels, especially.  And stories where the main character ages forty years and leaves out the boring bits. 

Connected Action: This one’s really neat.  You end with one action and begin with the same action only different: different day, person, mood, interpretation, what have you.  For example, you might be ending with Character A staring in dismay at a wreck on the highway, and begin the next scene with Character B also staring, but B’s a firefighter and is making sure all the victims are out of the wreckage.  Another variation on this theme is a continued action: I put down my brush, I pick up my brush – two days later.

Same Setting: This seems to be a favorite of playwrights.  You know: dining room, three days later….  That sort of thing.  The faces may have changed, events may have moved on in the meantime, but we’re back in the place we left from the scene before.

Repetition or Echo:  A little tricker.  You’re taking a key word or phrase from the last sentence of the previous scene and repeating it back to establish the connection between the scenes.  It can be a repetition of words or action, or just about anything else.  You have to work hard to make sure it doesn’t seem contrived, but done right, it can be beautiful.

Mood: With this, you capture the essence of the scene before, whether that be sadness, anticipation, etc., and carry it on to the new scene, which of course takes place in a different time or location or with different people.

Background Element: This can be anything from the background of the previous scene.  Weather, perfume, food, drink, a song, a similar place (but not the same, or that would be Same Setting), clothes…..  Anything present in the background of the previous scene can carry forward into the next scene, forging strong ties between the two.  It’s a subtle but powerful method.  Like seasoning, it should be used sparingly in most cases. 

Now, for our final bit: the terrain.  How do we know where a transition is of most use?  How do we know which type to use where?  I’ve sort of hinted around at those issues in the above descriptions, but let me give you a quick and dirty list that might help you survey the terrain a bit more easily:

Alpha and Omega: If you’re at the beginning or end of a scene or chapter, you’re probably needing a transition.

You’ve Skipped Something: If there’s a change in time, place, action or anything of significance, you most likely need a bridge to get from here to there.  Rule of thumb: the more drastic the change, the greater the probability you’ll need a transition.

Shut Up and Get to the Point!: If you’re taking forever to dramatize something and it’s not really adding much to the whole, skip the blow-by-blow and use a narrative summary transition instead.  Little bits of dialogue or concrete detail could spice it up, but overall, you’ll be telling, not showing.  And yes, as I said earlier, it’s completely okay to do that as long as you’re not summarizing something that should have been dramatized, or letting it drag on endlessly.  How to tell the difference is a topic for another day.  Just think of it this way: if your friend was telling you this, would you want them to ‘splain or just sum up?

And that’s it, folks.  That’s really all there is to it.  Your toolbox is full, your head is crammed full of blueprints, the surveyor’s located the proper place and your materials have arrived.  You’re ready to build.

Dana's Dojo: Building That Bridge When We Come to It
{advertisement}

Wise Readers Wanted

Those of you who were with me last year know that I keep a writing blog, A Slight Risk of Insanity.  And it’s shortly going to be open for business again.  ‘Tis the winter writing season, after all.

Right now, you may be thinking, “What, no link?”  No, indeed.  It’s an invitation-only enterprise.  Members of my exclusive Wise-Reader Club get access to excerpts available nowhere else.  They also get a chance to participate in the process.  If you’ve ever wanted to become an important part of a fiction writer’s work, this is a not-to-be-missed opportunity for you.  Writing might seem like a solitary endeavor, and it often is, but it’s not something we can always do alone.  We need sounding boards, consultants, people who know more than we do and people who can provide a fresh pair of eyes, not to mention a reader’s perspective.  And did I mention, exclusive access to excerpts?

If this sounds like something you want access to, all you have to do is send me an email at dhunterauthor at yahoo dot com, and justlikethat, you shall become one of my Wise Readers.

I’d be honored to have you.

Wise Readers Wanted

Images and Words

Dearest Paul, flattery will get you a link.  *blush*

Dana, Chauncey, and Dale strike me as three bloggers who each in his or her own way is stretching the medium, and pioneering what can be done with it.
I seriously doubt they see themselves as in any way special, but I think if you were to read much more of their blogs than I can republish here, you yourself might see them as exceptional writers by any standards.

I completely agree – I don’t see myself as special, much less “stretching the medium.”  I’ve seen myself as a camp follower. Other bloggers blazed the trail.  So what if I occasionally manage to turn a phrase like a Biellmann spin?  That’s a rare occasion.  Most of the time, I’m just stuttering around on the ice like any other wanna-be Elvis Stojko at the local rink.

This isn’t the medium I intend to master anyway.  But I love it, because I can come here and write without (much) pressure.  I don’t have to sweat blood, rewrite, edit, delete all and start over.  Just babble and hit “publish.”  Sometimes, I give it a quick once-over in an attempt to catch any typos in the act.  This is why it amazes me anybody actually reads this stuff, much less enjoys it.  I give it some thought, some effort, but it doesn’t demand my all.  Sometimes, I wonder if it would be better if I showed it the same devotion I show the novel.

Then again, if I did that, you lot wouldn’t see another post from me until roughly 2057, so perhaps we should continue as we started.

But this is what Paul said that really got me thinking:

I’m not sure, but I think really good writers like Dana usually feel words much more deeply than the rest of us.  And it probably has something to do with why they are such good writers.

The problem with this statement is that Paul is also a really good writer, so I’m not sure I feel words any more deeply than he does.  In fact, at times, I suspect it’s rather the opposite – he’s always seemed to experience more than I do.  But then he says he’s never been moved by the written word the way I have, and says he needs perky nekkid boobies as an assist.  Fair enough.  If it makes him feel any better, I hated Lord of the Rings until the movies came out.  I needed the images to make me appreciate the words.  Then Tolkien made me fall deeper in love with language.  And here we are.

I think we all need images and words.  Some of us are better than others at getting images out of words.  Sometimes, some of us are too good at it – I not only saw all of Old Yeller in my mind’s eye, but ended up damned near paralyzed at the end.  My legs literally went numb, not because I was sitting on them, but because I’d identified so much with the characters.  And don’t talk to me about all the weeping I did over that fucking dog.  Only thing that was worse was Summer of the Monkeys.

But would The Doors have affected me so much in book form?  No.  I doubt the intensity of it, the bizarreness of it, could have worked without the sight and sound.

What I’m saying is, no one should feel any less of a writer or a reader if they need some bare nekkid boobie pictures to help them along.  Images and words belong together.

And now, if you’ll excuse me, I’m off to try executing a death spiral all by my lonesome.  The time has come.

It’s time to write.

Images and Words

My Triumphant Return

Yes, I abandoned you all for three nights with the Wheel of Time.  Can you ever forgive me?

For a while, there, it looked like all was for naught, too.  I didn’t think I’d finish last night.  But the time changed, giving that magical extra hour, and so we made it from page just-shy-of-500 to page 843 at just about 6 in the ay-em.

Here endeth the “I’m-still-alive-only-very-badly-eyestrained” announcement.  Regular blogging shall resume later today.

Thank you, my darlings, for understanding.

My Triumphant Return

Wherein I Admit I Am a Lily-Livered Coward

There are moments, when I’m watching or reading something, where the story leaves me hyperventilating.  Shivering, shaking, aching, breaking, flying apart in fragments.  Crying, yes, because strong emotion of any kind has this tendency to sting the eyes, stun the brain, leave a person feeling like they’ve shaken hands with the third rail while breaking the fourth wall.

First time I saw Fellowship of the Ring was like that.  Reading Sandman was like that, only worse.  Seeing the final episode of House season six did it again.  Oops.

And it’s in those moments that I realize I am a coward.  I am terrified.  Terrorized, possibly traumatized, by my own fucking writing.  You see, I don’t like to admit that I have it in me to do such things to other people.  Make them laugh until their bellies rupture, cry until their sinuses close, punch out a wall, scream with joy or agony.  Make them love, hate, suffer, live and die on a page.  I sometimes like to believe I can’t do it.  It’s easier that way.  Less responsibility, more time for relationships.  Be a better friend, maybe get a degree and a decent job, enjoy the world while I’m still healthy enough to do it. Life would be a lot easier if I could just keep running scared.  I could be the person I’ve never wanted to be, that person other people don’t consider mentally ill or gifted or both.

But then come the moments when everything starts shaking, Force Twelve, 9 on the Richter Scale (which has been replaced by the moment magnitude scale, but who outside of seismologists gives a shit, right?).  These moments, wherein I realize, I’m gonna have to face it, I have got it in me to do this to people.  I’ve got the characters.  I’ve got the stories.  I’ve got the world.  I’ve quite possibly got the talent, and even if I don’t, that can be convincingly faked given enough ambition.  And I want to do this.  Terrified of doing it.  Anything would be easier.  I’m a coward for wanting to run away from it.  But because I’m a godsdamned motherfucking lily-livered coward, I’m too scared to walk away, much less run.

So.  Much as I’ve questioned the fact lately, much as I’ve tried to excuse myself from it and tried to find other ways to occupy my time, put it off for some safely future date, the fact remains that I am a writer, and I am going to write a book that will rip my heart out through my nose, take my guts along with it, and quite possibly drive a few of my more delicate readers to suicide if I do the job too well, and I am going to do that fucking job because there is nothing else I can do.  I will dedicate further years of my life, potentially sacrifice friendships, and definitely sacrifice any possibility of a romantic relationship and a normal life in order to make myself a stressed-out, driven, obsessive, neurotic, miserable yet ecstatic human being, because the only thing that terrifies me worse than doing this is not doing it.

Writers in the audience will understand what this post is about.  Non-writers won’t.  And that’s okay.  I don’t expect you to. 

I can’t wait to get started on terrorizing myself.*

*Just as soon as I’ve finished the next-to-last book of the Wheel of Time, that is.  Writers in the audience will understand that’s actually work.  Non-writers won’t.  That’s okay.  I don’t expect them to.
Wherein I Admit I Am a Lily-Livered Coward

I Agree With Glenn Greenwald

In this column, pointed out by my dear Paul.  So spend the time you would’ve spent reading a post by me and go read Glenn’s instead.  Then bask in the warm glow of knowing the Blue Dog dumbfucks and their buddy Blanche Lincoln got the absolute stuffing knocked out of them.

Timid Dems may choose to believe they got their asses handed to them on a stake because they weren’t Con enough, but if they do, they’re just as dumbfuck as the dogs. 

And that’s all I have to say about such matters at the moment, because I haven’t finished House season six yet, the next Wheel of Time novel’s sitting on my entry table howling for me to take it from the box, and Written in Stone isn’t far behind.  My characters are screaming for my attention, old friends are crawling out of the woodwork, new friends are popping up like mushrooms in our lawn at work after the rain, the cat still thinks she’s freezing to death, and my house would seriously appreciate some scrubbing bubbles.  In other words, I’m like killing snakes.  That’s a Welsh phrase meaning busy.

Too busy to do more than tell cowering Dems to suck it up, grow a pair, own the progressive agenda, and learn a lesson from Cons about being motherfucking ruthless when it comes to pursuing an agenda.  If they can’t learn that simple lesson after all that’s happened, I’m not the one who can teach them.  As for Con stupidity, pounding it’s not fun anymore – I like harder targets.  This is like shooting fish in a barrel – using tactical nukes. 

Don’t worry, we’ll get round to spanking them this winter when they have another go at raping this country up the arse.  I might even give up snark for sarcasm.  I’d try satire, but unfortunately, judging from the way they fell for Stephen Colbert’s character, they don’t quite understand what satire is.  Too bad – it’s always more fun when the victim understands what’s about to destroy them.  And believe me when I say that satire has destroyed more than one kingdom.  When you have to rely on a base as imbecilic as the Teabaggers, well, let’s just say that despite a few battles won, the war’s not looking too good.

Shutting up now.  House beckons.  I’ll get all y’all some geology a bit later, and stay tuned for some culture as well, my darlings.

I Agree With Glenn Greenwald

A Bloodbath, Not a Massacre

Because if it was a massacre, Sharron Angle and Christine O’Donnell would’ve ended up added to our list of national embarrassments.  As it is, we just have to worry about John “Agent Orange” Boehner parading around as Speaker of the House for the next two years.  Anyone know where I can get airsick bags in bulk?

Great job, America.  I do hope you enjoy the endless round of idiocy leading to the next Great Recession the lackwit majority of you voted for.  Those of you who don’t pay attention to politics might not realize what voting for Cons does, but you’d think all those episodes of CSI would’ve taught you that arsonists aren’t so much interested in setting backfires, but pouring gasoline on the conflagration.

At least I know the majority of my readers are smart enough not to give them matches.  You, my darlings, are my only consolation.  Well, you and endless episodes of House.  Which I am now going back to, as I haven’t enough alcohol handy to ease the annoyance.  It’s too bad.  I should’ve had a glass of something good handy with which to toast Blanche Lincoln’s loss – my other consolation, as she’s the one Senate Dem up for reelection this year whose unceremonious asskicking I can wholeheartedly applaud.  Her loss is our definite gain.

I shall leave you all with the wise words of Phoebes-in-Santa-Fe:

Okay, so we mourn our losses tonight and we get back to work tomorrow. 

Indeed we do.

A Bloodbath, Not a Massacre