Today’s opining on the public discourse.
I’m sure all of you have noticed by now that the right’s come completely unhinged. Well, more completely unhinged. Sonia Sotomayor’s nomination’s released liberated them from the last thread of restraint.
Some of you may point out a few of the right-wing voices denouncing the right-wing fucktards. And to that I say: bunkum. At least so far as official Cons are concerned. Do I believe Cornyn’s found his last remaining drops of decency and decorum in a forgotten corner of his sock drawer? Do I think Michael Steele’s had an epiphany? Do I think Karl Rove’s suddenly on the side of angels because he’s lost his stomach for ugly smears?
Simply put: not no but fuck no. After all, the handwringers were merrily bashing Sotomayor for all they’re worth just a few days ago. Rove insulted her intelligence, Steele insulted her job performance, and Cornyn’s still got Gingrich fundraising for him. Convincing outrage: FAIL.
Besides, it’s a little hard to take their mild fussing seriously when they’re administering gentle rebukes in the face of inflamed rhetoric like this:
And here I thought Tom Tancredo, Newt Gingrich, and Rush Limbaugh would be the most offensive conservative critics of Sonia Sotomayor. How could I forget this clown?
Yesterday on his radio show, conservative host G. Gordon Liddy continued the right wing’s all-out assault on Judge Sonia Sotomayor. […]
“I understand that they found out today that Miss Sotomayor is a member of La Raza, which means in illegal alien, ‘the race.’ And that should not surprise anyone because she’s already on record with a number of racist comments.” […]
“Let’s hope that the key conferences aren’t when she’s menstruating or something, or just before she’s going to menstruate. That would really be bad. Lord knows what we would get then.”
So, according to this prominent conservative media personality, the Spanish language is synonymous with “illegal alien,” and women are, by nature, poorly suited to serving as justices.
Do I hear anybody denouncing their good buddy Liddy? Going once? Going twice?
Here’s [Weekly Standard’s Michael] Goldfarb:In October 1974, Princeton allowed Sotomayor and two other students to initiate a seminar, for full credit and with the university’s blessings, on the Puerto Rican experience and its relation to contemporary America.
I went to Princeton but somehow I never got to teach my own class, or grade my own work. One wonders how Sotomayor judged her work in that class, and whether the grade helped or hindered her efforts to graduate with honors.
And here’s the Princeton press release Taylor cites:So they [Sotomayor and two other students] did what scores of other Princeton Students have been able to do for the past six years: they initiated their own seminar … The seminar is being taught by Dr. Peter E. Winn, Assistant Professor of History and a specialist in Latin American affairs. Under a plan adopted by Princeton in 1968 students are free to propose seminars on special topics to a faculty Committee on Course of Study. … In the past 12 terms 132 such courses have been approved and offered.”The release also makes clear that the seminar Sotomayor initiated had been offered twice before.So Goldfarb’s snide comments about Sotomayor teaching her own class and grading her own work seem to be completely baseless: she didn’t teach the class.Stuart Taylor, just for the record, is the genius who said that Paula Jones had a strong case. A person with a functioning brain might have fact-checked him before swallowing his bullshit. Goldfarb didn’t. Ladies and gentlemen, I rest my own case.
I encourage the right-wing frothers to stay on the attack. It’s always amusing when Nooners starts calling people in her own party idiots and tells them to start playing grownup. And I’d like to see how long it takes before Hispanic support for the GOP completely vanishes:
Top-ranking Republican strategists who specialize in Hispanic outreach say they are outraged, disturbed and concerned by the type of reception Barack Obama’s pick for the Supreme Court has received from conservative activists.
The rhetoric has been enough to make Republican strategists in heavily Latino states cringe — concerned that such slights could cement Democrats advantages among a growing and increasingly influential political constituency.
“Of course this disturbs me,” said Lionel Sosa, one of the more influential Hispanic media advisers in the GOP. “I’m not surprised at Rush Limbaugh but I’m very surprised at Speaker Gingrich because he is one of the key people who knows the importance of the Latino vote to the Republican Party. He must realize how his rhetoric, if it does influence any Hispanics, how damaging it could be. This [confirmation] is something that is going to happen anyway. For a senator to have strong opposition to her, they are either not aware of the impact Latinos will have on the next election or they don’t care.”
I’d say both, actually.
Another right-wing smear against Sotomayor is her supposed abrasiveness. Christie Hardin Smith has the right quote for the occasion:
I’ll let Kevin Russell, who was on a WH-sponsored call I sat in on the other day, speak for me with his manly wisdom:
I understand that she has the reputation for being tough and doesn’t suffer fools gladly.
I understand some of those fools may not be happy about that.