Dana's Woodshed Part 2: Bigoted Buffoons

I usually don’t filch my news from Pharyngula, considering how many of you are disciples of our Cephalopod Overlord, but George W. pointed this perfect pearl of deluded dumbfuckery, and I have to agree: it’s worth reproducing here:

You really don’t want to read about another terrifying crazy Republican woman, do you? Too bad. Here it is: a good Christian homeschooling mom who doesn’t like gay people. And by “doesn’t like”, I mean “wants them stoned to death and everything they touch blown up.”

A friend recently sent me this article about a “gay-friendly” high school. If we were living in a biblical society, homosexuality would be punishable by death so such a school would be unnecessary. Although I’m against the special accommodations, perhaps this new trend of segregation will protect straight kids from these predators. With any luck, some radical will blow up the gay school. No, I’m not condoning vigilantism–I’m merely saying that it would be poetic justice.

Firstly: I weep for the quality of homeschooling when the schoolers have no fucking clue what “poetic justice” actually is. Since gays aren’t in the habit of blowing up “straight” schools, and therefore aren’t likely to blow up a gay-friendly school by mistake, there is zero chance of poetic justice.

Secondly: I would like to thank this bigot for providing such a stark demonstration of the moral foundations of Biblical teachings. For those more moderate (read: less murderous) Christians, this should be a rather shocking wake-up call as to what we could expect if our society were, in all its particulars, biblical.

Thirdly: For all of you who don’t believe gays don’t face homicidal hatred from decent Christian folk, this should have just rudely ripped the scales from your eyes.

As a writer, I shouldn’t experience failures of imagination, but I have never been able to wrap my mind around anti-gay animas. I find it easier to comprehend the inner life of a shark. I’ve often found sharks pleasanter company than these pious folks who believe that sexual orientation is such a threat to civilization that gays should be subjected to a Holocaust.

And finally, a word to the author of this filth: you are most certainly “condoning vigilantism,” you fucktard. You can’t weasel out of it by saying you’re not when your entire piece cheers it on.

People like her convinced me God doesn’t exist. I could think of no reason why, if He did, and He was as loving as these morons claimed He is, why He didn’t turn them over His knee for a little tough love. It was only much later that the thought occurred to me that He might be the biggest bigot of them all, but by then, I had other reasons not to believe.

Right, then, on to our next bigot: Ames at Submitted to a Candid World recently published a fantastic piece on patterns in presidential elections, which is worth reading in and of itself. But it’s the comments I now direct your attention to, and in particular, one RandyT, whose pearls of wisdom include the following:

eletists like you are the reason this country is in such trouble. George Bush has done everything to protect America and you America hating types can only point out the problems not solutions. you solution is more government more goverment more more more. Why? Is it because you don’t have the courage to help yourself? you make me sick.

RandyT, I refuse to be lectured by a nasty, small-minded jerk who can’t spell and has such a poor grasp on proper capitalization. You make me sick, you inane lackwit.

Ames is a wonderful human being. He and his readers spent the thread educating RandyT, trying to talk him down from his ledge of stupidity before he could do himself an injury. We need a lot more kind and caring people like them. I wish I could be one. Alas, I am more of the Riggs school of suicide prevention:

Confession time: In my darkest moments, when I’ve been inundated by the relentless idiocy of wingnuts, religious frothers, and other assorted batshit-insane 28-percenters, along with the other 20% or so of this country still slavishly loyal to the Cons, I do wish McCain would be elected. It is for the same reason that Riggs took that suicide on a several-story fall: I hope it would be the short, sharp shock that would jolt them out of their stupidity. I want them to come begging for Obama’s “socialist” policies. I want them to grovel for his foreign policy. I want them to see that the destruction Bush began is only the beginning, and that the worst disaster we’ve ever faced isn’t an African-American in office, but another fucking Con.

But it’s not worth destroying America completely just to prove to these people how deluded they are. Besides, unlike a man having a very bad day, they’re too lost in their fantasy world for anything so small as the total disintegration of America to snap them out of it.

So. If Ames & Co. can’t reach ’em, and a good session with the Smack-o-Matic doesn’t correct ’em, fuck ’em. There’s enough sane people in America now to push these bigoted fuckwits to the fringes where they belong.

Dana's Woodshed Part 2: Bigoted Buffoons
{advertisement}

Dana's Woodshed Part I: The Fruits of Their Fuckery

Gather round, my darlings, and help me take a few deserving souls out to the woodshed. The Smack-o-Matic 3000 is about to get the workout of its young life, thanks to you.

Our first spanking is administered to Congresspeople Behaving Badly.

Let us begin with Michele “OMG Libruls R Anti-Amurkin!” Bachmann, R. MN, who was thoroughly and lovingly savaged by Cujo359 on Sunday. His post includes several items I hadn’t tracked down, such as polling data:

As you can see, there have only been two polls conducted publicly in the district. Both are by a Democratic polling organization, Grove Insight. Nevertheless, a couple of very interesting things are obvious:

  1. Bachmann, the incumbent, is pretty unpopular with the voters. In neither poll did she garner more than 42 percent. Even adding the margin of error to that total, she has less than 47 percent, according to the polls. As I’ve discussed before, that’s a troubling sign for an incumbent.
  2. Tinklenberg is growing on the electorate. While I don’t necessarily trust the magnitudes all that much, the trends in a poll are always interesting. Here, Bachmann’s is no appreciable gain, and her opponent’s is that he’s gaining ground.
  3. Even if no Bachmann supporters change their minds thanks to her latest bigoted tirade, her opponent Elwyn Tinklenberg is only behind by about 4 percent, with 15 percent undecided.

Michele has proven El’s bestest fundraiser. And what is El doing with all of that largesse?

Rep. Michele Bachmann’s (R-MN) Democratic opponent El Tinklenberg is taking advantage of the huge windfall of donation he’s gotten in the wake of Bachmann’s Red-Scare-inciting Hardball appearance — he’s raised $700,000 in the last few days, and counting — and is spending $188,000 to air this new spot introducing himself to voters:

Viva la differance! You’ll notice that instead of using his funds to engage in a culture-war style frontal assault, he’s attacking obliquely by demonstrating massive accomplishments. Between that, the relentless loops of Michele’s intemperate remarks, and what I’m sure is going to be a thorough beating by the DNC (which is gleefully unloading a $1 millon truckload of cash on this race), I do believe El might have this sewn up by week’s end.

Note to Republicons: please say or do more stupid shit.

Well, that was fast:

Bill Sali, one of my favorite nutty Congresspeople, makes the news again:

“Congressman Bill Sali and his campaign staff disrupted a NewsChannel 7 reporter and a representative for his opponent during an interview Tuesday in Downtown Boise.

KTVB reporter Ysabel Bilbao was interviewing Walt Minnick’s campaign director John Foster Wednesday afternoon. During the interview, someone loudly yelled and was laughing during the interview at the Grove plaza.

Bilbao and Foster initially ignored the intrusion, but quickly noticed the source of the heckling — Sali and members of his staff. (…)

Foster said he saw Sali making faces at him and holding up “bunny ears.””

Sali, apparently, hasn’t advanced past third grade insults. Of course, comparing him to third graders is an unforgivable insult to elementary schoolers everywhere – I seriously doubt many of them believe crude oil grows on trees, or demonstrate dramatic ignorance about the Founding Fathers’ views on religious diversity in Congress. Unless, of course, they’re raised by people like Bill Sali, who is so popular among his colleagues that some wish to definistrate him.

So how are those stunningly stupid personal qualities and remarkably infantile public behavior working out for him? Oh, deary me:

Poll: Democrat Leading Bill Sali

A new SurveyUSA poll shows House candidate Walt Minnick (D-ID) leading Rep. Bill Sali (R) by a 51%-45% margin. This deep-red district should be off-limits to Democrats, but Sali is a controversial figure due to various personal antics — most recently he walked up while a Minnick staffer was speaking to a reporter, and proceeded to loudly heckle the staffer and give him the bunny ears. [emphasis added]

I do believe we’re standing at the threshold of a new political era. Dems will no longer have to run attack ads, but merely stand bemusedly by while Cons attack themselves, and wonder what to do with the mountains o’ cash generated thereby.

Dana's Woodshed Part I: The Fruits of Their Fuckery

Walking the Walk: Palin Opens Mouth, Inserts Foot

Sarah Palin’s talent for fucking herself over every time she opens her mouth is truly mind-boggling:

“Here’s the difference between John McCain and our ticket and Barack Obama and Joe Biden,” she said. “We don’t just talk the talk, we walk the walk. And that’s why in not just that first speech, but in every speech I give, I talk about being an advocate and a friend in the White House for our families who have members who have these special needs.” [emphasis added]


When asked by “gotcha” journalist Shelby Sheehan of KRNV just how she and McCain planned to walk the walk they were talking about, Palin tripped over her own feet:

Alaska Governor and Republican vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin says autism is an issue “near and dear” to her heart and she can’t wait to get to work helping more than 5,000 Nevada families affected by it. However, when pressed, she was unable to provide details on a plan to do that.

[snip]

“There are a lot of wasteful expenditures in the federal (government),” Palin said. “Let’s get rid of those and put them into strengthening NIH (National Institutes of Health) and these other areas where we can help our kids with autism.”

Palin did not name any specific expenditure she wanted to cut in favor of funding for autism research or services, nor did she name what specific programs she’d like to fund in order to help those families.

Sarah Palin walking the walk: epic fucking fail.

Shelby Sheehan perpetrating journalism upon her: priceless.

(Tip o’ the shot glass to Kula2316 at Daily Kos, who also found the best quote o’ the day: “Widespread antagonism toward Obama in mid August gave way in September to overwhelming horror over McCain picking Palin as his vice presidential nominee.” I’m sure I have no idea why undecided voters in Florida would feel that way. Heh.)

Walking the Walk: Palin Opens Mouth, Inserts Foot

The British Say It Best

I’ve always loved the British talent for dismemberment by seeming compliment. Observe:

Boris Johnson, the lavishly Tory Mayor of London …

However well-intentioned it was, the catastrophic and unpopular intervention in Iraq has served in some parts of the world to discredit the very idea of western democracy.

The recent collapse of the banking system, and the humiliating resort to semi-socialist solutions, has done a great deal to discredit – in some people’s eyes – the idea of free-market capitalism.

Democracy and capitalism are the two great pillars of the American idea.

To have rocked one of those pillars may be regarded as a misfortune.

To have damaged the reputation of both, at home and abroad, is a pretty stunning achievement for an American president.

Masterful. I really couldn’t have said it better myself.

The British Say It Best

Happy Hour Discurso

Today’s (late) opining on the public discourse.

Right, my darlings. I do apologize for abandoning you all for work and a liberal-minded coworker. Thankee kindly for allowing me to slack off on my duties.

I am back. I am informed. And now, let the smackdown begin.

Sarah Palin makes What Not to Wear green with envy over the green she lets the Republicon National Committee spend on her hair, makeup and clothes. She also seems to have a strange idea of how to go about “end[ing] the culture of self-dealing:”

She does seem to have a talent for getting other people to pay for things, though. And while I don’t mind when she charges the RNC, I might be a bit annoyed if I were a citizen of Alaska:

“Gov. Sarah Palin charged the state for her children to travel with her, including to events where they were not invited, and later amended expense reports to specify that they were on official business.

The charges included costs for hotel and commercial flights for three daughters to join Palin to watch their father in a snowmobile race, and a trip to New York, where the governor attended a five-hour conference and stayed with 17-year-old Bristol for five days and four nights in a luxury hotel.

In all, Palin has charged the state $21,012 for her three daughters’ 64 one-way and 12 round-trip commercial flights since she took office in December 2006. In some other cases, she has charged the state for hotel rooms for the girls.

Alaska law does not specifically address expenses for a governor’s children. The law allows for payment of expenses for anyone conducting official state business.

As governor, Palin justified having the state pay for the travel of her daughters — Bristol, 17; Willow, 14; and Piper, 7 — by noting on travel forms that the girls had been invited to attend or participate in events on the governor’s schedule.

But some organizers of these events said they were surprised when the Palin children showed up uninvited, or said they agreed to a request by the governor to allow the children to attend.”

Where I come from, when you say that your kids were invited and they weren’t, that’s called “lying.” And when you amend expense reports to say they were on official business when they weren’t, that’s called “falsifying documents.” No doubt that’s because I don’t come from Real America, and haven’t absorbed nearly enough of its timeless moral values.

I’ve noticed that Republicon ethics seem to follow these guidelines: Democrats must never ever engage in remotely questionable ethical behavior, but Republicons are free to indulge in the most flagrant of ethics violations as long as they’re a) robbing somebody blind and b) have a flimsy excuse handy.

They also have an incredibly hard time a) remembering the outlandish things they’ve said and done (probably because there are so many) and b) understanding that other people have longer memories and recording devices:

On Saturday, Republican North Carolina Reps. Patrick McHenry and Robin Hayes warmed up the crowd at a rally for Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) by throwing red meat to the right-wing audience. As ThinkProgress noted, the New York Observer’s Jason Horowitz reported that Hayes “accused Obama of ‘inciting class warfare’ and said that ‘liberals hate real Americans that work and achieve and believe in God.’”

Yesterday, the Politico’s Ryan Grim contacted Hayes’s spokeswoman, Amanda Little, who said that the congressman denied making the comments:

Hayes spokeswoman, Amanda Little, says that Hayes absolutely denies making the comments that appear in the Observer article. She noted that other national reporters were at the event and didn’t pick up on what the Observer reported. […]

Hayes spokeswoman Little is still denying it and accuses The Crypt of “irresponsible journalism.”

Horowitz stood behind his story, saying that the reason most national reporters didn’t cover the remarks is because they weren’t there; the national media’s plane hadn’t yet arrived. “I wasn’t on the plane,” explained Horowitz. “I don’t know if they were aware the national press wasn’t there, but they were staying stuff.”

Audio of the event recorded by Lisa Miller of WFAE in Charlotte, NC now definitively shows that Hayes has been lying about not saying that “liberals hate real Americans.”

It’s crystal clear audio, too. Have a listen:

Beyond priceless, isn’t he? That exaggerated hick accent, those loathsome views – a true man of the mob, that.

The whole sorry saga, including Hayes’s lame attempt to explain his way out after being caught in a blatant fucking lie, is at Politico, and it makes for some truly entertaining reading.

Poor memories abound in the Republicon party. I’m sure someone explained to Sarah Palin just what a Vice President does after her epic fail in July, but the lesson doesn’t seem to have been absorbed:

Yesterday, Gov. Sarah Palin (R-AK) sat for an interview with KUSA, an NBC affiliate in Colorado. In response to a question sent to the network by a third grader at a local elementary school about what the Vice President does, Palin erroneously argued that the Vice President is “in charge of the United States Senate“:

Q: Brandon Garcia wants to know, “What does the Vice President do?”

PALIN: That’s something that Piper would ask me! … [T]hey’re in charge of the U.S. Senate so if they want to they can really get in there with the senators and make a lot of good policy changes that will make life better for Brandon and his family and his classroom.

[snip]

Article I of the Constitution establishes an exceptionally limited role for t
he Vice President — giving the office holder a vote only when the Senate is “equally divided”:

The Vice President of the United States shall be President of the Senate, but shall have no vote, unless they be equally divided.

Moreover, the U.S. Senate website explains that the modern role of Vice Presidents has been to preside over the Senate “only on ceremonial occasions.” ThinkProgress contacted Senior Assistant Paliamentarian Peter Robinson, who also disputed Palin’s characterization of the Vice President’s role:

In modern practice the Vice President doesn’t really control the Senate. … If anyone has a responsibility to try to govern the Senate, it’s the responsibility of the two leaders.

Has anyone given this woman an MRI to see if she has a functioning brain? I’m afraid it’s only air in there. This, my darlings, is the person whom John McCain in his infinitesimal wisdom has decreed is ready to become our President if he should croak: a woman who doesn’t even know what the job is nearly two months after she was nominated for it.

No wonder so many conservatives are fleeing the Republicon party:

There have been more than a few “Obamacans” this year — the group of relatively high-profile Republicans and conservatives who, for a variety of reasons, are supporting Barack Obama. We’ve seen some from current and former lawmakers (Leach, Gilchrest, Chafee), some Republican officials (Powell, Kmiec), and some well known political observers (Buckley), and even some conservative scholars.

But it never would have occurred to me that Ken Adelman would throw his support to Obama.

Ken Adelman is a lifelong conservative Republican. Campaigned for Goldwater, was hired by Rumsfeld at the Office of Economic Opportunity under Nixon, was assistant to Defense Secretary Rumsfeld under Ford, served as Reagan’s director of arms control, and joined the Defense Policy Board for Rumsfeld’s second go-round at the Pentagon, in 2001. Adelman’s friendship with Rumsfeld, Cheney, and their wives goes back to the sixties, and he introduced Cheney to Paul Wolfowitz at a Washington brunch the day Reagan was sworn in.

In recent years, Adelman and his friends Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Wolfowitz fell out over his criticisms of the botching of the Iraq War. Still, he remains a bona-fide hawk (“not really a neo-con but a con-con”) who has never supported a Democrat for President in his life. Two weeks from now that’s going to change: Ken Adelman intends to vote for Barack Obama. He can hardly believe it himself.

Adelman told George Packer that he’s basing his decision largely on questions of “temperament” and “judgment.” As Adelman sees it, McCain faced a temperament test when the financial crisis began, and McCain failed under pressure, becoming “impetuous, inconsistent, and imprudent; ending up just plain weird.”

McCain’s judgment test came when choosing a running mate, Adelman argued, and he failed that one, too.

Funny. That’s what most of the others said, too.

And, finally, we come to the “reap what ye sow” portion of our program. I hope you’re as amused as I am:

Remember all of those right-wing 527s that were going overwhelm the political landscape? As it happens, the conservative financiers have lost a lot of money lately.

“After the [GOP] convention, things looked good,” said Phil Musser, a Republican fundraising consultant. “Major donors interested in issue advocacy were tuned in, political juices were flowing, polling looked good, and then, blammo! Most donors lost 20 or 30 percent of their net worth in eight days. With few exceptions, that pretty well shut down the money discussion for a lot of folks.”

Four years ago, groups operating outside the party structure invested more than $130 million in television commercials, often carrying the kind of negative messages that the candidates themselves wished to avoid. This year, total spending by such groups is at about $17 million so far, with no single organization playing a dominant role, according to Evan Tracey of the Campaign Media Analysis Group.

There were reports earlier this year, for example, that Freedom’s Watch was prepared to amass a quarter-billion dollar budget for the 2008 campaigns. Billionaire casino mogul Sheldon Adelson was expected to help bankroll the operation — that is, before he saw “$4 billion of his personal fortune evaporate as a result of the slumping national economy, and that was before the slow-motion stock market crash.”

Democrats, of course, aren’t feeling the pinch. They’re swimming in cash and cashing in on the failing economy, because the majority of Americans know it takes a Democrat to fix an economy the Republicons have fucked nearly to death. For once, there is poetic justice.

Feels soooo good.

Thanks to all who sent links whilst I was off gallivanting. There will be a special trip to the woodshed with the Smack-o-Matic in hand for your viewing pleasure – once I’ve had me nap.

Happy Hour Discurso

Obama's Grandmother Seriously Ill

Not good:

Democrat Barack Obama is cancelling nearly all his campaign events Thursday and Friday to fly to Hawaii to visit his suddenly ill 86-year-old grandmother.

Campaign spokesman Robert Gibbs told reporters Monday that Obama’s grandmother, Madelyn Payne Dunham, who helped raise him, was released from the hospital late last week. But he says her health has deteriorated to the point where her situation is very serious.

Gibbs said Obama would return to the campaign trail on Saturday, though he was unsure where.

Obama events originally planned for Madison, Wis., and Des Moines, Iowa, on Thursday will be replaced with one in Indianapolis before he makes the long flight to Hawaii.

I hope she rallies. I want her to see her grandson take the Oath of Office.

If you want to drop her a get well postcard, you can do so through the campaign:

Mrs. Madelyn Dunham
In care of: Obama for America
Honolulu Headquarters
1050 Ala Moana Blvd Ste D2690
Honolulu, HI 96814

Obama's Grandmother Seriously Ill

Some More Occasional Nuts

The key to a successful “occasional nut” defense is to a) ensure that the nuts don’t show up with alarming frequency and b) aren’t Congressmen taking the podium at your rallies:

On Saturday, Republican North Carolina Reps. Patrick McHenry and Robin Hayes warmed up the crowd at a rally for Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) by throwing red meat to the right-wing audience. McHenry called the event the “biggest crowd John McCain has gotten in North Carolina” and said that voters had a critical choice between McCain and Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) this election. Someone in the audience yelled out, “It’s like black and white” to loud laughter. McHenry let the remark pass.

When it was his turn to speak, Hayes accused liberals of hating “real Americans”:

He [McHenry] yielded the microphone to Representative Robin Hayes, who prefaced his comments by saying it was important to “make sure we don’t say something stupid, make sure we don’t say something we don’t mean.” Republicans, he reminded the crowd, were kind people. Plus, he added, the liberal media had shown itself eager to distort such remarks. With the crowd duly chastened and put on best behavior, he accused Obama of “inciting class warfare” and said that “liberals hate real Americans that work and achieve and believe in God.”

The jury has returned a verdict, Your Honor. “Occasional Nut” defense: Epic Fucking Fail.

Hayes’s attempt to “make sure we don’t say something stupid:” We’re going to need a phrase for “Epic Fucking Fail to the 10th power.”

At what point to we say that the vast majority of the Republicon party has gone beyond screwing pooches and jumping sharks and disqualify them from holding public office ever again?

Some More Occasional Nuts

Michelle Bachmann Hangs Self (Again)

Politico gave Rep. Michele “I Hates Libruls!” Bachmann a hammer, some nails, a pile of two-by-fours, and a few feet of rope – in other words, they let her yak. She proceeded to build her own gallows and took a flying leap with the rope around her neck.

It’s two pages of spectacular right-wing nuttery. When a Con gets a few talking points lodged in their skull, they can’t get them out with a crowbar and a blowtorch. One of those talking points is that it’s never the Con’s own fuckwittery to blame: it’s always those horrible librul special interests!

Last Friday, all the liberal special interests from California to Vermont found a new outlet for their energy, their frustrations and their money. That would be in defeating me.

I suppose we are indeed a “liberal special interest.” We are liberals, and we have a special interest in keeping batshit insane wingnuts from getting reelected.

She went on to whine that we know nothing about her policy views (au contraire), her opponent’s views (well, the fact he’s running against Rep. Bachmann speaks volumes, but strangely enough, so does his campaign site), and that we’re only riled up because of “a few minutes of listening to the political echo chamber” (no, Michele, this was just the final straw).

But that’s not the pièce de résistance of her mélange de folie. No. The best part is her blatant attempt to change reality:

Despite the way the blogs and the Democratic Party are spinning it, I never called all liberals anti-American, I never questioned Barack Obama’s patriotism, and I never asked for some House Un-American Activities Committee witch hunt into my colleagues in Congress.

Michele, I hate to break this to you, but there’s a video.

Let’s have a gander at the transcript, shall we? We’ll start with the anti-American bit:

MR. MATTHEWS: If you have liberal views, does that mean you have anti-American views? What’s the connection? I don’t get the connection. What’s the connection between liberal and leftist and anti-American?

REP. BACHMANN: Anti-American is the point, because —

MR. MATTHEWS: I mean, if you’re liberal, are you anti-American?

REP. BACHMANN: Well, the liberals that are Jeremiah Wright and that are Bill Ayers, they’re over-the-top anti-American. And that’s the question that Americans have. Remember, it was Michelle Obama who said she’s only recently proud of her country. And so these are very anti-American views.

[snip]

MR. MATTHEWS: Well, let me ask you this. This country is roughly divided now over the last — all our lifetimes between Republicans and Democrats and liberals and conservatives. Maybe 30 percent of the country, 30 to 40 percent, is conservative, and self- described — people tell you what they are — and 30-some percent are liberals. Do you think those 30 percent liberals are anti-American? The 30 percent of this country that calls itself liberals, are they anti-American?

REP. BACHMANN: I think the people that Barack Obama has been associating with are anti-American, by and large, the people who are radical leftists.[emphasis added]

Parsing your phrasing, Michele, you did indeed just call liberals anti-American. You don’t have to say the exact words, “Liberals are anti-American,” to say that liberals are anti-American. The entire thrust of your conversation was to call everyone who isn’t ultra-conservative “anti-American.” And although you tried to walk it back, give yourself some plausible deniability by pretending you were only talking about “radical leftists,” you made it pretty fucking clear that anyone not right of center is close enough to a “radical leftist” to qualify as “anti-American” in your estimation.

Moving on to questioning Barack Obama’s patriotism, we find that you did indeed do so. There’s the associates-with-anti-Americans schtick, and don’t fucking tell me that’s not questioning his patriotism, because we all know that “true patriots” don’t “associate with people who are anti-American.” Right? And then there’s this precious little exchange:

REP BACHMANN: I think that it’s important that the American people know that Barack Obama didn’t have a mild association with Bill Ayers. He had a very strong association with Bill Ayers. Bill Ayers is not someone that the average American wants to see their president have an association with.

MR. MATTHEWS: Why is it of concern? What is wrong with it? Tell me what it tells you about Barack Obama. Does it say he’s got a character problem? Does it say he has a problem with his patriotism? Just give me a term for it so we can put it in a category. Why do you care enough to bring this up at the end of this campaign? Why is it an important election eve issue?

REP. BACHMANN: I think it’s important, Chris, because —

MR. MATTHEWS: I mean, we’ve got a lot of problems in this country. Why is this so important that it’s being pushed out on telephone calls to all the key states now with two weeks to go?

REP. BACHMANN: It’s important because we look at the collection of friends that Barack Obama has had over his life, and usually we associate with people who have similar ideas to us. And it seems that it calls into question what Barack Obama’s true beliefs and values and thoughts are — his attitudes, values and beliefs with Jeremiah Wright on his view of the United States —

MR. MATTHEWS: Okay —

REP. BACHMANN: — which is negative; Bill Ayers, his negative view of the United States. We’ve seen one friend after another.

You want to tell me again you’re not questioning his patriotism? Bull. Fucking. Shit.

Now, what’s this about you not calling for a witch-hunt?

MR. MATTHEWS: Well, he’s a United States senator from Illinois. He’s one of the people you suspect as being anti-American. How many people in the Congress of the United States do you think are anti- American? You’ve already suspected Barack Obama. Is he alone, or are there others? How many do you suspect of your colleagues as being anti-American?

REP. BACHMANN: What I would say — what I would say is that the news media should do a penetrating expose and take a look. I wish they would. I wish the American media would take a great look at the views of the people in Congress and find out, are they pro-America or anti-America? I think people would love to see an expose like that.

Coup de fucking état.

Keep El’s new seat warm for him, and do remember to disinfect the office on your way out, you lying sack of shit.

(Tip o’ the shot glass to zizi at Daily Kos. And an extra shot for the exquisite contempt!)

Michelle Bachmann Hangs Self (Again)

Shall Be Updating the Blog Roll this Weekend

I realized yesterday that I haven’t updated the damned blog roll in months.

Since then, Science After Sunclipse moved to ScienceBlogs, I’ve become a Daily Kos addict, there are round about a dozen blogs that I’ve meant to put up there and haven’t, we have no link to the World’s Best Evah Roast Chicken recipe… in other words, it’s high damned time for an update.

Which is where you come in, my darlings.

A lot of you have wonderful blogs of your own. I stumble across them on Sitemeter, or by clicking through your profiles when you comment, and it’s past time you got your names on the cantina wall.

Links in Comments, please.

Shall Be Updating the Blog Roll this Weekend