A Valuable Synopsis of the U.S. Attorney Firings Scandal

On Monday, the Office of the Inspector General released a report on the politicized firings of several United States Attorneys by the Bush Regime. Talking Points Memo brings the whole sordid saga together in one easy-to-read, essential report. Some highlights:

Almost since the scandal broke early last year, there have been clear signs that the plan to fire U.S. attorneys as a means of advancing the Bush administration’s political goals was being driven by the White House. That impression has been strengthened as top current and former White House officials, including Karl Rove and Harriet Miers, have consistently stonewalled efforts to look into the matter.

[snip]

The White House’s active involvement in the firings, as depicted in the [OIG] report, can be divided into two broad categories: First, its role in initiating and promoting the overall plan to remove an unspecified number of U.S. attorneys — traditionally treated as apolitical prosecutors who operate independently from the political agenda of the administration — deemed insufficiently committed to the Bush agenda. And second, its apparent work in pushing specifically for several of the most high-profile dismissals.

[snip]

Kyle Sampson, Gonzales’ then chief of staff at DOJ, and the point man on the firing plan, told OIG investigators that, some time after the 2004 election, White House counsel Harriet Miers asked him whether the administration should try to get all 93 U.S. attorneys to resign, as part of a plan to replace all political appointees for the new term. Sampson said he argued against this idea.

[snip]

Still, the White House seems to have kept pressing. In January 2005, Sampson received an email from a Miers deputy, which said: “Karl Rove stopped by “to ask … ‘how we planned to proceed regarding US Attorneys, whether we are going to allow all to stay, request resignations from all and accept only some of them, or selectively replace them, etc.’ ” [Quotation marks rendered as in the report]. A few days later, Sampson replied: “If Karl [Rove] thinks there would be political will to do it, then so do I.”

The following month, Sampson told OIG, Miers followed up, asking him for a list of possible U.S. attorneys to get rid of. Sampson dutifully responded with his first list, which contained the names of four USAs who ultimately were axed, as well as ten who weren’t.

[snip]

The dismissal in which the White House played the greatest role was that of Bud Cummins, US Attorney for the Eastern District of Arkansas. Cummins, the report makes clear, was removed not because of shortcomings in his own record, either political or performance-based, but because the White House wanted to move a GOP political operative, Timothy Griffin, in to the job.

[snip]

The White House’s role in the firing of David Iglesias as U.S. attorney for the District of New Mexico appears to have been less direct than that of Cummins – but the report makes clear that it was involved nonetheless.

[snip]

At a November 15 White House meeting, Wilson put in another complaint to Rove about Iglesias. This time, he told her: “That decision has already been made. He’s gone.” But as the report notes, the first list from Sampson to include Iglesias’ name would not be sent to Miers until a few hours later. In other words, Rove’s knowledge that Iglesias was to be fired suggests this wasn’t a decision made solely by DOJ.

Read the whole thing. It paints a concise and terrifying picture of a White House determined to create an army of U.S. Attorneys slavishly loyal to them.

Law enforcement is too powerful and too essential to a civilized society to politicize. Police, attorneys and judges need to be loyal to the law, not partisian ideology. Democracy can’t survive when the long arm of the law is wielded by a political party.

We need to push for the truth in this, and we need to ensure that the partisan hacks who were installed during Bush’s rule are bunged out on their ears.

A Valuable Synopsis of the U.S. Attorney Firings Scandal
{advertisement}

Biden vs. Palin: a Preview

This video should tell you exactly who’s bringing the sizzle and who’s bringing the steak to tonight’s debates:


Biden can discuss Supreme Court decisions intelligently and in depth. Palin vomits forth a loosely-connected stream of platitudes, personal impressions, and smoke.

There is no contest here. Palin is not the droid you are looking for.

Biden vs. Palin: a Preview

Will Protest 4 Beer

The next time you see a group of young Americans holding up Republicon-supporting signs at a political event, you might want to ask them how much money was paid for their principled stand:

In hopes of organizing a robust demonstration for the vice presidential debate this Thursday in St. Louis, the pro-Iraq War (and ostensibly pro-McCain) organization, Vets for Freedom, is resorting to offering local college fraternities hundreds of dollars if their members come and hold signs.

In an email obtained by the Huffington Post, Vets for Freedom field staffer Laura Meyer offered a fraternity at St. Louis University a “sizable donation” – plus free lunch – if it could use their pledges to demonstrate outside the VP debate.

“I was emailing you today,” wrote Meyer, “because I am trying to find people who would be willing to hold up signs for a few hours in the afternoon this Thursday outside the VP debate site. It’s only for a few hours and you can gain a lot from it….”

Note to idiotic organizations: your political philosophy is bankrupt when you have to pay pledges to promote it.

Allow me to coin a slogan: America’s Right Wing: Making a Mockery of Democracy Since Their Inception.

Will Protest 4 Beer

Happy Hour Discurso

Today’s opining on the public discourse.

I’m sorry. I have to do it. The ongoing Palin disaster is increasingly incredible, and I haven’t the strength or the will to look away.

I should be talking about the Senate’s dubious decision to ram through a noxious bailout bill (ooo, let’s include tax cuts for the wealthy! That’ll help!). I should be talking about the new revelations in the attorney general firings (actually, I’ll get to that later). But we’re going to ease off and have some fun at Sarah Palin’s expense.

Yes, I am not ashamed to pluck the low-hanging fruit.

Remember how Palin said that big, bad Putin was encroaching on U.S. airspace, and that made her all kinds of expert in foreign policy? Heh, well, you’ll be astounded to learn this, but that’s completely and totally fucking wrong:

The McCain-Palin campaign recently clarified Gov. Sarah Palin’s (R-AK) remark from last week that “Putin rears his head and comes into the airspace of the United States of America.” The campaign told CBS News, “Russian incursions…inside the air defense identification zone have occurred.” But as the Associated Press reports today, no such incursions have occurred ‘in
recent years’:

The air defense identification zone, almost completely over water, extends 12-mile past the perimeter of the United States. … However, no Russian military planes have been flying even into that zone, said Maj. Allen Herritage, a spokesman for the Alaska region of the North American Aerospace Defense Command, at Elmendorf Air Force Base. “To be very clear, there has not been any incursion in U.S. airspace in recent years,” Herritage said.


At this point, I think two things are clear. One, the McCain campaign is a bunch of rank amateurs when it comes to foreign policy. Two, they are not capable of telling the truth. Ever. Not even a little bit.

In light of this, you’ll be interested to learn that McCain, the self-proclaimed leading expert in foreign policy, has a new foreign policy advisor. It is… Sarah Palin:

John McCain chatted with NPR this morning, and during the interview, the senator made a very odd remark about where he’s turned for foreign policy advice.

NPR: Given what you’ve said, senator, is there an occasion where you could imagine turning to Gov. Palin for advice in a foreign policy crisis?

McCain: I’ve turned to her advice many times in the past. I can’t imagine turning to Senator Obama or Senator Biden because they’ve been wrong. They were wrong about Iraq, wrong about Russia.


Obviously, this is silly. But more importantly, I don’t think McCain appreciates how much this undermines his own campaign’s message. For a year and a half, McCain, his aides, and his surrogates have insisted that McCain is an unrivaled expert when it comes to foreign policy and national security. It’s a bogus claim — McCain has been strikingly confused on international affairs throughout his campaign — but it’s been the principal selling point of McCain’s candidacy from the outset.

Talking to NPR, however, McCain tried out an entirely new line — he, the expert, turns to his novice running mate, who has no foreign policy experience at all, for advice. In fact, he’s already done so “many times.”


Excuse me? “Turned to her advice many times in the past”? What fucking past? What fucking advice? Is she the one who told you that Obama and Biden have been wrong about Iraq and Russia? If so, I’d stop fucking listening now. You see, Biden’s foreign policy chops are a huge part of what got him on the ticket to begin with, and Obama’s been so right on Iran that even Bush has had to step up and follow his lead. So, Johnny, if you wouldn’t trust them, but you’d trust Sarah “I Can See Russia From Here!” Palin, there is something dramatically wrong with you.

Oh, wait. We already knew that. Nevermind.

McCain is turning to advice from a woman who can’t even handle the media. Palin’s incoherence in interviews has become so pronounced that the campaign announced it wouldn’t allow any more “gotcha” journalism from those big meanies like Gibson and Couric. Now, they’re going to stick with friendlier territory:

The Charlie Gibson interview didn’t go well. The interviews with Katie Couric became legendary — and not in a good way.

So, what will the McCain campaign do to get Sarah Palin’s message out? There’s a new plan.

Sarah Palin’s interview Tuesday with conservative talker Hugh Hewitt gave the vice presidential candidate a chance to showcase elements of her life story and demonstrate some of the folksiness that’s been central to her political success.

It’s exactly the kind of interview that voters can expect to see from the governor in the coming weeks, according to a Palin adviser, who recognized that there is hunger in Republican circles and among the public at large to see a less-scripted, more authentic candidate. That means more comfortable settings like conservative talk radio, and fewer opportunities for Palin to stumble, as was the case with a pair of high-profile network interviews with ABC and CBS.

“We’re going to be continue to put her in settings where she has an opportunity to shine, to be on offense,” the adviser said. “We’ve gotten very good feedback from the public from Hugh Hewitt interview.”

Ah, yes, the Hewitt interview. Hewitt, for those of you unfamiliar with his work, is a prominent Republican blogger and talk-show hos
t. Andrew Sullivan recently
named an award after him: “The Hewitt Award — named after the absurd partisan fanatic, Hugh Hewitt, is given for the
most egregious attempts to label Barack Obama as un-American, alien, treasonous, and far out of the mainstream of American life and politics.”


That’s right. When you can’t face up to the real(ish) journalists, run to the loving arms of the cons. That’s showing some real confidence in your ability to face opposition. Riiight.

And, just so’s you know, Sarah “Pit Bull” Palin doesn’t need no stinking coaches:

On Monday, Sarah Palin told Katie Couric that voters are going to have to decide between “new energy” and “new ideas” on one side, or “many, many years in the Senate” on
the other. Obama vs. McCain? No, she was talking about Palin vs. Biden, seemingly unaware of the dynamic at the top of the ticket.

CBS just sent out a transcript from this morning’s “Early Show,” in which Palin touched on a very similar theme.

COURIC: I know you’re heading to Sedona to work on your debate. What is your coach advising you?

PALIN: I don’t have a debate coach.

COURIC: Well, what are your coaches?

PALIN: I have quite a few people who are giving us information about the record of Obama and Biden, and at the end of the day, though, it is — it’s so clear, again, what those choices are. Either new ideas, new energy and reform of Washington, DC, or more of the same.


First, if she doesn’t have debate coaches, I’m the Heavyweight Champion of the World.

Second, and more importantly, Palin seems strikingly unaware of what this campaign is all about. As she sees it, John McCain represents “new ideas” and “new energy,” while Barack Obama represents “more of the same.”


Someone had better get Palin some coaches stat. Because she can’t answer simple interview questions, and she has no fucking clue she’s parroting Obama’s lines about McCain.

What a total fuckwit. She makes me ashamed to possess two X chromosomes.

Happy Hour Discurso

Pour That Man the Best Drink in the Cantina

Richard from the Panda’s Thumb earned my undying affection long ago. He works his ass off keeping us up on the antics of the anti-science crowd, and he did me the great honor of agreeing to be one of my Wise Readers in the event I actually get away from political bullshit long enough to actually write a story. (Which will happen just as soon as Obama and the Dems sink this rim shot, I swear it.)

Now, he’s earned himself a lifetime of free drinks:

A Way With Words

Apropos of practically nothing normally on PT, I really like Dana Hunter’s way with words

*blush*

Muchos gracias, mi amigo.

This goes for all of you, my darlings: I will never be able to express all of you mean to me. You’re my light in dark places. And you do outstanding work making this world a better place. You’re very much appreciated.

Never forget that.

Pour That Man the Best Drink in the Cantina

Couric Plays Pin the Question on the Politician

You know how the McCain campaign keeps reminding me of a circus? Now picture a clown being chased around the ring by someone trying to beat them with a bladder, and you have a good approximation of Katie Couric’s latest interview with Sarah Palin:

Global warming: Couric asked Palin if she believes global warming is the result of human activity. Palin dodged the question, talking about having formed “a sub-cabinet” to focus on climate change in Alaska. Couric asked again. Palin responded, “You know there are, there are man’s activities that can be contributed to the issues that we’re dealing with now, these impacts. I’m not going to solely blame all of man’s activities on changes in climate. Because the world’s weather patterns are cyclical.”

Abortion: Couric asked, “If a 15-year-old is raped by her father, do you believe it should be illegal for her to get an abortion, and why?” Palin dodged, explaining that she’s “pro-life,” and wants to help “women who find themselves in circumstances that are absolutely less than ideal.” Couric asked again. Palin dodged again, before saying she’s uncomfortable with sending a woman to jail for having an abortion. “That’s nothing I would ever support,” she said.

Contraception: Since Palin mentioned reducing the number of abortions, Couric asked about the morning-after pill. Palin dodged. Couric asked again, and Palin dodged again. Couric asked a third time, and Palin would only say, “[P]ersonally, I would not choose to participate in that kind of contraception.”

Homosexuality: Couric asked about her church sponsoring a conference about making gay people straight through prayer. Palin said she didn’t know if prayer could change a person’s sexual orientation, adding, “I have one of my absolute best friends for the last 30 years happens to be gay, and I love her dearly. And she is not my ‘gay friend,’ she is one of my best friends, who happens to have made a choice that isn’t a choice I would have made.” (In other words, Palin believes sexual orientation is a “choice” people make?)

I’m sure Katie’s getting sick of repeating herself by now. You can tell from her expression that she feels like she’s trying to elicit a clear answer from a particularly dense toddler.

All of this dodging and weaving tells me something. Sarah Palin knows how noxious her ideas and beliefs are to mainstream Americans. And she’s too fucking greenhorn to know how to give an answer that sounds like an answer that doesn’t actually answer the question, but keeps the pol from looking like an absolute moron. That combination in the White House would lead to untold amounts of pain for any thinking person in this country.

And by thinking, I mean any person with the brain capacity to form one single coherent thought per day.

Will someone please convince this disaster to go back to Alaska and leave us in peace? She’s a national joke. Why wouldn’t she want to go home where she’s liked and wanted?

As the Anchorage Daily News wrote in a blistering op-ed over the weekend: “Is it too much to ask that Alaska’s governor speak for herself, directly to Alaskans, about her actions as Alaska’s governor?” One longtime observer – a Palin fan who says she’s done “brilliant” things in the state – worried aloud to me over coffee in downtown Anchorage that allowing the McCain campaign to antagonize both parties in the legislature on Palin’s behalf could even lead to her eventual impeachment, if her bid to become Vice President fails and she returns to the state with a little less political luster.

Oh. Right. Well, never mind, then.

Couric Plays Pin the Question on the Politician

McCain: Aspiring Dictator

McCain tells the Des Moines Register what he thinks of the failed economic bailout bill and gives his game away:

“This is just, uh, an unacceptable situation. I’m not saying this is the perfect answer. If I were a dictator, which I always aspire to be, I would write it very differently…”

He surely didn’t look like a man who’s joking. If you have any friends, family, colleagues, etc. who are leaning McCain’s way, you might want to ask them how they feel about living in a dictatorship. And considering how old McCain is, and who’s been picked to succeed him, we’d soon be living in a Dominionist theocracy.

Be warned.

McCain: Aspiring Dictator

Faux News Impervious to Reality's Bitch-Slap

It takes a special sort of (for want of a better word) mind to be confronted with clear, unequivocal reality, and promptly make up your own:

Thankfully, the Faux News team is full of such (for want of a better word) minds.

If any of you can’t watch videos online (pity), what you would have witnessed is this: Faux News “reporter” asks folks in a diner who’s voting for McCain. Only the “reporter” raises his hand. Upon being asked who’s voting for Obama, every hand except for the reporter’s goes up. “Reporter” declares a split decision and announces that this is why Pennsylvania’s a battleground state.


If this is what battleground states are going to look like this November, I think I can stop worrying about the election now.

Faux News Impervious to Reality's Bitch-Slap