Stop and Frisk Comes to Florida »« The 2014 Rock Hall of Fame Inductions

The Least Surprising Anti-Choice Move Ever

Over the last four years, anti-choice Republicans have passed more than 200 laws against reproductive rights at the state level. Most of those are in the form of TRAP (Targeted Regulation of Abortion Provider) laws, one of the common features of which is a requirement that any doctor performing abortions have admitting privileges at a local hospital. So what are they doing now? Protesting hospitals to get them to deny admitting privileges to those doctors, of course, as my friend Robin Marty writes.

In Texas, where the state’s endangered clinics are struggling to stay open, the anti-abortion organization Life Dynamics has put together a campaign notifying hospitals that offering admitting privileges to any abortion-providing doctors could be bad for them in some mysterious, unnamed way.

The letters addressed to every hospital in the state don’t specify what exactly the facilities will experience if they do provide access for a doctor. But there are a number of different ways to target a hospital in order to cut off access to legal abortion. Other examples from around the country make it clear that these institutions may experience protests, picketing, and outright harassment of their medical staff and their executives.

For instance, a small group of anti-choice activists in Alabama made it their mission to take on Crestwood Medical Center for offering admitting privileges to one abortion provider in the Huntsville area. In a letter, abortion opponents referred to the hospital as “the ‘lifeline’ enabling the local abortion business to operate,” and promised a protest on hospital grounds. The hospital itself was unmoved, responding in a statement, “We do not intend to — nor can we legally — revoke the medical staff privileges of any trained, licensed, lawful and duly credentialed physician for issues that have no bearing on his or her work or practice at the hospital.”

In Ohio, anti-abortion activists tucked legislation into the state’s yearly budget to make it more difficult for clinics to remain open. The new law requires transfer agreements with nearby hospitals, and even limits which hospitals can offer those privileges by forbidding any institution that receives public funds from entering into an agreement with a local abortion provider. Now, that legislation could have a rippling effect, as pro-life action groups in the state seek to draw attention to hospitals that use abortion clinics to train doctors in full spectrum reproductive health care.

“What kind of logic by University Hospitals can justify training abortionists at Preterm to kill children whose only sin is that their earthly presence will be “inconvenient” while trying to save children of the same gestational age born prematurely at Rainbow Babies and Children Hospital?” demands Lake County Right to Life, a local anti-choice group in Ohio, which has urged its supporters to call the hospital’s Chief Executive Officer and Board Members and demand an end to their “participation in child killing.”

Together, Lake Country Right to Life and Cleveland Right to Life also organized a “prayerful witness” at the main campus of the hospital to protest the “five notorious local abortionists… listed on the teaching faculty of UH.”
The hospital doesn’t even need to be in the same state to be a target. An abortion opponent and pastor from Wisconsin has begun a campaign against the Mayo Clinic Health System in Rochester, Minnesota, demanding the hospital fire a doctor whom he feels didn’t provide adequate care for his wife during a high-risk pregnancy. He claims that the doctor doesn’t value “life” because he might be providing abortions for pregnancy complications at a different hospital — and the protests are taking place at the Franciscan-Mayo in Lacrosse, Wisconsin, despite the fact that no abortions are being performed there.

They justified these regulations on the grounds of protecting the health of the woman, but that was clearly a lie. As with everything they do, the only goal they care about is stopping women from being able to control their own reproduction.

Comments

  1. D. C. Sessions says

    The biggest giveaway is the part where the clinic has to have admitting privileges, but the hospital is punished for granting them. There’s no way to spin that as being a health and safety measure, which puts the “admitting privileges” part in its proper context too.

    I don’t see that combination standing up in court until the SCOTUS reverses Roe v Wade.

  2. says

    Ohio, you make me sick.

    As to protests, vote with your wallet, so to speak. When you need emergency medical care, go right ahead and demand transportation to a hospital that isn’t in the “abortions network”. Enjoy.

  3. sh3baproject says

    @2 i sometimes go to ohio to visit my uncle. its not as bad as one thinks, but yea, has a lot of wingnuts.

  4. says

    As with everything they do, the only goal they care about is stopping women from being able to control their own reproduction.

    LIES!! US PROLIFE PROFAMILY PROJESUS AMERICANS ARENT STOPPING WOMEN FROM CONTROLING THEIR OWN REPRODUCTION!! THEY CAN CONTROL THEIR OWN REPRODUCTION ALL THEY WANT!! THE PROBLEM IS THAT THEY DONT!!! THEN WE HAVE TO STEP IN TO SAVE THEM FROM AVOIDING THE CONSEQUENSES OF THEIR WHORING AND SLUTTERY!!!

  5. says

    They justified these regulations on the grounds of protecting the health of the woman, but that was clearly a lie.

    So is being the party of less regulation.

  6. dianne says

    There are chronic physician shortages in the south, particularly the Mississippi delta, and the midwest/west, worst in areas with TRAP laws. Almost as if physicians aren’t too keen on working in places where terrorists regularly bomb clinics and threaten hospitals. Not to mention that quite a lot of physicians are women who aren’t anxious to live in a place that would rather let them die of pregnancy related complications than allow them to have an abortion. No, that’s not the whole story of why there are shortages, but it’s definitely a consideration, at least anecdotally, based on conversations I’ve had with people about where they’re applying for jobs.

  7. Pierce R. Butler says

    … outright harassment of their medical staff and their executives.

    Any patients who get caught up in this by, say, trying to go through the entrance, count as collateral damage (i.e., they don’t count).

  8. michaelraymer says

    I happen to live in La Crosse, WI, and I have seen protesters at the Mayo Clinic here. I saw two people holding signs, but I was only able to read one of them. It said “ABORTIONISTS WORK HERE” – as if that should somehow make everyone flee in horror.

  9. coffeehound says

    … outright harassment of their medical staff and their executives.

    On the plus side however, being Christians and all they’ll never subject them to boycotts and uncivil discourse like all those evil, radical Nazi liberals. Just clinic bombings, harassment and murder threats.

  10. velociraptor says

    Has anyone thought of armed volunteers escorting women to clinics in ‘open carry’ states? It’s not as if there is no precedence of ‘Christian’ violence towards doctors and clinics.

Leave a Reply