Too Extreme for the Worldnetdaily?


Is it really possible to be too far to the right for the Worldnetdaily? Apparently so, according to racist Peter Brimelow. He writes on white supremacist site VDARE that he wrote an anti-immigration column that WND rejected for being too extreme. Right Wing Watch has the excerpts:

The difficulty in the immigration debate is what I called in Alien Nation back in 1995 “Hitler’s Revenge.” The elites of the West emerged from WWII utterly traumatized by the experience of confronting Nazism. It was so traumatic that they went overboard on the opposite side. They became convinced that any discussion of ethnicity or cultural heritage at all, let alone race, was unthinkable. You couldn’t address these things without being a Nazi…

My personal view is that the counter to the charge of racism is the charge of treason. What these people are doing is treason: they intend to destroy the historic American nation as it had evolved to 1965.

However, I wrote a column a couple of weeks ago saying this which was rejected as too extreme by WND — a considerable feat!

Yes, it certainly is. Especially since, as RWW points out, there was nothing in that column that hasn’t been said by other columnists at WND many times over. Accusing liberals of treason? That’s a daily staple at WND. And they’ve published Brimelow’s columns before.

Comments

  1. says

    And they’ve published Brimelow’s columns before.

    This is completely different. This time, he wouldn’t give them a cut of whatever book he’s pushing.

  2. blf says

    I image suggesting ACA is a good thing, AGW is real and extremely serious, Muslims are human beings and almost none are terrorists, President Obama is not Kenyan, and so on, are all “too extreme” for Wacko Nutters’s Delusions.

    Reality itself is too extreme!

  3. John Pieret says

    they intend to destroy the historic American nation

    I’m sure the Native Americans will be happy to accept your support in ridding the country of the hoardes of illegal immagrents that have plagued them.

    as it had evolved to 1965

    Gee, I wonder why he chose that particular date to define the “historic American nation”?

  4. dogmeat says

    I’ve been advocating a repeal of these idiotic immigration laws and implementing the sane immigration laws circa 1491.

  5. alanb says

    The elites of the West emerged from WWII … convinced that any discussion of ethnicity or cultural heritage at all, let alone race, was unthinkable. You couldn’t address these things without being a Nazi…

    It’s true. After April 1945 nobody spoke of race ever again.

  6. busterggi says

    When one of these guys starts demanding the deportation of the First Nations peoples to their home country let me know – its about the only thing they haven’t demanded.

  7. says

    Damn that Hitler. He’s made it totally unfashionable to be a racist. And it’s not like there was anything he did to justify that either.

  8. freehand says

    Sounds like this bottom feeder wants to destroy the historic America as it has evolved to in 2013. Treason!*

    * Not treason, but still despicable.**

    ** Also, that sentence structure is a treasonous assault on the King’s English.

  9. aluchko says

    The obvious problem isn’t anything he said about race or treason, it’s Hitler. Even WND realizes that acknowledging that your arguments are unpopular because they were used by Nazi’s is a bad idea.

Leave a Reply