CIA Helped Iraq Use Chemical Weapons Against Iran


This has been the worst kept secret for a long time, but Foreign Policy now has documents from the CIA that prove that the U.S. government helped Iraq use chemical weapons against Iran in attacks that dwarf anything that the Syrian government has done against the rebels there.

In 1988, during the waning days of Iraq’s war with Iran, the United States learned through satellite imagery that Iran was about to gain a major strategic advantage by exploiting a hole in Iraqi defenses. U.S. intelligence officials conveyed the location of the Iranian troops to Iraq, fully aware that Hussein’s military would attack with chemical weapons, including sarin, a lethal nerve agent.

The intelligence included imagery and maps about Iranian troop movements, as well as the locations of Iranian logistics facilities and details about Iranian air defenses. The Iraqis used mustard gas and sarin prior to four major offensives in early 1988 that relied on U.S. satellite imagery, maps, and other intelligence. These attacks helped to tilt the war in Iraq’s favor and bring Iran to the negotiating table, and they ensured that the Reagan administration’s long-standing policy of securing an Iraqi victory would succeed. But they were also the last in a series of chemical strikes stretching back several years that the Reagan administration knew about and didn’t disclose…

According to recently declassified CIA documents and interviews with former intelligence officials like Francona, the U.S. had firm evidence of Iraqi chemical attacks beginning in 1983. At the time, Iran was publicly alleging that illegal chemical attacks were carried out on its forces, and was building a case to present to the United Nations. But it lacked the evidence implicating Iraq, much of which was contained in top secret reports and memoranda sent to the most senior intelligence officials in the U.S. government. The CIA declined to comment for this story.

Just as important, our government also engaged in a very public propaganda campaign to blame Iran for those attacks, knowing full well that they were the victims rather than the ones responsible. This is just one more piece of evidence for the conclusion that we should always treat the things our government says with great skepticism. They lie, to us and the rest of the world, a lot.

Comments

  1. says

    And then, when it came time to justify an invasion of Iraq to overthrow its government, suddenly it was Iraq who had been lobbing the chemical WMDs. Never mind that he got them from the United States, he shouldn’t have used them!

  2. says

    They lie, to us and the rest of the world, a lot.

    Because democracy sometimes needs to be utterly subverted, in order to be protected. Or something.

  3. dean says

    U.S. intelligence officials conveyed the location of the Iranian troops to Iraq, fully aware that Hussein’s military would attack with chemical weapons, including sarin, a lethal nerve agent.

    We’ve known for some time that Reagan’s administration gave information about Iranian troop position to Iraq: is the new revelation that Reagan also knew the response would involve nerve agents?

  4. Skip White says

    And then, when it came time to justify an invasion of Iraq to overthrow its government, suddenly it was Iraq who had been lobbing the chemical WMDs. Never mind that he got them from the United States, he shouldn’t have used them!

    Reminds me of the bit Bill Hicks did around the time of the Persian Gulf War, where he basically said we know Iraq has incredible weapons because we looked at the receipt.

Leave a Reply