NOM Spokesperson Wants People Jailed for Buying Sperm »« Lively: Gay Wedding Songs Caused Noah’s Flood

Gaffney: Hagel Acts Like Iranian Agent

While most of the neo-cons lose their minds over the nomination of Chuck Hagel to be the secretary of defense, arguing that he does not sufficiently genuflect to the leaders of Israel, the loony Frank Gaffney goes a step further and claims that Hagel acts like an agent of Iran:

Mefferd: Obviously people have been talking about Chuck Hagel and his anti-Israel position; he also has a lot of interest in disarming us, doesn’t he?

Gaffney: He is a man who served in the military with distinction in Vietnam, by virtue of that I think many, including veterans groups, have been inclined to think he’ll be a formidable ally of the men and women in uniform. I think that’s anything but the case. To be frank about it, a guy who believes that you can further eviscerate the funding for the Defense Department suggests to me he’s a guy who cannot be all that concerned about the men and women in uniform because it ensures that they will not have the wherewithal that they require to protect us. That’s obviously not good for us but it isn’t going to be very safe or healthy for them either as they go into war without that kit.

Mefferd: Right and you would think that Iran getting excited about Chuck Hagel’s nomination would tip off a few people that this is probably not in the best interest of the United States to have Chuck Hagel in this job.

Gaffney: He’s earned the support of the Iranian regime. I have to say, over many years he has shilled for them it seems at just about every turn. He has objected to sanctions, I guess there have been one or two votes where he played along with it, but mostly he’s been objecting to it certainly since he left the Senate. He has categorically rejected the idea that we might have to use military force to prevent the sort of threat that I believe is now imminent in terms of a nuclear armed Iran. He has been exceedingly aggressive in promoting the idea that we need to engage with them on essentially whatever terms they demand. In other words, you couldn’t find a guy who has been more active in terms of promoting the interests of Iran at the expense of the United States than Chuck Hagel other than somebody who is actually an Iranian agent. I’m not suggesting that he is, I don’t know, but I certainly think that’s the point of comparison here because it’s almost that full-throated.

Gaffney is the very embodiment of what Orwell feared, someone who claims that black is white and up is down. This is the guy who testified in Tennessee that Islam is not a religion so it doesn’t deserve First Amendment protection.

Comments

  1. slc1 says

    Among other things, Gaffney completely distorts Hagel’s position on sanctions against Iran. Hagel supports and has always supported multilateral sanctions on Iran. He opposed unilateral sanctions on Iran by the US because he felt that they would be ineffective.

    By the way, neocon Jennifer Rubin in today’s Washington Post, opens up a new front in the anti Hagel assault, namely that he’s soft on the Castro regime in Cuba.

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2013/01/14/how-would-they-justify-a-vote-for-hagel/

  2. says

    You couldn’t find anyone who more resembles a human turd than Frank Gaffney. I’m not suggesting that he is, I don’t know, but I certainly think that’s the point of comparison here because it’s almost that full-anused.

  3. says

    To be frank about it, a guy who believes that you can further eviscerate the funding for the Defense Department suggests to me he’s a guy who cannot be all that concerned about the men and women in uniform because it ensures that they will not have the wherewithal that they require to protect us.

    That’s what I’ve been saying about Republican tax-cutters since 1980. It’s about time people like Gaffney started realizing Republicans can’t be trusted to support our troops.

  4. slc1 says

    My suspicion is that Krauthammer, Gaffney, and Rubin would find something bad to say about Obama if he appointed Benjamin Netanyahu as his Secretary of Defense.

  5. Michael Heath says

    Here’s an interesting interview between the NYTs and Shimon Peres. The article covers the interplay between the U.S., President Obama, Iran, Netanyahu, and Peres from President Peres’ perspective: http://goo.gl/RgbyL

  6. John Hinkle says

    That’s obviously not good for us but it isn’t going to be very safe or healthy for [the troops] either as they go into war without that kit.

    Not to mention the kaboodle.

    I guess it’s just beyond Gaffney’s ken that the DoD has, you know, different items in its budget. The troops could have all the “kits” they want if we jettisoned some of our over priced, unneeded weapons programs or technologies.

  7. says

    slc1 “My suspicion is that Krauthammer, Gaffney, and Rubin would find something bad to say about Obama if he appointed Benjamin Netanyahu as his Secretary of Defense.”
    Foxnews post (accompanied by pictures of Hitler and Stalin):

    Obama to appoint foreigner to SecState!

    Drudge post (accompanied by pictures of Hitler and Stalin):

    New “Secretary” of “State” to bring back draft?

    WND/Moonbattery/etc post (accompanied by pictures of Hitler and Stalin):

    Kike Appointee proves Obama’s anti-Semitism

  8. says

    This is the guy who testified in Tennessee that Islam is not a religion so it doesn’t deserve First Amendment protection.

    Who in the living hell invited Frank Gaffney to testify in front anything? Please tell me it was a subcommittee of the state legislature, which is bad enough as it is, and not an actual court of law.

Leave a Reply