The Supreme Court on Monday released the schedule for oral argument on upcoming cases, including the two marriage equality cases. The court will hear argument on Hollingsworth v Perry, the case involving California’s Prop 8, on March 26, and United States v Windsor, the DOMA case, on March 27. Lyle Denniston at SCOTUSBlog notes that while the court did not explicitly say that the time for those arguments will be more than the usual one hour (30 minutes for each side, “the fact that each is to be heard alone will allow the argument time to be expanded, and that appears likely.”
Jan 11 2013
SCOTUS Sets Oral Arguments for Marriage Equality Cases
This post has no tag
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
About the Author
Freethought Blogs
- A Citizen of Earth
- A Million Gods
- Ace of Clades
- Alethian Worldview
- Almost Diamonds
- Ashley Miller
- Biodork
- Black Skeptics
- Blag Hag
- Brute Reason
- Butterflies and Wheels
- Comradde PhysioProffe
- Dispatches from the Culture Wars
- En Tequila Es Verdad
- Greta Christina's Blog
- Heteronormative Patriarchy for Men
- Lousy Canuck
- Mano Singham
- Maryam Namazie
- Near-Earth Object
- No Country for Women
- NonStampCollector
- Pharyngula
- Reasonable Doubts
- Richard Carrier Blogs
- Rock Beyond Belief
- Sincerely, Natalie Reed
- The Atheist Experience
- The Crommunist Manifesto
- The Digital Cuttlefish
- The Zingularity
- This Week in Christian Nationalism
- Token Skeptic
- YEMMYnisting
- Zinnia Jones
PostsCommentsArchives
Recent Posts
- Pat Robertson on Adultery
- Principal Still Punishing Katelyn Campbell
- Jesus vs Voodoo in North Miami Mayoral Race
- Another Brave Student Speaks Out
- Humanist Weddings Controversial in Britain
- Why is Obama Going After AP So Hard?
- The Lumpkin Prayer Case Gets Worse
- Judge Endorses Heckler’s Veto
- Ray Comfort Teaches How to Proselytize
- The Disturbing Story of Kamran Rizvi
Recent Comments
- cactuswren on Principal Still Punishing Katelyn Campbell
- f1tz on Humanist Weddings Controversial in Britain
- tumblr backups on Discrimination and the Salvation Army
- mildlymagnificent on Humanist Weddings Controversial in Britain
- iangould on The Disturbing Story of Kamran Rizvi
FTB RecentFTB Active
FTB Recent
- Mere atheism by PZ Myers
- Interim post in flight by Ophelia Benson
- Taking it Personally: Privilege and Women in Secularism by Ashley F. Miller
- [guest post] Hello from a Severely Disenchanted Former Democrat by Miri, Professional Fun-Ruiner
- Film review: War on Whistleblowers by Mano Singham
- Let's put scandals & austerity in crystal clear context by Stephen "DarkSyde" Andrew
FTB Active
- Open letter to Corey Keplinger by Russell Glasser
- I think we call that an own goal by PZ Myers
- Is misandry simply misogyny in disguise? by Ally Fogg
- "But I'm a man and I don't feel like I have any privilege." by Miri, Professional Fun-Ruiner
- More documenting the harassment by Ophelia Benson
- Leave Dan Brown Alone! by Ed Brayton

4 comments
Skip to comment form ↓
A. Noyd
January 11, 2013 at 10:42 am (UTC -4) Link to this comment
How much time will the anti-equality side really need to say, “Gay sex is icky, lots of people agree, god is on our side, think of the children, and marriage has been one man/one woman forever, therefore it’s our moral obligation to uphold discrimination”? Oh, right, they need lots of time to cover up how their “arguments” are nothing more than ignorant, nonsensical, bigoted bullshit.
Gretchen
January 11, 2013 at 11:18 am (UTC -4) Link to this comment
Okay, that’s plenty of time to figure out how we can watch them.
We….can watch them, right? Somehow?
whheydt
January 11, 2013 at 1:30 pm (UTC -4) Link to this comment
And the day after the oral arguments, there will be endless articles attempting to answer the question, “What the Hell did Justice X mean when he asked question Y?”
Gretchen
January 11, 2013 at 4:48 pm (UTC -4) Link to this comment
True, whheydt…which is a big part of why I’d so much prefer to be able to watch and hear it myself, as opposed to simply reading a transcript.