I was reading the latest screed by Bradlee Dean in the Worldnutdaily and I was struck not only by the absurdity of his ideas but by how badly he writes. He writes like a typical high school student, using words he doesn’t understand and odd sentences to try to sound more intelligent than he is. To wit:
If the SPLC cannot force schools through totalitarian means to accept its “Mix It Up at Lunch Day,” then it will defend Obama’s hand-picked, degenerate, radical homosexual Dan Savage, founder of the It Gets Better Project. A man who touts around under the guise of “anti-bullying,” and who earlier this year assailed high school students who take a biblical stance on homosexuality at a high school journalism conference.
A man who touts around? I don’t think he knows what that word means. Do they not have editors at WND? Was there no one to read a draft and ask him what the hell that could possibly mean? And the last sentence is actually a sentence fragment.
As you know, the socialist-communist agenda has always had a problem with how to defend and promote an indefensible agenda, dedicating themselves by covertly undermining and ultimately destroying American society as to implementing socialism/communism.
That’s just a big hot mess. What is the “as to” doing in there? And what does it mean? This is the kind of writing that gives English teachers ulcers.