Quantcast

«

»

May 16 2012

USCIRF Criticizes Kuwait’s New Blasphemy Bill

The US Commission on International Religious Freedom issued a statement strongly criticizing a bill passed by the Kuwaiti Parliament that would make blasphemy punishable by imprisonment and sometimes death. The Kuwaiti Emir has not yet approved the policy and the USCIRF is urging him not to do so:

The U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) today expressed grave concern over the Kuwaiti Parliament’s approval last week of severe new penalties for blasphemy. The Emir of Kuwait has 30 days to approve these penalties before they would become law. The new provisions would impose the death penalty on Muslims who refuse to repent after being found to have insulted God, the Prophet Mohammad, his wives, or the Qur’an. For non-Muslims, the punishment would be up to 10 years in prison; for Muslims who repent, the punishment would be up to five years or a fine.

“These penalties are alarming and contrary to international human rights standards. It is particularly regrettable that a strong ally of the United States and a member of the UN Human Rights Council has taken these steps,” said Leonard Leo, USCIRF Chair. “The Kuwaiti parliament’s approval is especially unfortunate in light of the new consensus resolutions at the Human Rights Council – adopted in both 2011 and 2012 — that focus on fighting religious intolerance, discrimination, and violence without restricting speech.”

USCIRF urges the United States to work with Kuwait to address concerns about intolerant speech through counter-speech and positive measures, including education and outreach, as provided for in Human Rights Council Resolution 16/18. The U.S. government also should urge the Emir of Kuwait to reject the pending blasphemy law amendments and focus instead on criminalizing only incitement to imminent violence. Such a reform would make Kuwaiti law consistent with international human rights standards and the intolerance resolutions that Kuwait supported at the UN.

“These draconian provisions should be rejected because they would place individuals’ lives in jeopardy for exercising their internationally-guaranteed freedoms of religion and expression,” said Leo. “As has been evident during the years USCIRF has monitored religious freedom violations around the world, blasphemy laws do not promote religious harmony as their proponents assert; rather, they exacerbate religious intolerance, extremism, and violence.”

Yes, a nation on the UN Human Rights Council is proposing to kill people for blasphemy. Of course, we have our own problems in that regard given our flagrant violation of human rights over the last decade. Okay, over the last two centuries, but you get my point. Still, this law is barbaric and disgusting and the USCIRF is right to speak out against it.

5 comments

Skip to comment form

  1. 1
    Gregory in Seattle

    Fuck Muhammad, his nine year old wife, and the dogs they rode in on.

  2. 2
    Doug Little

    So if this goes through are they going to remove them from the UN Human Rights Council? I fucking hope so.

  3. 3
    Nick Gotts

    Gregory in Seattle@1,

    That seems a trifle inconsistent. Wouldn’t that 9 year old wife be a victim of child abuse? Isn’t that something we’re supposed to be against? Yet you express the intention of fucking her.

  4. 4
    Gregory in Seattle

    “…after being found to have insulted God, the Prophet Mohammad, his wives, or the Qur’an.”

    Just trying to cover my bases.

  5. 5
    Crudely Wrott

    The U.S. government also should urge the Emir of Kuwait to reject the pending blasphemy law amendments and focus instead on criminalizing only incitement to imminent violence.

    Not practical. It would mean locking a majority of the Kuwaiti population.

    Upon reflection, the affect might not be much different here in America, I’m sad to realize.

Leave a Reply

Switch to our mobile site