More Death Threats for Challenging Christian Hegemony »« The ‘Smallest Military in Decades’ Lie

George Romney Taught How to Change Positions

Mitt Romney has become famous for flip flopping on everything other than his hair style, but his father, former Michigan Gov. George Romney, flipped on something big — Vietnam. But as Rolling Stone explains, there is a big difference in how he handled it versus how Mitt handles things. He explained exactly why he changed positions, saying that the military and diplomatic officers had lied to him about the situation in Vietnam and coming out strongly against the war. And unlike his son, that was not a politically convenient position to take. In fact, it killed his chances of becoming president.

His calling card was his shocking authenticity; his courage in sticking to his positions without fear or favor was extraordinary. In January of 1964, for example, the second-year governor received a letter (downloadable here) from a member of the top Mormon governing body reminding him of the “teachings of the prophet Joseph Smith” that “the Lord had placed the curse upon the Negro.” Drop your support for the 1964 civil rights bill, the elder warned, arguing that God might literally strike Romney dead for his apostasy: “I just don’t think we can get around the Lord’s position in relation to the Negro without punishment for our acts,” the letter said. Romney only redoubled his commitment – leading a march the next year down the center of Detroit in solidarity with Martin Luther King’s martyrs for voting rights’ in Selma, Alabama. In 1966, the Republican Party staked its electoral fortunes on opposing open housing for blacks. Romney begged them, unsuccessfully, not to. “This fellow really means it,” an amazed Southern Republican said when Romney toured Dixie pushing civil rights in his presidential campaign; after America’s worst riot broke out in Detroit under his watch, the governor said that America could respond with a crackdown on law and order – “but our system would become little better than a police state.”

Then, most famously, there was the Vietnam War. He supported it after returning from a trip there in 1965. Then, courageously, after a second trip in 1967, he began to criticize it. On September 4, 1967, a TV interviewer asked, “Isn’t your position a bit inconsistent with what it was, and what do you propose we do now?”

The line everyone remembers from his response: “When I came back from Vietnam in 1965, I just had the greatest brainwashing anybody can get when you go over to Vietnam.” But he continued with a devastating, prophetic, and one-thousand-percent-correct assessment: that staying in Vietnam would be a disaster. The public, and certainly the pundits, weren’t ready to hear it. All they heard was the word “brainwashing” – not in the colloquial sense in which Romney obviously intended it, but as something literal. Here was this weird dude accusing our generals and diplomats of Svengali-like mind control. The mockery was swift and furious. (“I would have thought a light rinse would do,” William F. Buckley said – hilarious! Only an idiot would criticize the Vietnam War!) Romney nose-dived sixteen points in the next Harris poll. As I wrote in my book Nixonland, on Vietnam a national brainwashing continued apace.

The Mormon bishop, however, did not quit. Instead he leapfrogged across New Hampshire telling unseasonable truths – that LBJ was “spinning a web of delusion,” and that “when you want to win the hearts and minds of people, you don’t kill them and destroy their property. You don’t use bombers and tanks and napalm to save them.”

George Romney is still an icon here in Michigan, revered by Republican and Democrat alike. Sadly, the only thing Mitt ever learned from him was, as the Rolling Stone article suggests, that telling the truth is the way to kill your political career.

Comments

  1. anandine says

    It reminds me of a lesson GW Bush learned from GHW Bush. The elder Bush promised no new taxes while running for president, but when faced with a choice between acting for the good of the country and for his own political future, he chose the good of the country. GW never made that mistake.

  2. arakasi says

    Everything that I have read so far indicated that George Romney is someone I could respect, even if I didn’t agree with him. The last year has shown me that Mitt Romney is someone I could never respect, even if I did agree with him.

  3. says

    “George Romney is still an icon here in Michigan, revered by Republican and Democrat alike.”

    I don’t care. I still want to see the birth certificate.

  4. slc1 says

    Of course, Romney pere’s mistake was using the term brainwashing. Had he not used that term, he might well have survived as opposition to the war was beginning to rise at the time.

  5. LightningRose says

    anandine @#1

    No. You, like almost all Americans, misunderstood Bush 1 when he said “no new taxes”.

    I understood him perfectly. A federal tax on bubble gum, for example, would be a *new* tax. He increased *existing* taxes but, as promised, created no *new* taxes.

  6. Ichthyic says

    I understood him perfectly.

    You also understood his intent was still to deceive, I hope?

    I gave up using sarcasm meters years back.

  7. juice says

    In fact, it killed his chances of becoming president.

    And Mitt Romney never ever forgot that lesson.

  8. Pieter B, FCD says

    arakasi:

    The last year has shown me that Mitt Romney is someone I could never respect, even if I did agree with him.

    How could you tell?

  9. LightningRose says

    You also understood his intent was still to deceive, I hope?

    I cannot testify to his intent, but if anyone feels deceived by Bush 1′s statement it’s only due to their own ignorance of the English language.

  10. caseloweraz says

    Thanks for the education. I had thought that Romney pere was weak-minded, only because of reactions to his use of the word “brainwashed.” Now I know better.

Leave a Reply