Despite many promises to make the federal government’s drug policy at least slightly more sane, President Obama has turned out to be nearly as bad as Bush — and possibly even worse in some ways.
Kerlikowske’s earnest insistence that you can end the war on drugs if you stop calling it that gives you a sense of the chasm between rhetoric and reality in Obama’s drug policies, which by and large have been remarkably similar to his predecessor’s. With the major exception of crack sentences, which were substantially reduced by a law the administration supported, Obama has not delivered what reformers hoped he would. His most conspicuous failure has been his policy on medical marijuana, which is in some ways even more aggressively intolerant than George W. Bush’s, featuring more-frequent raids by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), ruinous IRS audits, and threats of prosecution against not only dispensaries but anyone who deals with them. “I initially had high hopes,” says Marsha Rosenbaum, “but now believe Obama has abdicated drug policy to the DEA.”
And there were signs that this would happen:
In retrospect, there were warning signs that Obama would disappoint supporters who expected him to de-escalate the war on drugs, just as he has disappointed those who expected him to end the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. As a U.S. senator he bragged about co-sponsoring the Combat Meth Act, which is the reason cold and allergy sufferers throughout the country are treated like potential felons whenever they try to buy decongestants containing pseudoephedrine. He staunchly defended the Edward Byrne Memorial State and Local Law Enforcement Assistance Grant Program, which has fueled the incarceration of nonviolent drug offenders and funded the regional task forces behind racially tinged law enforcement scandals in places such as Tulia, Texas. As New York Times columnist Charles Blow noted last year, this grant program, created at the end of the Reagan administration, “has become the pet project of Democrats” because it’s “an easy and relatively cheap way for them to buy a tough-on-crime badge while simultaneously pleasing police unions.” In 2006 Obama warned that George W. Bush’s attempt to eliminate the Byrne grants (which Obama revived with a $2 billion infusion as part of his 2009 stimulus package) “gives criminals and drug dealers a break by taking cops off the streets.” …
Unwilling to wait for an outbreak of scientific integrity at the DEA, voters or legislators in 16 states and the District of Columbia have taken it upon themselves to legalize the medical use of marijuana. While running for president, Obama repeatedly suggested he was cool with that. Campaigning in New Hampshire during the summer of 2007, he said raiding patients who use marijuana as a medicine “makes no sense” and is “really not a good use of Justice Department resources.” In a March 2008 interview with southern Oregon’s Mail Tribune, he went further, saying, “I’m not going to be using Justice Department resources to try to circumvent state laws on this issue.” Two months later, when another Oregon paper, Willamette Week, asked Obama whether he would “stop the DEA’s raids on Oregon medical marijuana growers,” he replied, “I would, because I think our federal agents have better things to do.”
Critics of the war on drugs were therefore puzzled that DEA raids on medical marijuana providers continued after Obama took office in 2009, even as the White House reaffirmed that “federal resources should not be used to circumvent state laws.” That February The Washington Times reported that Obama planned to suspend the raids after he “nominates someone to take charge of DEA, which is still run by Bush administration holdovers.” We know how that worked out: He picked Leonhart, the Bush administration holdover who had been the agency’s deputy administrator since March 2004 and its acting administrator since November 2007. Prior to that, Leonhart oversaw medical marijuana raids as the special agent in charge of the DEA’s Los Angeles office.
In theory, Leonhart still had to answer to her boss, Attorney General Holder, who claimed to be implementing Obama’s promise to stop harassing state-sanctioned medical marijuana suppliers. “The policy is to go after those people who violate both federal and state law,” Holder declared during a March 2009 session with reporters in Washington. “Given the limited resources that we have,” he said during a visit to Albuquerque three months later, the Justice Department would focus on “large traffickers,” not “organizations that are [distributing marijuana] in a way that is consistent with state law.” …
Yet the DEA’s raids continued. If anything, the pace picked up. Americans for Safe Access counts at least 41 raids on growers or dispensaries between Obama’s inauguration and the Ogden memo, almost five a month on average. As of late May, there had been at least 106 raids since the Ogden memo, nearly six a month. In fact, medical marijuana raids have been more frequent under Obama than under Bush, when there were about 200 over eight years.
Another reason for disappointment.




September 26, 2011 at 8:59 am
Ed Brayton
Posted in
Another signal that President Obama would continue the drug war even on medical marijuana occurred soon after he became president-elect.
Very soon after winning the election his transition team published a website requesting feedback from the public on priorities for the coming administration. The top two requests were glaring (I forgot the order):
While the president spoke out of both sides of his mouth regarding Bush’s use of torture, obviously hoping the public would forget about it while his administration effectively has done nothing, he quite clearly communicated that his administration had no plans to lobby Congress to legalize marijuana nor would they ignore all federal laws regarding marijuana.
Michael, Obama has not “done nothing” on the subject of Bush Co’s war crimes. As Wikileaks revealed, he actually fought hard against any accountability for his predecessor. There had been a case in Spain pending against Bush, Cheney & Rumsfeld, iirc, and it was shown that Obama had pressured them to drop it.
It’s only a disappointment for those who bought into Obama’s rhetoric beforehand. There are people who saw his FISA vote, for example, as an aberration and then there are those who saw it as a sign of where his true right of center nature lays.
If I was American, my vote in 2008 would have gone to the Green Party candidate as “But… Republicans are scarier!” is one of the biggest reasons the Democrats are a broken party.
Back during the 2008 primaries, PUMAs were painted as racists and secret Republicans because they didn’t buy into Obamamania. Yes, many if not most of them were pissed that Clinton didn’t win, but they were also concerned with Obama as a candidate and he certainly hasn’t done much to prove them wrong.
Re Tabby Lavalamp @ #3
What makes Mr. Lavalamp think that President Hillary Clinton would have been any different then President Obama relative to drug laws and prosecuting Bush administration officials?
There is a reason why the Obama administration is not going after the Bush officials. It was put best by the Werner Klemperer character in the movie, “Judgement at Nurenberg. He says, before his sentence is pronounced, “Today you try us, tomorrow, the Russians may try you.” Substitute Bush officials for you and a Rethuglican administration for the Russians and you will get the picture.
I don’t know. I’ll ask him when I see him.
Well, we’re not seeing it here in Colorado. Less than two years after Obama took office Denver had (and still has) more MMJ outlets than Starbucks.
[...] Read More: Barack Obama: Drug Warrior | Dispatches from the Culture Wars [...]
Re Tabby Lavalamp @ #5
Okay, if it’s Ms. Lavalamp, please accept my apologies. Now try not to be a wiseass and answer the question.