I think it’s humerous and intended to be an exaggeration. It is very early in Obama’s national and international career for him to receive this prize. At the same time, he has already done amazing work regarding nuclear de-armament. In another sense, I think his (campaign) comitment to ending the war in Iraq played into this – The Nobel committee wanted to let the world know what they thought of GW Bush, too. “We’re so glad you’re gone, the guy who disagrees with you gets a Nobel prize!”
Probably less shallow than that, but I can see wanting to make a statement that Obama’s approach to diplomacy is more in keeping with peace than GW’s ever was.
Dan Fincke has his PhD in philosophy from Fordham University and is an adjunct philosophy professor at five universities this semester (Fordham, Fairfield, Hofstra, William Paterson, and Hunter College). Hear him overview his ideas about the blog's main topics (ethics, religion, atheism, and the atheist movement) in this definitive half hour interview (given to the podcast "Whatever Whatever Amen"). You can also watch him introduce some of Nietzsche's ideas in a ten minute video. Dan was a devout evangelical Christian until he grappled with The Portable Nietzsche while enrolled at one of America's most conservative Christian undergraduate institutions (Grove City College). He went on to write his dissertation on Nietzsche. Learn more about his deconversion and his views on how (and why) to have civil dialogue with religious people in his hour long interview with the Angry Atheist podcast. Also read his article Apostasy As A Religious Act (Or "Why A Camel Hammers The Idols Of Faith"), which explains why those who want to respect religious people and their experiences should stop trying to silence former believers for speaking out against their former religions. (This article also contains the key to understanding why this blog is named "Camels With Hammers".)
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO CAMELS WITH HAMMERS. And---don't be shy---feel free to friend Dan on Facebook (especially if you don't have many atheist friends on Facebook (or at all!). You should also +1 Dan on Google Plus, follow him onTwitter, and/or or like Camels With Hammers'Facebook page. E-mail Dan at camelswithhammers at gmail . com. Among guest contributors the most frequent is Eric Steinhart, who is a metaphysician and philosopher of religion and Professor of Philosophy at William Paterson University. He is the author of many scholarly articles and three books.
I think it’s humerous and intended to be an exaggeration. It is very early in Obama’s national and international career for him to receive this prize. At the same time, he has already done amazing work regarding nuclear de-armament. In another sense, I think his (campaign) comitment to ending the war in Iraq played into this – The Nobel committee wanted to let the world know what they thought of GW Bush, too. “We’re so glad you’re gone, the guy who disagrees with you gets a Nobel prize!”
Probably less shallow than that, but I can see wanting to make a statement that Obama’s approach to diplomacy is more in keeping with peace than GW’s ever was.
I agree with Fidel Castro’s statement about this award.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20091010/ts_nm/us_nobel_peace_obama_castro_1
“saying on Saturday it was “a positive measure” that was more a criticism of past U.S. policies than a recognition of Obama’s accomplishments.”
The world really really hated Bush / Cheney – and previous administrations.