Exposition of Exodus 21:20-21: How Slave Beaters Are To Be Treated
August 3, 2009 at 10:20 pm Daniel Fincke
20 “If a man beats his male or female slave with a rod and the slave dies as a direct result, he must be punished, 21 but he is not to be punished if the slave gets up after a day or two, since the slave is his property.
Hello fella’s.
First of all, Jesus said to love thy neighbor..this means all people, including African’s! It was the African people themselves who sold their own kind to the west as slaves for profit.
It was NOT condoned in the NT. God is a just God. He does not have preferences based on skin color.
Actually, slavery IS condoned in the New Testament. Paul writes in Ephesians 6:5, “Slaves, obey your earthly masters with respect and fear, and with sincerity of heart, just as you would obey Christ.”
And even if the New Testament did not condone slavery, so what? That would not make the God of the Bible, who was also supposedly the same unchanging God in the Old Testament and the New Testament, a “just God” if he instituted slavery (as he explicitly did in the passage explicated above) in the Old Testament. The (imaginary) reversal you (falsely) claim is in the New Testament does not make the Old Testament any less wicked and the God attested to in that Old Testament any less wicked and unjust.
And slavery is wrong even if it’s not based on “skin color”.
And referring to the Africans as “selling their own kind” is really crude. We’re all the same kind, humankind.
Dan Fincke has his PhD in philosophy from Fordham University and is an adjunct philosophy professor at five universities this semester (Fordham, Fairfield, Hofstra, William Paterson, and Hunter College). Hear him overview his ideas about the blog's main topics (ethics, religion, atheism, and the atheist movement) in this definitive half hour interview (given to the podcast "Whatever Whatever Amen"). You can also watch him introduce some of Nietzsche's ideas in a ten minute video. Dan was a devout evangelical Christian until he grappled with The Portable Nietzsche while enrolled at one of America's most conservative Christian undergraduate institutions (Grove City College). He went on to write his dissertation on Nietzsche. Learn more about his deconversion and his views on how (and why) to have civil dialogue with religious people in his hour long interview with the Angry Atheist podcast. Also read his article Apostasy As A Religious Act (Or "Why A Camel Hammers The Idols Of Faith"), which explains why those who want to respect religious people and their experiences should stop trying to silence former believers for speaking out against their former religions. (This article also contains the key to understanding why this blog is named "Camels With Hammers".)
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO CAMELS WITH HAMMERS. And---don't be shy---feel free to friend Dan on Facebook (especially if you don't have many atheist friends on Facebook (or at all!). You should also +1 Dan on Google Plus, follow him onTwitter, and/or or like Camels With Hammers'Facebook page. E-mail Dan at camelswithhammers at gmail . com. Among guest contributors the most frequent is Eric Steinhart, who is a metaphysician and philosopher of religion and Professor of Philosophy at William Paterson University. He is the author of many scholarly articles and three books.
Hello fella’s.
First of all, Jesus said to love thy neighbor..this means all people, including African’s! It was the African people themselves who sold their own kind to the west as slaves for profit.
It was NOT condoned in the NT. God is a just God. He does not have preferences based on skin color.
TY
Actually, slavery IS condoned in the New Testament. Paul writes in Ephesians 6:5, “Slaves, obey your earthly masters with respect and fear, and with sincerity of heart, just as you would obey Christ.”
And even if the New Testament did not condone slavery, so what? That would not make the God of the Bible, who was also supposedly the same unchanging God in the Old Testament and the New Testament, a “just God” if he instituted slavery (as he explicitly did in the passage explicated above) in the Old Testament. The (imaginary) reversal you (falsely) claim is in the New Testament does not make the Old Testament any less wicked and the God attested to in that Old Testament any less wicked and unjust.
And slavery is wrong even if it’s not based on “skin color”.
And referring to the Africans as “selling their own kind” is really crude. We’re all the same kind, humankind.