Update: Right. It’s not that she’s bizarre and creepy for monitoring all my posts and tweets and then doing “research” on them and writing up the “research” as if it were significant somehow – no, it’s that I am, for pointing out that she’s doing that. Totally makes sense. Nosce te ipsum.
Sometimes the level of obsession is so bizarre and so creepy that it just needs pointing out.
(Click on the images to embiggen.)
Jeremy Stangroom @PhilosophyExp
Blimey, online warriors don’t half love the frisson of collective outrage. My advice is be deeply suspicious of it (and them).
I figure that’s about Ofek and DN Lee and Scientific American, if only because Stangroom monitors Freethought blogs and especially mine so closely. But then why would it be necessary to be deeply suspicious of outrage about it? Why is it wrong to be outraged about it? [Read more…]
