I would so subscribe

8 comments

Skip to comment form ↓

1. 1
   

   Bernard Hurley

   June 22, 2012 at 11:29 am (UTC -7) Link to this comment

   I first came across feminism, or Women’s Lib as it was called then, in the late 60′s. Many things have changed for the better, the King’s Arm no longer has a men only bar; but employers still find sneaky ways round equal opportunities/pay legislation and attitudes have changed surprisingly little.

2. 2
   

   Captaintripps

   June 22, 2012 at 11:36 am (UTC -7) Link to this comment

   While acknowledging that I know why the frustration is being expressed, it’s still important that we are still arguing over these things because there are quite literally millions of people who don’t know about them. Gotta keep edumacatin’!

3. 3
   

   Your Name's not Bruce?

   June 22, 2012 at 11:44 am (UTC -7) Link to this comment

   Don’t forget the special supplementary issue “Watch While we Turn Back the Clock to the Sixteenth Century”.

4. 4
   

   Musical Atheist

   June 22, 2012 at 12:04 pm (UTC -7) Link to this comment

   Nor the centrefold article on how to make modern movies more sexist and erasing of female agency than films made almost half a century ago.

5. 5
   

   NateHevens

   June 22, 2012 at 12:34 pm (UTC -7) Link to this comment

   I’d subscribe, too.

   Personally, I look forward to the “how in the ever-loving hell is this still a problem?” and “oh look, the media still hates women” columns.

6. 6
   

   Greg Laden

   June 22, 2012 at 3:20 pm (UTC -7) Link to this comment

   I’m in.

7. 7
   

   carpenterman

   June 22, 2012 at 3:51 pm (UTC -7) Link to this comment

   With a name that long, there won’t be room for the obligatory hot woman on the front cover.

8. 8
   

   CT

   June 22, 2012 at 7:48 pm (UTC -7) Link to this comment

   With a name that long, there won’t be room for the obligatory hot woman on the front cover.

   that’s okay, we can just cut her head, arms legs out of the picture and she’ll fit.