Javier Krahe has been acquitted of “hurting religious feelings” in a movie he made nearly 40 years ago.
About the Author
Freethought Blogs
- A Million Gods
- Ace of Clades
- Alethian Worldview
- Almost Diamonds
- Ashley Miller
- Biodork
- Black Skeptics
- Blag Hag
- Brute Reason
- Butterflies and Wheels
- Comradde PhysioProffe
- Dispatches from the Culture Wars
- En Tequila Es Verdad
- Greta Christina's Blog
- Heteronormative Patriarchy for Men
- Lousy Canuck
- Mano Singham
- Maryam Namazie
- Nirmukta on FTB
- No Country for Women
- Pharyngula
- Reasonable Doubts
- Richard Carrier Blogs
- Rock Beyond Belief
- The Atheist Experience
- The Crommunist Manifesto
- The Digital Cuttlefish
- The Indelible Stamp
- The Zingularity
- This Week in Christian Nationalism
- YEMMYnisting
- Zinnia Jones
PostsCommentsArchives
Recent Comments
- ApostateltsopA on Good neighbors
- Stephanie Zvan on Definitions
- F [is for fluvial] on Good neighbors
- Markita Lynda—threadrupt on Another emetic
- Wowbagger, Designated Snarker on Definitions
FTB RecentFTB Active
FTB Recent
- Two new reports by One Law for All by Maryam Namazie
- Free political prisoners in Iran by Maryam Namazie
- This week in E. W. Jackson: slavery beats welfare by Stephen "DarkSyde" Andrew
- William Lane Craig doesn't like our Help-Line by Avicenna
- Fighting evil by promoting the good by Martin Wagner
- Alleged Klansmen arrested for trying to sell homemade ray gun to synagogue by Stephen "DarkSyde" Andrew
FTB Active
- More documenting the harassment by Ophelia Benson
- Just how racist is America? by PZ Myers
- Malestrom pt 1: The rights and wrongs of anger by Ally Fogg
- An Open Letter to the Center for Inquiry, Withdrawing My Participation and Support by Greta Christina
- Why Your Daughter's Marriage Shouldn't Be Your Biggest Dream For Her by Anita J
- News from down under: the TRUE skeptical women side with the guys! by Jason Thibeault
Show your love for B&W
Show your ongoing love for B&W
B&W Archives
Visit the complete Butterflies & Wheels archives for posts going back to 2000!
Sorting
Apologetics
Blasphemy
Brendan O'Neill
Burzynski Clinic
CFI
Christopher Hitchens
Cruelty
Deep rifts
Dominionists
Epistemology
Evidence
Female genital mutilation
Feminism
Free speech
Gender segregation
God hates women
Harassment
Human rights
Literature
LSE
Lying for god
Malala Yousafzai
Michael Shermer
Misogyny
MRAs
Patriarchy
Quiverfull
Religious bullying
Religious censorship
Religious child abuse
Religious coercion
Richard Dawkins
Saudi Arabia
Savita Halappanavar
Secularism
Sexism
Sharia
Shut-uppery
The backlash
The Catholic church
The Great Bullying
Theocracy
UCL
US Conference of Catholic Bishops
Vision Forum
Recent Comments
- ApostateltsopA on Good neighbors
- Stephanie Zvan on Definitions
- F [is for fluvial] on Good neighbors
- Markita Lynda—threadrupt on Another emetic
- Wowbagger, Designated Snarker on Definitions


1 comment
Brigadista
June 12, 2012 at 12:52 am (UTC -7) Link to this comment
The full judgement is here (in Spanish): http://ep00.epimg.net/descargables/2012/06/08/391c7931069d6c3df7a7c2817d49f371.pdf
To summarise, Javier Krahe and his co-accused, Montserrat Fernandez Villa (the producer of the 2004 documentary in which Krahe’s 1977 film was shown) were acquitted of the charge of offending religious sentiments under Article 525 of the Spanish Criminal Code. The complaint had been filed by two private individuals, Victor Lozano Martinez and Nicolas de Salas Moreno, and not by the Thomas More Centre for Legal Studies, as was often stated. The confusion arose because Lozano is the Centre’s President and apparently submitted documents to the court on its headed paper (Legal Argument One, point 1). However, I see from its website today that the Centre itself is seeking donations to support an appeal.
The public prosecutor, also a party to the action, moved for the defendants’ acquittal on the grounds that there had been no criminal offence.
The judge’s arguments basically show how difficult it will always be to make any kind of charge like this stick, and he talks a lot about objectivity, assessment of intent and the lack of any proof of a desire to offend. He also talks about artistic creativity and satire and how they are frequently used as a way of criticising authority, particularly religion and the institution of the church which, as he puts it, “have historically been associated with power [in Spain] and therefore also been the subject of legitimate criticism” (Legal Argument Three, point 4).
Article 525 is clearly an absurd anachronism, though it is an even-handed one in that it enshrines the same rights for non-believers. Nevertheless, it has to be seen in the context of a country that has, since 1976, been desperate in its attempts to please all sides in order to avoid a return to the events of the 1930s. This may seem an exaggeration to outsiders, but there are some very extreme elements still bubbling under the surface here, as has become clear in issues as diverse as bull-fighting, gay marriage, opening up mass graves and the languages children should be taught in.