This week in ACA media:
Most of you who watch The Atheist Experience live are aware that there is a live chat room that runs on Ustream. It has, as of recently, been regularly moderated by some combination of Jen, Lynnea, John and me. The purpose of this post is to try to establish some guidelines that will clarify the moderation policy. This list was written primarily by Lynnea, but has been presented to and accepted by the rest of the TV crew.
(Update: These rules now have a permanent web home at http://atheist-experience.org/
Russell, Jen, and a young earth creationist make for a fun half hour, on the two time award winning Atheist Experience. Also: deism, and what do you do about religious parents?
But that is the kind of day we’re having today, folks. Another stupid studio cancellation. But AETV will return next weekend with Matt and Jen, followed by Russell and myself the following weekend.
Word may have gotten out that we have a new building. I haven’t actually toured it myself yet, but I’m hopeful some of it can be McGyvered into a studio of our own where we can do AETV and NPR shows all the live-long day with no interference from anyone. While we still like being on local access, the fact is we really don’t need them any more. Ultimately it’s not my choice to make, but I know we’re sick of a lot of the random crap that Channel Austin throws at us. It would be nice to be able to take total control of our media once and for all.
Welcome to our new home on Freethought Blogs. The transition seems to have gone smoothly, so I assume we’ll have some new people stumbling across us.
The Atheist Experience is a live public access call-in television show based out of Austin, Texas. It launched in 1997. You can learn more about the show here, including information on how to watch live and view the extensive archive. We’ve got two hosts — Matt Dillahunty is on three out of every four weeks, and I (Russell Glasser) host the fourth week. We also have five rotating cohosts: Don Baker, Jeff Dee, Jen Peeples, Martin Wagner, and Tracie Harris.
Since we have fifteen years of live callers behind us, we’ve covered a pretty wide range of personalities. They range from slickly packaged professional apologists like Ray Comfort and Matt Slick on one end, to just plain unexpected silliness on the other.
The Atheist Experience is sponsored by the Atheist Community of Austin, a terrific social group which also supports two other podcasts: The Non-Prophets, a round table discussion group; and Godless Bitches, an atheist feminist podcast.
We’re all looking forward to interacting with the Freethought Blogs community at large, and I’ll be writing a new post introducing myself personally as one of your regular bloggers. Talk to you soon!
Russell and Jeff in the self-described “awesome episode.” One theist caller gets 20 minutes, while another gets summarily dumped after his opening statement. A new study shows that belief in God is linked with intuitive thinking, or to put it another way, preferring to choose the answer that sounds good over thinking carefully about what’s probably correct. Be there!
Also, as I mentioned on the show, Lynnea and I have plans to hang out in a bar with Orlando-based fans on a weeknight in November. Check out this page for planning if you’re nearby.
Secular charities mentioned in today’s show include:
These organizations help real people in this life – the only one we’re sure to get. They’re transparent about what they do, and serve anyone in need.
As I mentioned on the show today, the idea that some reward awaits the faithful in the afterlife is one of the religious doctrines that impairs our ability to solve the problems that plague humanity. It makes it easier to ignore suffering if you think some people are better off dead. Well, it’s not okay with me for people to go without medical care because they’re poor. It’s not okay for people to go hungry in a country where obesity is a major health concern. It’s not okay for women to be pregnant year after year until they die of exhaustion. The organizations above are doing what they can to solve these problems. If you can help, please do, and thank you.
And now, open thread – have at it.
I’ll call you Mark because that was the first name you used when you called us, and I’ve spoken to you at length using that name twice. If that’s not your preferred name, please let me know what name I should use instead.
For a long time, I denied that your calls were coming from the same person — I suppose due to some kind of misguided pride. After all, I thought that you and I had some interesting and even somewhat productive conversations when I was talking to you. I didn’t want to feel like those conversations had been a waste of time, and I was unfairly annoyed with the viewers in email and chat who were trying to point out the obvious — that you were disguising your voice to keep calling.
Even after accepting that you were faking the British accent, I wasn’t completely convinced that you were the original “Mark.” But obviously, you gave the game away when Matt asked you about it this past Sunday. Instead of asking “Who’s Mark?” you answered by repeating an argument from another of your alter egos, which was basically as good as an admission. And I know you read this blog, because you’re obviously the one writing in as “ChrisLanganFan” (and Andrew, when you double-posted) so I thought I’d ask you about this directly.
First of all, why do you feel the need to disguise your identity? We don’t avoid conversations with real theists. A few months ago I invited you to meet us for dinner, and I was serious about it — I’d be happy to meet with you. (Granted, I was also trying to work out whether you were really a native of Austin as you claimed. I guess I have my answer now, and I’m disappointed.)
I recognize that the internet and phone-only conversations can feel impersonal enough that you don’t need to reveal every detail of your identity, but I’ve always valued honesty a great deal. On the web I sometimes go by the screen name “Kazim,” but I’ve always been up front about who I really am and what my real values are. I tend to expect that of others — sometimes, unfortunately, incorrectly.
I had a phone conversation about you with Martin once, when I wasn’t sure whether you were really calling in with multiple names and voices. Here’s what I said in a nutshell: “I suppose Tom might be Mark, but I don’t understand what his goal is. The way I see it, there are three possible reasons why he might be doing it: 1. To make us look bad; 2. to make us look good; 3. Some kind of weird performance art.” Number three doesn’t make much sense to me (again, as someone who values honesty). If it’s number two, we don’t need your help. And if it’s number one, well, first of all you’re not doing a very good job of it; and second of all, I don’t see how it helps you in your goal to use fake identities. Shouldn’t the arguments speak for themselves without worrying about the personality?
I guess what I’m feeling most of all is disappointment mixed with a bit of confusion. On some occasions, you seemed to be very angry about the show. On other occasions, you seemed like you were actually listening to the people who were talking to you and trying to understand what they said. And in the latest calls you’ve started out angry and then switched topics repeatedly without settling on one point long enough to make a lasting impression about it. This Chris Langan fascination seems like a new development — you never asked us about him in your first few calls, and you always seem to hang up before any real discussion about him can get underway. Besides that, you appear to be more fixated on the idea that Chris Langan himself should speak to us directly to defend his ideas rather than being willing to do it yourself.
So I’m just wondering which one is the real you? How do you really feel about our show, and why is it so important that you keep talking with us at all costs? Is it because you really like us, worry about us, hate us, want to shut us down, or what?
I really am interested in trying to understand you better, but I can’t do it without your help. Doesn’t it bother you to try to keep all these lies straight? Wouldn’t it feel better to come out and say what’s really on your mind? Come on, give it a try. What do you say?
If it IS performance art, then I guess you win. You’ve gotten past the screeners multiple times, and now you have a lot of people talking about you. That must really stroke your ego to get all that attention, I guess. Do you want to supply a web site or a podcast so people can admire other facets of your work?
Ball’s in your court, Mark.
Update: “Mark” came clean in comments, pronouncing that he’s an atheist who is deliberately prank calling. He repeatedly states that he will only stop if we devote 75% of the show to theist callers. He is now banned from this blog for all the previous posts in which he’s lied.
Post here about the show on 9/11/2011 with Matt and Jen.
Don and Russell talk abortion and sex ed, then Mike in Detroit tries to make the case that following God’s law fixes everything. Fun time had by all. Have at it.