Oh yeah, here’s that thread about that show. Looks like the blip video’s not up yet, but you can go to the Ustream channel for now.
About the Author
Freethought Blogs
- A Citizen of Earth
- A Million Gods
- Ace of Clades
- Alethian Worldview
- Almost Diamonds
- Ashley Miller
- Biodork
- Black Skeptics
- Blag Hag
- Brute Reason
- Butterflies and Wheels
- Comradde PhysioProffe
- Dispatches from the Culture Wars
- En Tequila Es Verdad
- Greta Christina's Blog
- Heteronormative Patriarchy for Men
- Lousy Canuck
- Mano Singham
- Maryam Namazie
- Near-Earth Object
- No Country for Women
- NonStampCollector
- Pharyngula
- Reasonable Doubts
- Richard Carrier Blogs
- Rock Beyond Belief
- Sincerely, Natalie Reed
- The Atheist Experience
- The Crommunist Manifesto
- The Digital Cuttlefish
- The Indelible Stamp
- The Zingularity
- This Week in Christian Nationalism
- Token Skeptic
- YEMMYnisting
- Zinnia Jones
PostsCommentsArchives
Recent Posts
- More on the Merry Christmas bill
- Texas “Merry Christmas Bill”
- Foundation Beyond Belief OKC relief efforts
- Open thread on episode #814
- Open letter to Corey Keplinger
- Open thread on episode #813
- Theists Have the Best P.R. Machine Ever III
- In an email mood
- How the Problem of Evil uncloaks Christianity’s total moral bankruptcy
- Open thread on episode #812
Recent Comments
- nathan on Open letter to Corey Keplinger
- changerofbits on More on the Merry Christmas bill
- Qyandri on Open thread on episode #814
- changerofbits on Open thread on episode #814
- changerofbits on Open thread on episode #814
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
FTB RecentFTB Active
FTB Recent
- Another hilarious hashtag by Ophelia Benson
- And then there were four… by Mano Singham
- Dinner in Romania by PZ Myers
- iERA Statement in Light of the Woolwich Attack by aronra
- My vast but unsavory power by PZ Myers
- Peeps talking by Ophelia Benson
FTB Active
- [Lounge #419] by PZ Myers
- Open thread on episode #814 by heicart
- Cis people: Help me get a sense of the landscape out there! by Zinnia
- Taking it Personally: Privilege and Women in Secularism by Ashley F. Miller
- Intersectionality? It's been a privilege by Ally Fogg
- #RDFbullies by Ophelia Benson
ACA & Related Sites
- Atheist Community of Austin
- The Atheist Experience TV show site
- AETV UStream feed
- Non-Prophets Radio podcast
- Godless Bitches podcast with Beth Presswood, Tracie Harris & Jen Peeples
- Iron Chariots counter-apologetics wiki

38 comments
Skip to comment form ↓
Jasper T
May 22, 2012 at 7:49 am (UTC -6) Link to this comment
Oh the irony of the last caller and the show topic.
So what “strengthened” is belief in a god was a string of arguments from ignorance.
Logical fallacies strengthen my belief in Zeus. It’s like instead of Tinkerbell and clapping, the more logical fallacies I hear, the brighter my belief.
Jasper T
May 22, 2012 at 7:50 am (UTC -6) Link to this comment
Whoops, that was the previous show, not this one.
noodlyappendage
May 22, 2012 at 7:55 am (UTC -6) Link to this comment
Hey Russell — Something a little OT. I understand you have every non-prophets ever recorded (or something close to it) on your hard drive. Is this correct? If so, would you be able to make a torrent of that, or burn a DVD? I (we?) would love to listen to the older recordings, and as you know the nonprophets web archive only goes back to 4.13…
Let me know if you can do that, or if I can help. Thanks!
Kazim
May 22, 2012 at 8:07 am (UTC -6) Link to this comment
I have the first four seasons recorded only, but that’s apparently what you want. I’ll think about going the torrent route.
Jasper T
May 22, 2012 at 8:09 am (UTC -6) Link to this comment
I second that motion
noodlyappendage
May 22, 2012 at 8:10 am (UTC -6) Link to this comment
Cool, thanks!
Steve
May 22, 2012 at 9:03 am (UTC -6) Link to this comment
Thanks, most of those aren’t available on the website.
Felipe
May 22, 2012 at 9:08 am (UTC -6) Link to this comment
Vigorously this.
Hairy Chris, blah blah blah etc
May 22, 2012 at 4:25 pm (UTC -6) Link to this comment
I second/third/nth this suggestion.
Andrew
May 25, 2012 at 10:33 pm (UTC -6) Link to this comment
Please torrent and I will seed forever.
Zurahn
May 24, 2012 at 1:30 am (UTC -6) Link to this comment
Ray Comfort according to Reddit
MichaelD
May 22, 2012 at 10:50 am (UTC -6) Link to this comment
Also sort of off topic. Did anything ever happen with the nonprophets on google thingy?
Kazim
May 22, 2012 at 2:04 pm (UTC -6) Link to this comment
No, we didn’t get the recording to work. It’s a lot more complicated than it seems like it should be.
MichaelD
May 22, 2012 at 2:08 pm (UTC -6) Link to this comment
Aww ohwell
AJ
May 22, 2012 at 11:19 am (UTC -6) Link to this comment
Is Ustream one of those places like Hulu that doesn’t like you getting at their content if the ads they have aren’t relevant to your location? Because each week I try to watch the recorded show on my ipad and it constantly tells me it is not online.
MichaelD
May 22, 2012 at 12:54 pm (UTC -6) Link to this comment
Course with mr Megolithic world is too complicated guy…
Its worth pointing out that mainstream historians and geologists don’t agree with the water weathering dating of the sphinx for a number of reasons. There’s even a wiki page on the debate. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sphinx_water_erosion_hypothesis
There is also a guy in Michigan that figured out how to move large stones with remarkably simple devices. Whether or not this is how people actually did it doesn’t really matter it shows that it can be surprisingly simple if you put your mind to it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pCvx5gSnfW4
Just watch that video and try to argue that you need advanced machines to move large stones.
Jeff
May 22, 2012 at 10:32 pm (UTC -6) Link to this comment
VERY interesting video, good find!
michaeld
May 23, 2012 at 5:25 pm (UTC -6) Link to this comment
I’m just glad my googlefu was up to finding it again its been a few years since I last saw it.
Chris B
May 23, 2012 at 2:30 am (UTC -6) Link to this comment
I think he’d read ‘Fingerprints of the Gods’ by Graham Hancock. I read it years ago while I was still a Christian and ironically it strongly contributed to my deconversion process. Years later once my critical thinking skills had improved I realised a lot of it is BS, but it makes an exciting and compelling case for all this ‘ancient wisdom and secret ninja skills’ type stuff.
John Kruger
May 22, 2012 at 1:39 pm (UTC -6) Link to this comment
The pyramid guy belonged on last week’s show. Talk about wallowing in the argument from ignorance. The pyramids are impossible to build, thus MAGIC!
As for cults, I always think the biggest factor is how much the members are separated from outside influence. There are many ways to isolate people from other ideas, so there are many ways an organization can be like a cult. I have heard of physically isolating people, forcing them to do things that make them think their old relationships are impossible to continue, demonizing unapproved literature, demonizing or degrading the status of people not in the group, and many more techniques.
There are some religious institutions that do not specifically bar outside ideas and do not kick up any fuss at all if you decide to leave. I could not qualify those as a cult in any way.
DrPinch
May 22, 2012 at 3:00 pm (UTC -6) Link to this comment
I’m curious, if you asked a creationist HOW did god create the universe, what would he say? I mean, they always say “Oh, look at the universe, look at DNA, bla bla bla… it MUST have been created by god!”
Well, okay, then HOW was it created? They must have some sort of explanation beyond “he willed it into existence”, especially if they want creationism to be taught in schools.
Martin Wagner
May 22, 2012 at 3:59 pm (UTC -6) Link to this comment
That’s something I’ve always tried to get a creo to answer. What precise mechanisms were put in motion when God said “Let there be light”? And how did his edict start those mechanisms going? And how do we detect those mechanisms to confirm their existence, and to distinguish them from natural processes? Of course, they never have an answer, unless it’s to say God’s ways are beyond human ken. Which is just another way of saying, “Hell, I don’t know, it’s magic, just believe it!” Beyond being an argument from ignorance, it’s simple intellectual laziness, and worst of all, it cheapens the true majesty of our natural universe with the banality of its ideas. Reality is so much more awe-inspiring and wondrous than the feeble, childish fantasies of supernaturalism that creationists want to attach to it. It’s sad how little believers want to allow themselves to know, satisfying themselves with third-rate make believe that they’ve mistaken for the greatest possible beauty.
DrPinch
May 22, 2012 at 5:18 pm (UTC -6) Link to this comment
So what exactly is their creationist/intelligent design “theory” that they want to teach in schools? And do they actually teach that anywhere?
jacobfromlost
May 22, 2012 at 5:50 pm (UTC -6) Link to this comment
“ID Theory” is not a theory–in fact, there are many various claims and assertions that purport to be “ID Theory”. The most common claim is in “irreducible complexity”; the idea that some things are so complicated, we can’t explain how they got that complicated therefore god must have created them (they pretend to leave the “god” part as simply “some unknown creator” to feign as if it isn’t creationism).
Irreducible complexity is just an appeal to ignorance fallacy. But worse than that, it doesn’t even work they way ID claimants claim it works–ie, the stuff they claim is so complex that it is inexplicable HAS ALREADY BEEN EXPLAINED, and it isn’t irreducibly complex at all.
Here’s a nice clip from the show: watch?v=OP-ENz2Lr7M
Martin Wagner
May 22, 2012 at 7:11 pm (UTC -6) Link to this comment
That’s an excellent question, and one I’ve never heard IDers answer coherently either. I was very much involved, as were several of the rest of us, nine years ago when the Texas SBOE tried (with the full complicity of the Discovery Institute) to insert ID theory into science textbooks. It appeared all they really wanted to do, for all the supposed sophistication of ID compared to earlier builds of creationism, was the same “teach the controversy” bullshit that old school creationists had been attempting for years. Inform students that evolution is a “flawed” theory (by claiming bogus flaws), then let the students “decide for themselves.” ID was nothing more than repackaging old wine in a new bottle, in order to make the movement appear secular to avoid legal church/state issues. Didn’t work.
mond
May 23, 2012 at 10:27 am (UTC -6) Link to this comment
I thought “ID theory” mostly consisted of
Evolution is bunk. (Gaps in fossil record and other erroneous clap trap)
Therefore an intelligent creator (god) did it.
End of story.
Martin Wagner
May 23, 2012 at 1:10 pm (UTC -6) Link to this comment
That’s pretty much it.
Zengaze
May 24, 2012 at 1:11 pm (UTC -6) Link to this comment
I disagree,
You forgot the module on wooooooo look at the trees, and the whole semester dedicated to how we stick to the ground instead of floating off into space as evidence that an intelligence intended us to stick to the ground. Saying its just about debunking the myth of evolution is to dismiss it without due appraisal.
Jdog
May 22, 2012 at 5:35 pm (UTC -6) Link to this comment
I think the theists just swap the awe of how reality works for the awe that a divine being did these things for them.
cjklok
May 22, 2012 at 4:10 pm (UTC -6) Link to this comment
The performance of ‘Mr Pyramid Architecture’ on last weekend’s show (20 May 2012) might call for the extension of the concept ‘Fractal Wrongness’. This has been well defined and eloquently used in discussions by Matt and other members of the AETV team. If anyone is still unfamiliar with the concept, just google “Fractal Wrongness definition”.
In the case of our amusing participant – ‘Mr Pyramid Architecture’ – anyone with even a faint familiarity with the concept of fractal wrongness can see clearly how he was fractally wrong on every topic that arose from his phone call. However, one can also the say that he does suffer from a terminal case of: –
“Fractal Ignorance”.
In each every one of the topics that spun off from his original gripe about the supposed ‘design’ of DNA to the technical capabilities of the pyramid builders, he exhibited mind numbing lack of knowledge, and also some magnificent non-sequiturial jumps. One of the slightly more arcane examples of such a jump was when he conflated the sciences focussing on DNA structure and function with the views of pre-eminent physicists.
In short – as the discussion jumped and diverted from one topic to another, at each and every level, his ignorance reigned supreme.
It may a dubious honor, but ‘Mr Pyramid Architecture’ could be considered the one individual who necessitated the concept of “Fractal Ignorance” as a linguistic shorthand for expressing the hosts’ exasperation and admirable patience.
Zachariah
May 23, 2012 at 1:50 pm (UTC -6) Link to this comment
If John is impressed with the pyramids as an engineering or architectural feat, then he should really check out the Sears tower in his own town.
Don’t see the “ancients” building stuff like that.
Jasper T
May 23, 2012 at 6:26 pm (UTC -6) Link to this comment
Yeah that really got me. The reason why we don’t build any Egypt-style pyramids is beause… why would we?
Sure, they’re cool, but who’s going to put up the money to build a huge pile of stone blocks that doesn’t do anything?
The things we ARE building blow the pyramids out of the water.
Zachariah
May 24, 2012 at 6:52 am (UTC -6) Link to this comment
The ancients were so advanced they are now extinct. I guess they were just too good for earth, so god must have “ascended” them all to heaven where he has them building large mounds of earth in a vain tribute to himself.
If you believe in karma, you might bring it all full circle and argue that there are still people building large mounds of dirt that serve no apparent purpose.
We just call those people “sub-contractors.” See the Boston Big Dig for a contemporary example.
Grandpa Boris
May 24, 2012 at 2:20 am (UTC -6) Link to this comment
It was very frustrating to listen to Russel and Jen fumbling with the pyramid guy. There was a very simple way to stop his inanity. How did the ancient Egyptians manage to build those pyramids? Simple: through trial and error and slow evolution, from non-pyramids to the shapes we think of as the “pyramids” today.
They started with the flat burial structure:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mastaba
Then one specific pharoh, Zoser, decided he wanted more grandeur. He and his successors then built a succession of pyramids, the earliest of which were clearly flawed in their designs, and with the later pyramid builders learning from their predecessors’ mistakes. The first pyramid, Zoser’s, didn’t even look like a proper pyramid, it was a “stepped” layered construction that simply made the existing burial structure, a mastaba, more grand:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyramid_of_Djoser
The next step was to make the sides smooth, but the architects made that pyramid’s walls too steep and the pyramid started to fail before it was even finished. So they made the upper walls slope less:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bent_pyramid
Pyramids built after that had wider bases and the wall angles we associate with pyramids:
http://library.thinkquest.org/10098/egypt2.htm
There is a LOT known about the the people who built the pyramids and how they worked, how they lived, where they lived and why they were doing this. And there are plenty of resources on the web to learn about all this. For example, this Discovery channel program:
http://science.discovery.com/videos/what-the-ancients-knew-i-shorts-building-pyramid.html
terrycollins
May 24, 2012 at 9:01 am (UTC -6) Link to this comment
No comments about this episode in particular, but I just wanted to say thanks again for the show. It’s given me the power to help another atheist deal with coming out, and the difficulties her born-again members the family are giving her.
Zengaze
May 24, 2012 at 1:21 pm (UTC -6) Link to this comment
I’ve decided to venture out of the axp blog less often, I’m tellin ya it’s nuts out there in the ftb jungle. Everyone is trying to jump on top of everyone else in the mating ritual known as conference. Aliens known as the greta and jt are trying to speed up the evolutionary process but I’m thinking the natives enjoy the soup.
Warp
May 25, 2012 at 5:12 am (UTC -6) Link to this comment
Hey, computer engineering does count! Have a little pride. No need to be so humble…
sprawn
May 30, 2012 at 9:01 am (UTC -6) Link to this comment
John from Chicago needs to GET A NEW SMOKE DETECTOR BATTERY. Perhaps if someone tried to convince him that ancient aliens built his smoke detector he would do so.