Tea Party tells Bachmann, “Time to GTFO”
The Tea Party has had enough of Michele Bachman according to the “American Majority”, a Tea Party activist group that operates in seven states and has over 370,000 followers on facebook.
“It’s time for Michelle [sic] Bachmann to go.”- American Majority President Ned Ryun.
“I think it’s pretty obvious that Michele Bachmann is about Michele Bachmann.” – American Majority Executive Director Matt Robbin.
You might recall that Michele Bachman was the self appointed chair of the Congressional Tea Party Caucus before entering the Presidential race.
The full statement from the American Majority is available, here.
(Source: Alan Colmes)


7 comments
Skip to comment form ↓
lordshipmayhem
October 31, 2011 at 14:36 (UTC -4) Link to this comment
“American Majority”: Operates in seven states. Some majority. I suspect they aren’t even representing a majority of the Tea Party within those seven states.
As far as Michele Bachmann goes, any sane, thinking individual would have clued in at least two months ago that their 15 minutes of fame were up. The fact she’s still fighting indicates she either is insane or clueless, or both.
Personally, my money’s on “both”.
Trebuchet
October 31, 2011 at 15:23 (UTC -4) Link to this comment
Bachmann is running because God told her to. She’s not going to quit, barring another revelation. I wouldn’t be surprised to see her keep running as a 3rd party after the nomination, especially if it’s Mitt “not a real Christian” Romney. But perhaps that’s wishful thinking on my part.
Martin
October 31, 2011 at 16:21 (UTC -4) Link to this comment
@Trebuchet:
Michelle is the gift that keeps giving! I’d love her to run as a third party candidate because, not only will it provide laffs, face-palms and other jollity, it will also draw votes and funds away from whoever is nominated by the Reps.
Robert
October 31, 2011 at 18:06 (UTC -4) Link to this comment
I’d love her to go on.so it will be clearly to all,how insane she is.Not only insane,but dangerous.
Art
October 31, 2011 at 18:16 (UTC -4) Link to this comment
Kind of sad watching the desperate girls from the back room at the frat party get thrown out. They said all the right things, and push comes to shove they would do anything, anything at all, to get noticed and spend time with the popular guys. They thought once in they could build friendships and relationships, be a member in the community, but what they said to get in the door, and what they did to stay, left them degraded and used. Her makeup is smeared and run, her dress is a mess, her knees are black with mung from the polluted floor, she is worn and the wild-eyed enthusiasm has lost its edge. She is led quietly to the back door and told to leave.
The frat boys she serviced will act like they have never seen her before. If they remember her name it will only be spoken in a whisper to other frat boys when talking about how wild their parties can get. After a while her name will disappear entirely and she will be referred thereafter as ‘that dumb blonde’ … the one who was such a sport.
Used, abused, laughed at, and then discarded. The sad thing is that everyone knew it would go down like this. Everyone except Michele Bachmann.
She is still young, and still fairly pretty, as GOP operatives go, so there is a good chance she will get invited to the next dance.
anfractuous
November 1, 2011 at 15:25 (UTC -4) Link to this comment
This is a seriously degrading description of how you think of women, and disturbingly detailed. In fact, you come off sounding far more depraved and loathsome than Bachmann.
abb3w
October 31, 2011 at 18:17 (UTC -4) Link to this comment
Apparently, the Insider.AmericanMajority website is in the process of reorganizing; the post is relocated/archived to here.
Quoted on the off chance Ned Ryun decides to try vanishing it down the memory hole:
I’m not sure for what reason they’re turning on her. That she’s not actually at the head of the GOP candidate pack? That they think she’s not sincere? That they’re afraid she’ll try and shift her message to the political right of the Tea Party?