January 22, 2013 at 1:34 pm
My cousin recently went into eclampsia in the last month of her pregnancy. She nearly died. Fortunately for the baby, she was far enough along in the pregnancy that he survived, too.
It happens. People who think that continuing a pregnancy is NOT an active choice don’t know what the hell they’re talking about.
A good friend of mine is currently in and out of the hospital due to high blood pressure. She’s due in March. I’m hoping that nothing goes wrong before then, and that she has a safe delivery.
January 22, 2013 at 1:37 pm
The notion that life begins at conception is complete balderdash. Since more then half of all conceived eggs fail to implant, that makes god the worlds leading abortioner.
Ashley F. Miller says
January 22, 2013 at 1:53 pm
Yeah, the whole pregnancy complications thing is pretty terrifying.
Don’t ever google fistula.
January 22, 2013 at 1:54 pm
To be fair, that seems to be generally in keeping with God’s behavior overall.
Forbidden Snowflake says
January 22, 2013 at 2:20 pm
You are 14.5 times more likely to survive pregnancy in Greece than you are in the US
Unless the chance to survive a pregnancy in the US is less than 6.5%, that doesn’t make sense. Did you perhaps mean “You are 14.5 times less likely to die of pregnancy in Greece than you are in the US”?
January 22, 2013 at 2:22 pm
I think the case of McFall v Shimp pretty annihilates the “consent to sex is consent to pregnancy” argument. McFall needed bone marrow to live. Shimp volunteered to be tested for compatibility. He was the only match. This did not obligate him to go through with the bone marrow donation. He was allowed to back out even after volunteering to start the process.
There are many reasons to have sex that have nothing to do with procreating.
There is only one reason to have your HLA type tested against your cousin who is dying of blood disease–to eventually give him your bone marrow. If consent to testing that’s only purpose is to lead to bone marrow donation isn’t consent to actually donating bone marrow, then consent to a multipurpose activity like sex is definitely not consent to pregnancy.
Giuoco Piano says
January 22, 2013 at 3:43 pm
Ashley, please acknowledge Forbidden Snowflake’s comment and correct your post. Maternal survival rate is ~99.996% in Greece vs. ~99.979% in the US per WHO’s 2010 numbers. (approx 4 deaths/100,000 live births in Greece, approx 21 deaths/100,000 live births in the US)
If your “14.5 times more likely to survive pregnancy in Greece than you are in the US” statement were correct, US maternal survival rates would supposedly be ~7%.
January 22, 2013 at 3:57 pm
January 22, 2013 at 4:07 pm
More specifically Rectovaginal Fistula…your right….don’t google it.
Carol Lynn says
January 22, 2013 at 7:00 pm
Thanks. I needed this.
January 23, 2013 at 10:58 am
I can think of a whole raft of pregnancy complications I’d rather have a rectovaginal fistula than. At least RVF can be repaired. It’s gross, but it can be repaired. Other damage may be more permanent.
January 23, 2013 at 9:18 pm
Abortion is murder just look on google killing an innocent child just because someone can’t see it. Babies are surviving at such a small number of weeks people need to see what an abortion does to the child inside them. It made me feel so sick and sad to look at the pictures google had to offer. Look at them pictures and you will see what I see.
January 23, 2013 at 9:30 pm
Good news! The Catholic Church has declared that fetuses are not “persons”,. and should not be treated such under the law–in any case where they might cost the RCC money.
As Jason Langley, an attorney with Denver-based Kennedy Childs, argued in one of the briefs he filed for the defense, the court “should not overturn the long-standing rule in Colorado that the term ‘person,’ as is used in the Wrongful Death Act, encompasses only individuals born alive. Colorado state courts define ‘person’ under the Act to include only those born alive. Therefore Plaintiffs cannot maintain wrongful death claims based on two unborn fetuses.”
Markita Lynda—threadrupt says
January 24, 2013 at 2:41 pm
McFall v Shimp: was he afraid of needles? Couldn’t he donate under anesthesia? Why aren’t people out hounding *him* as a murderer? /rhetorical questions.
That kills the “but it’s a person” argument even deader than pointing out that skiing isn’t consenting to get one’s arm broken.
January 24, 2013 at 2:45 pm
Then, Amy, God is the biggest abortionist of them all, because probably 40^% of pregnancies end in abortion, often before a woman knows she’s pregnant. He was already the biggest murderer. And that’s not to mention the clever schemes by which a hundred tadpoles or a thousand fish or a million sea urchins or two hundred kittens or baby birds are born so that one can survive to adulthood, nor the insects where babies are “born” by eating their way out of their mother. Nice fellow, your God.
January 28, 2013 at 6:32 pm
If life begins at conception, then the analogies Ashley used of self defense does not address the issue with abortion. In the case of self defense, the person that was killed was the criminal who did the crime, and justice is served. But what wrong has the fetus done to you that you have to kill it?
The real issue is one side says it is wrong to kill for our convenience, the other side says it is not.
I think then the mother would have to wrestle through this issue emotionally, morally, and in terms of the baby’s future.
Emily Saunders says
February 3, 2013 at 12:05 am
I mean, yeah I agree that most people would agree with your assessment, that life does not in fact begin at conception. But speaking as one who has had one miscarriage, and is currently pregnant without planning to be (we used protection and I was on BC, but this still happened)– I, personally, believe that for me, I couldn’t in essence “kill” a potential child of mine.
I have no problem with other women who do not feel the same way, and I’m sure many women do not. But myself, I tend to look at it as: if you let the pregnancy continue, and nothing happens like a medical emergency, or a miscarriage, etcetc, would that embryo/fetus continue into a living being? Most times, I would say yes.
There are tragic cases where a woman becomes pregnant and delivers prematurely, WAY prematurely (so much so that the fetus would not be able to survive); are born with disorders (i.e., more than 90% of their brain missing), and in those cases, should you know about it ahead of time, I TRULY believe it is up to the woman [and her partner, should he/she be present] on what to do… and if her choice is to have an abortion, then that’s her choice.
Mostly though (at the end of this long rant), I don’t think it’s anyone else’s decision or place to tell a woman what to do with her body. If she chooses to have sex with 30 different men a year, it’s her choice. If she gets pregnant and chooses to have an abortion for whatever reason, that’s also her choice. But it’s MY choice to believe that life does start at birth, and woe betide anyone who tells me differently– the zygote, embryo, fetus, baby, cell, WHATEVER, grows from day one of being implanted until they die– going from one cell at conception, to 100 billion cells by birth, to 100 trillion cells by the time they’re a “grown” adult; how can people say that, in effect, something like that is not alive in some way?
February 3, 2013 at 6:51 pm
Even after I became an atheist, I was strongly opposed to abortion under I understood it in these terms: a pregnancy is, to all effects, an organ donation. Let’s imagine that right now, there is a person dying in the hospital in need of a partial liver transplant, and I am a match. If I donate my liver, it’s a pretty safe operation, and the person lives instead of dying, and the liver grows over time anyways, but can I be FORCED to donate? Which is more important: that person’s right to life or my right to my bodily autonomy? In all cases except pregnancy, we have decided that my bodily autonomy is more important, and I can be neither forced nor coerced to donate organs, blood or tissue.
When people try to argue against abortion, they are indeed saying that the bodily autonomy of the woman is less important than the life of the baby – that the woman should be forced to donate her uterus and her blood, with the months of physical distress, recovery time and risks to health and life that it entails. But if that is so, if it’s all about “saving lives”, then it should be mandatory for everyone to donate every organ and tissue they can, regardless of the health and life risks…
Rollover Accident says
May 6, 2013 at 5:41 pm
i actually do go along with an individual!
adult sex blog says
May 13, 2013 at 8:16 am
I’ve been exploring for a little for any high-quality articles or weblog posts in this sort of area . Exploring in Yahoo I ultimately stumbled upon this website. Studying this information So i’m satisfied to show that I’ve a very good uncanny feeling I discovered just what I needed. I so much unquestionably will make sure to do not forget this website and provides it a look on a constant basis.
Enter your WordPress.com blog URL
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.
Notify me of follow-up comments by email.
Notify me of new posts by email.