Houston Atheists’ challenge to Ken Ham


Vic Wang of Houston Atheists explains their standing debate challenge to Ken Ham of answersingenesis.

Be sure to see the end notes.

We haven’t heard from Mr Ham since Prof Myers PhD threw his gauntlet into the ring alongside mine.

Comments

  1. StevoR : Free West Papua, free Tibet, let the Chagossians return! says

    Brave Sir Ken Ham ran away.
    Boldly ran away, away
    When Myers and Ra raised their challenging heads
    Ole Ken Ham very bravely fled
    Bravest of the brave Ken Ham!

    – With apologies to Monty Python & The namesake NASA astronaut

  2. L.Long says

    Despite everything he claims to believe Ken is not so stupid as to take on PZ/RA
    as he knows that in logic and debate he would look stupid to even his own sheeple.

  3. says

    Clearly the kind of people Ham wants to debate are academics who’ve had little to no experience arguing with shine-swilling six-toed creationist whackaloons before; through a combination of Gish Galloping and stupid retorts like “were you there?” (something which, oddly enough, doesn’t count when you ask it of a creationist) he’d at least be able to give the impression of stumping them. It’s easy to make someone look wrong-footed when you’re an adult asking questions that would seem stupid to a 9 year-old.

    The thought of getting taken to the cleaners by people like PZ, an academic with a lifetime’s knowledge and study of evolution and a history of uncompromisingly debunking creationism and Aron, a ferocious opponent with an enviable knowledge of cladistics and palaeontology, must keep him up at night. It’s a pity this probably won’t happen because I would pay real, actual money to see a shyster like Ham get both of those particular barrels.

  4. Trevor says

    I’ve always looked at the whole “were you there” question as follows.

    You’re at home with your 4-yr old son, Timmy. Just the two of you. No one else is home, and you don’t have any pets. You’re both in the kitchen, and there’s a slice of chocolate cake on a plate on the kitchen table. The phone rings, and it’s your neighbor who asks you to come over and help with a MacGuffin problem. You tell Timmy not to eat the cake, and you’ll be back in a moment. You go to the neighbor’s, returning 15 minutes later.

    The plate holding the chocolate cake s empty, save for a few crumbs. Chocolate icing is smeared on the table in little hand prints. Timmy is standing by the table. Chocolate icing is on his hands, mouth, and shirt. There’s a little pile of chocolate cake crumbs on the floor by his feet. You ask Timmy if he ate the cake, and he says no. When he speaks you can see chocolate icing on his teeth.

    Do you punish Timmy?

    If the answer is yes, why? Did you see him eat the cake? Were you there? No to all. So by what logic do you punish Timmy? Surely he must go unpunished, as there’s no possible way to determine what happened to the cake since, after all, you weren’t there to see what happened to it.

  5. says

    I like to imagine the sort of conversations that go on at Answers in Genesis when discussing these challenges. They’re in a meeting room discussing the challenge for a debate. Ken and each of his cronies knows deep down inside that their arguments are bullshit but they think that everybody else truly believes.

    Must be awkward coming up with excuses for not agreeing to the debate. And coming up with ones that seem reasonable to their flock so they don’t look like cowards.

  6. allanjones says

    Should creationists be debated? They can actually ‘win’ debates because they can toss out tons of well rehearsed bullshit. Treat them like flat earthers. They should either be ignored or mocked.

  7. says

    You can’t ignore Ham. He is one of the single most founts of scientific illiteracy in the country. Thousands of children and adults are misled by him ever year.

  8. John Nugent says

    Last I heard, which has been a little while, so it’s possible that things have developed, Ham was still whining over the “unprofessional” insults in the challenge letter and about there not being an address given, where he could answer the challenge. Could it be, he was too lazy to google “Houston Atheists?” Oh that’s right. Indolence is the hallmark of the modern Creationist. He’s getting a lot of sympathy on a number of Creationist blogs.

    I’ll have to check for developments. I want to see the Youtube of this debate, and I won’t be able to, if the debate doesn’t take place.

  9. L.Long says

    These apologists ‘win debates’ by cheating because they are not moderated or moderated to their advantage.
    Get a debate with a FAIR moderator who also has a mic killer button and let each side argue back and forth under control such that the dimwit can’t throw out 50 BS statements in a few seconds and ….
    OH! sorry I just realized they would probably not agree to do so.

    • John Nugent says

      Ham’s blog article about the challenge says that he intends to answer it. However, what he probably plans is to not answer it and then, when the debate doesn’t take place, claim victory by default.

  10. says

    Needed to draft you that very little word in order to thank you very much as before for these exceptional advice you’ve shown in this article. It’s certainly remarkably open-handed with you to present unhampered precisely what a lot of people would’ve offered for sale as an ebook in making some dough for their own end, precisely given that you might well have done it in case you decided. Those guidelines likewise worked like a great way to fully grasp other individuals have the same zeal just like my very own to realize more and more pertaining to this problem. I know there are lots of more fun moments in the future for people who look over your website.

  11. says

    I definitely wanted to construct a simple message to be able to thank you for the lovely tips you are giving out here. My prolonged internet look up has at the end been compensated with high-quality information to share with my partners. I ‘d point out that many of us site visitors actually are undeniably endowed to be in a good site with so many lovely individuals with good suggestions. I feel somewhat blessed to have come across your entire website and look forward to plenty of more fun moments reading here. Thanks again for everything.

  12. says

    hey there and thank you for your info – I have certainly picked up anything new from right here. I did however expertise a few technical issues using this web site, since I experienced to reload the website many times previous to I could get it to load correctly. I had been wondering if your web host is OK? Not that I’m complaining, but slow loading instances times will often affect your placement in google and can damage your high quality score if ads and marketing with Adwords. Anyway I’m adding this RSS to my email and can look out for a lot more of your respective interesting content. Ensure that you update this again soon..

  13. says

    I simply desired to thank you so much yet again. I do not know the things that I would have handled in the absence of the tactics discussed by you directly on this field. It absolutely was a distressing crisis in my view, however , coming across a new well-written style you dealt with it forced me to weep with fulfillment. I am happier for your information as well as sincerely hope you recognize what a powerful job you were accomplishing educating men and women via your websites. Probably you have never met any of us.

  14. says

    I would like to point out my affection for your generosity giving support to those people who should have help on this particular concern. Your personal dedication to getting the solution up and down appeared to be pretty invaluable and has enabled most people much like me to attain their goals. Your invaluable recommendations means a lot a person like me and much more to my fellow workers. Regards; from everyone of us.

  15. says

    I simply had to thank you very much all over again. I’m not certain the things I would’ve undertaken in the absence of the type of tricks contributed by you about such a industry. It was the distressing difficulty for me, nevertheless witnessing a new skilled mode you dealt with the issue forced me to jump over gladness. Extremely grateful for your guidance and even hope you know what a great job you have been undertaking teaching the rest through the use of your web page. I know that you have never encountered all of us.

  16. says

    Hello, I think that I saw you visited my web site so I came to “return the favor”.I’m attempting to find things to improve my site!I suppose its ok to use some of your ideas!!

  17. says

    Fantastic beat ! I would like to apprentice while you amend your web site, how can I subscribe for a blog site? The account helped me a acceptable deal. I had been tiny bit acquainted of this your broadcast offered bright clear concept

  18. says

    Pretty section of content. I just stumbled upon your weblog and in accession capital to assert that I acquire actually enjoyed account your blog posts. Any way I will be subscribing to your feeds and even I achievement you access consistently quickly.

  19. says

    Woah! I’m really enjoying the template/theme of this blog. It’s simple, yet effective. A lot of times it’s difficult to get that “perfect balance” between user friendliness and visual appeal. I must say you’ve done a very good job with this. Also, the blog loads very fast for me on Chrome. Outstanding Blog!

  20. says

    Hello would you mind letting me know which webhost you’re utilizing? I’ve loaded your blog in 3 different internet browsers and I must say this blog loads a lot quicker then most. Can you suggest a good web hosting provider at a reasonable price? Kudos, I appreciate it!

Trackbacks