Emily for Elizabeth

One of those drums that I’m going to keep on beating is that if you don’t like your political representation, it’s frequently because you wait until election day to get involved. Me? I’ve got Al Franken and Keith Ellison representing me, and I’m damned proud of it.

There is an opportunity to add to the ranks of politicians at the national level who actually represent our interests, if not our individual states. Elizabeth Warren is running for Senate in Massachusetts. The name doesn’t ring any bells? That’s because her consumer advocacy work has been blocked at every turn by Congress. I can’t think of a better introduction to her than her many Daily Show appearances included below.

If you do know who she is, you know that she is not about “politics as usual.” She is not about monied interests being in control of our politics. She is about individuals having the true freedom to make choices that comes from being on a (more) level playing field with the big guys.

Continue reading “Emily for Elizabeth”

Emily for Elizabeth
{advertisement}

Cheating at Cards With Jesus

I follow a bunch of local writers on Twitter. (Minneapolis is infested with us.) I don’t usually expect their feeds to start looking like those of my atheist friends, but a couple of mornings ago…

It took no time at all for that number to grow.

I suggested that she put them in touch with each other and recommend a Last Supper-themed party. I also read the poem.

Continue reading “Cheating at Cards With Jesus”

Cheating at Cards With Jesus

Another Live One

Just over a year ago, Jason tangled with a couple of astrologers over at Lousy Canuck about proving the usefulness of astrology. Well, we both did, but Jason did almost all the heavy lifting. I mostly just had to put up with one of them spoiling a Kylie Minogue song in order to tell me he couldn’t get me out of his mind. (Yeah, still creepy, even now.) It was so illustrative of the problems with pseudoscience that we did a radio show about it and epic enough that one of the astrologers changed his name, moved his blog, and got rid of any mention of Jason.

But now a new astrologer has shown up to defend his own personal brand of hand-waving mysticism. The problem, you see, was that:

The Dorkstar does not speak for “astrology,” nor does he qualify as an “astrologer,” unless of course one means in that cartoonish sense, like how Paula Abdul contributes to the great history of music with her lofty seat on American Piehole — it’s a known fact in LA that Paula simply cannot sing. Her vocal tracks were processed with pitch-adjusting tools. The raw versions are simply awful.

But, think about it, only someone as daft and unscholarly as Dorkstar would embarrass himself so much in public so often, inspiring ridicule across the “Internets” among the many real pros who have been on the cutting edge of astrology, and spent the better part of their lives devoted to the matter.

And the solution:

Yes, let’s DO HAVE a real debate on astrology, but this time WITH A QUALITY ASTROLOGER.

Although he won’t confirm it, I think astrologers are contractually obligated to talk that way. Just as they’re apparently contractually obligated to claim an understanding of statistics and to suggest that anyone who doubts them needs help with their love life.

But the real question: Can they offer anything that even starts to approach scientific evidence for the effectiveness of astrology? Tune in next week…wait, no. Just go over to Jason’s and see how well this one does. Or even just whether he has anything to offer that isn’t an insult.

Another Live One

Keep the Gay in YA

Not all anti-gay sentiment comes as blatantly and proudly packaged as Orson Scott Card’s bigotry. Much of it is more subtle and less personal. “I’m sure I don’t have problems with gay people, but we both know we have to deal with people who aren’t so enlightened.” Or something.

Whatever it is, authors Rachel Manija Brown and Sherwood Smith have just had a run-in with it over a young adult novel they wrote together.

Our novel Stranger has five viewpoint characters; one, Yuki Nakamura, is gay and has a boyfriend. Yuki’s romance, like the heterosexual ones in the novel, involves nothing more explicit than kissing.

An agent from a major agency, one which represents a bestselling YA novel in the same genre as ours, called us.

The agent offered to sign us on the condition that we make the gay character straight, or else remove his viewpoint and all references to his sexual orientation.

Rachel replied, “Making a gay character straight is a line in the sand which I will not cross. That is a moral issue. I work with teenagers, and some of them are gay. They never get to read fantasy novels where people like them are the heroes, and that’s not right.”

[…]

LGBTQ teenagers already get told this. They are four times more likely than straight teenagers to attempt suicide We’re not saying that the absence of LGBTQ teens in YA sf and fantasy novels is the reason for that. But it’s part of the overall social prejudice that does cause that killing despair.

We wrote this novel so that the teenagers we know – some of whom are gay, and many of whom are not white – would be able, for once, to read a fun post-apocalyptic adventure in which they are the heroes. And we were told that such a thing could not be allowed.

What they did afterward was pretty epic. First, they modified the book to add more gay. Then, they set out to determine how widespread the problem is in publishing. They are collecting author stories of similar treatment, pseudonymously as necessary, since publishing is such a tiny business. And they offer suggestions for editors and readers who want to counter the idea that they don’t want gay in their YA.

Go find out what you can do to help make sure the gatekeepers know they’re not speaking for you.

Keep the Gay in YA

And Then You Wait

Michele Bachmann has decided that the HPV vaccine is an excellent political bludgeon, as it’s one of the few issues on which Rick Perry is less insane than she is. She’s playing it as an emotional “parental rights” issue. She has no idea of the actual emotions involved. The following is a repost from here.

One day your doctor calls. You think to yourself, “Huh. Last clinic, it would have been a nurse. Whatever.” And the news is good: Blood work, even the special stuff they did because you’ve not been feeling well and you have a family history, is perfectly, beautifully normal.

Oh, except the Pap smear came back abnormal and here’s the number for a gynecological clinic and tell them “CIN 2-3″ when you call to make the appointment for a colposcopy.

Continue reading “And Then You Wait”

And Then You Wait

Minneapolis Primary Today

Don’t like the candidates you’re offered when it’s time to vote? Now’s your chance to decide who goes on the ballot, at least if you live in state Senator Linda Berglin’s district. There’s a special primary today for the special election that will be held in November to fill the seat she leaves vacant in District 61.

I usually provide a sample ballot for primaries and regular elections. Today’s is a little different, because I haven’t decided yet whom I’m voting for. There are a number of good choices.

Minneapolis being what it is, there are no Republicans on the ballot for this seat and only one Green Party candidate. The primary is DFL only, with six candidates. Kristian Heuer and Kyle Wilson appear to be the white guys with no political experience who have decided they can do the job better. I won’t be voting for either of them. I won’t reward only lately noticing that there’s a problem then feeling I should reward them by starting them near the top.

The rest of the candidates all have experience, from community and party organizing to serving as a state representative. They all also have slightly different priorities for top issues to work on once they’re in the Senate. From here, it’s just a matter of deciding whose priorities fit mine and how much I want new blood in the Senate versus established political connections. Here are the choices:

If you’re in this district, please take a few minutes to read what the candidates have prepared for you. Then find your polling place and vote.

Minneapolis Primary Today

Geeking Out About Leverage

This week is Speak Out With Your Geek Out, a week dedicated to celebrating the positive in fandom and geekery. It’s a week for setting aside how XYZ ruined your childhood with a reboot or director’s cut. It’s a week for geeks to take some of that boundless enthusiasm and apply it to ourselves, instead of allowing ourselves to be defined by the mainstream other. It’s geek pride writ small and personal on a massive scale.

Given that I’ve recently been locked in battle with myself on sleeping versus watching one more episode of Leverage, it seemed natural to write about that for the event. So, here is why I love Leverage.

The Cons

No, I don’t mean that I love the show for its faults. Leverage is about a group of con artists, with a new job each week. It’s possible that may not sound exciting to you, but I have an abiding love for fraud. I love watching the team find their mark’s weaknesses, their irrationalities and uncontrolled desires, and build a plan to exploit them. I love watching them herd people into blind canyons or adapt on the fly to problems or unexpected opportunities. This is one very smart, tricky show.

Continue reading “Geeking Out About Leverage”

Geeking Out About Leverage

With God on Our Side…of the River

Yesterday, my husband participated in Minneapolis’s Urban Assault Ride, a checkpoint bike race with silly challenges at each stop that finally ends in a beer garden. Once he was there and rehydrating, he started posting photos, as any good photographer would. When he titled one “Huh…okay…”, it caught my attention.

Saint Paul

Dude, that kilt is too long. Yeah, I know they tell you to measure them to the bottom of the knee, but that just looks silly and cuts off one of the shapelier parts of the leg. Besides it’ll chafe in the rain when the hem…wait, that wasn’t my point.

Continue reading “With God on Our Side…of the River”

With God on Our Side…of the River

On the Importance of Forgetting

There are good things about remembering. There are lessons to be learned, common bonds to be forged, legacies to be passed on.

There are also good reasons to forget. I’m not talking about the simple, “Oh, remembrance hurts” kind of reason, though there is never any shame in taking needed breaks. I’m talking about things that make the world better.

We don’t always learn the right lessons from history. We make myths and stories before our understanding matches our need to make sense of surreality. We don’t understand the scope and causes of events until we have had time to look around us, take everything in, and argue out the details. Holding fast to our initial impressions and explanations can make us wrong in terribly important ways. Sometimes the most important thing we can do, the thing that moves us forward as a family, as a nation, as a species, is giving up our flawed memories.

We should not always cling to someone because they share the history we do, particularly not as unreliable memory presents that history to us. If all we remember is that someone else did something we did not or, in most cases, would not, we have learned nothing about ourselves. We may have more in common with the desperate people who sometimes create the most vivid moments in our memory than we do with those who exhort us to remember. As much as we might prefer to deny those similarities, they still affect our lives and our nations. Setting aside that vivid memory may allow us to see the present that much more clearly.

Life changes, or it isn’t life. As much as any of us may want our own legacy remembered, we will all, someday, make way to another generation. We will be forgotten, even if it happens long after our deaths. And that is okay. That is, in fact, exactly what we should want to have happen. We may build knowledge, but if another generation fails to build on it and be recognized in their own right, we’ve contributed less to humanity than if our names were chiseled in stone for eternity. We may create art, but if no one reinterprets it to those who don’t live as we do, the art dies with us, even if it is set in stars in Earth’s night sky. Our legacy is change, or it is nothing. That requires forgetting as well as remembering.

So on this day of remembrance, give yourself permission to forget. You will anyway, a little here and a little there. Give yourself permission to loosen your grip on the world that some say was created that day and create the world we should have. We will all be the better for it.

Further Reading:

On the Importance of Forgetting

Agreeing With a Woman in Public: A Cautionary Tale

Dear men,

Now that my blog is on a network that gets lots of traffic, it has the opportunity to expose you to a risk you may not have previously considered. If it occurs to you, by some strange coincidence, that I have said something reasonable, I beg you to stop and think about your next step carefully.

You see, I happen to be female. I know, that may seem obvious from the name, but a few other men apparently haven’t taken that fully into account. What have they done in their ignorance? They’ve agreed with me. And that can’t happen without consequences.

On Friday morning, Greg Laden and Scicurious blogged on the origins of the human female orgasm. Greg covered background on primate sexual and social behavior that should inform any research on the topic. Sci dug into a recent twin-study paper and looked at how well it demonstrated what it claimed (or didn’t).

On Friday afternoon, Sci sent me an email titled, “Jeezus H Christ on a breadstick what is wrong with people.” “How DO you put up with this all the time?!?!” she asked. It included a link to a comment on her post.

Continue reading “Agreeing With a Woman in Public: A Cautionary Tale”

Agreeing With a Woman in Public: A Cautionary Tale