Quantcast

«

»

Aug 25 2009

What’s Wrong with the U.S.?

Charlie Stross hits where it hurts:

I’ve been suppressing the urge to explode angrily ever since Thursday, when Abdelbaset Al Megrahi was officially released from prison and flown home to Libya. His release — on compassionate grounds, as he is suffering from terminal cancer and has weeks to live. Mr Al Megrahi was serving a life sentence, handed down by a rather oddly constituted Scottish court for his part in the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie in 1988 — the biggest aviation disaster ever in British airspace, and one of the biggest acts of terrorism of that decade.

What am I angry about?

Go read. He got it in one, I think.

10 comments

Skip to comment form

  1. 1
    Philip H.

    He's so right in so many ways. I'd love to see his take on the CIA torture investigations.

  2. 2
    John Moeller

    He does get many things right, although I think it's not just about the poor, I think it's also about race. There's a nasty sentiment running through the conservative mindset about being cuckolded.While I understand the reaction of British who are disgusted at American systems, I'm a little annoyed by the post. He denounces the BNP, but at the same time, he lumps the entire US into one ideological entity. It's as though there aren't any of us actually trying to change things over here.

  3. 3
    Kelly McCullough

    Thanks for the link. Nice discussion over there and some of the data posts came in very handy earlier this afternoon.

  4. 4
    Stephanie Zvan

    Phil, Charlie's a good guy and damned observant.John, I don't think he's lumping us into a single ideological entity. I do think he's noting a tendency even among liberals to say to our opponents, "May you rot at the first opportunity." I don't think it happens with anything like the same frequency among differing ideologies, but it does happen, and it bugs me too when I see it. There's got to be a better way to engage–or disengage. It won't necessarily make a difference to the people who dig their feet in and cover their ears, but I think it must to those of us doing the talking.Kelly, um, wow. Saw that "discussion" (i.e., fact followed by "I don't like your facts") and…wow.

  5. 5
    Kelly McCullough

    Yeah, that was…special. That sort of "discussion" is one of the reasons I do less political blogging than I maybe ought. The amazing ability of people to allow ideology to trump data causes my blood pressure to soar.

  6. 6
    tsisageya

    One name. Paul Minor.

  7. 7
    Stephanie Zvan

    This Paul Minor?http://www.talkleft.com/story/2004/03/15/047/28497I don't see the connection.

  8. 8
    Jason Thibeault

    Paul Minor? Really?Just another attempt at building a false equivalency. We point out a dozen egregious things that the other side is doing, they point out some minor corruption on our own side as though it was capable of balancing the scales. Or they make stuff up from whole cloth, inventing conspiracies and other bullshit about our political lions to make up for the fact that theirs are legitimately corrupt and shiftless bastards.

  9. 9
    Stephanie Zvan

    Actually, looking further, this could be the missing mercy re: Paul Minor.http://www.jacksonfreepress.com/index.php/site/comments/paul_minors_wife_dies_without_him_041409/Not allowed to post bond on his appeal by a judge who once hired Rove and who later recused herself for conflict of interest–after the damage was done.

  10. 10
    Jason Thibeault

    !!!Outrage meter PEGGED.

Comments have been disabled.